Hi to all
When I run a backup of a Novell client I got this error message on dsmerror.log:
08/17/2004 09:33:15 (TSAFS.NLM 6.50 334) An internal TSA error has occurred. See error
log for details.
08/17/2004 09:33:15 (TSAFS.NLM 6.50 334) An internal TSA error has occurred. See error
log for
Hi,
I am currently in search for a new library for a small-medium sized
site. The new library should get FC-attached to a pSeries server,
runnning TSM 5.2.2
I've taken a closer look at an IBM 3583-18 with the following
features:
- 18 Slots
- Redundant Power Module
- 12 Cartridge I/O Station
- 4
Dear Guenther,
We have a similar configuration to the one you described, except we
are running TSM 5.1
3583 with 18 cartridge slots,
12 I/O slots
3 LTO drives
SAN Data Gateway.
fibre attached to a p630 server
running AIX 5.2
and TSM 5.1
We are very happy with our SAN and LTO. (The only
Hi Gyrgy!
I'm using a SAN Data Gateway, but I don't know what you mean by 'boot
parameters'. If you explain, I will let you know mine.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Gyrgy Hegeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004
Hello,
(Searched the list archives and mr. Sim's page, even read the manual)
We are seeing weird behaviour of the 5.2.3.1 client on
several Red Hat 7.3 systems.
(yes, we know 7.3 is very old but we can't upgrade for political reasons).
When we try to restore a file that resides on a tape
that
Hi Alexander,
I had a similar problem.
Could you please try on your AIX system where the ITSM sever is running the
command 'no -a | grep sack'?
What's the setting for sack?
regards, Rainer
Alexander
Verkooijen An: [EMAIL
Hello Rainer,
The value for sack is 0
Regards,
Alexander
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:32:30 +0200
Rainer Holzinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I had a similar problem.
Could you please try on your AIX system where the ITSM sever is running the
command 'no -a | grep sack'?
What's
Hi Alexander,
then your problem is a different one that I had.
Sorry,
Rainer
Alexander
Verkooijen An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopie:
NL Thema:
Aloha,
I want to delete old database backups.
I figured out for me self, that: del volh todate=today type=dbb should do the job.
I also made an new Full DB Backup today to fit the needs of that command, but i
always get the message :
It depends on DB backup you do. Do you do DB backup type DBB?
Fernando Figueiredo
-Original Message-
From: Mark Strasheim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: terça-feira, 17 de Agosto de 2004 11:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Deleting volhistory
Aloha,
I want to delete old database
Hello Gentelmen,
I have browsed through forums and newsgroups but failed to find an
answer. I have read that backupset generation can be a slow process,
however, I am experiencing a slow restore from backupset. The backupset
generation takes aproximately 8 (3 lto tapes) hours, however, now I see
Mark,
Maybe there are not any database backups to delete !
To check enter :-
query volh type=dbb
I think the cmd you have tried,
del volh todate=today type=dbb
if it had worked , would mean all your database backups would have been
wiped out !
Bill
Mark Strasheim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi TSMers,
I have a 77 GB database at present at 96% full, due to limited disk space
and no time available for a db unload / load process. I cannot extend or
reduce the db size with either of these methods.
I am unable to find any documentation on the clean backupgroups command. I
have the
Eric,
Thanks for your answer.
You can manage the SDG through the service port (serial port) by e.g. HyperTerminal.
While the SDG is starting you have a chance to stop the procedure by pressing a key.
Here, you get a prompt (after this point, the OS image should begin to boot), where
you can
...I am unable to find any documentation on the clean backupgroups command.
Dean - See my notes on it in http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
entry CLEANUP BACKUPGROUPs.
Richard Sims
Hi All,
Has anyone got any experience for connecting a Qualstar 8466 (with 2 x HP
LTO1 drive) to an IBM pSeries, so that I can use that library in
combination with TSM on that box.
Previously this Qualstar was connected to a W2K system with TSM, but that
system has become to small and we now
the last backup can't be deleted !
regards
joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von
Bill Dourado
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. August 2004 12:47
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Deleting volhistory
Mark,
Maybe there are not any
Joachim
That's good news !
Thanx
Bill
Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
17/08/2004 13:41
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:AW: Deleting
Hi Rainer,
Thanks for responding anyway.
Regards,
Alexander
- Original Message -
From: Rainer Holzinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:55 AM
Subject: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Linux restore hangs in IdleW
Hi Alexander,
then your problem is a
We've been running the 3583-18 for a year; this one is SCSI with LTO1
instead of LTO2.
18 slots
12 cart I/O station
2 LTO1 drives
Don't have the redundant power module.
Started at TSM 5.1, upgraded to TSM 5.2.2.
Have never had a failure of any kind on the library.
Attached to Windows.
Have
Hi Gyrgy!
Do you know the command to display these parameters? Or maybe, do you know
the file which contains these parameters? I can then look for you.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Gyrgy Hegeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
Robert,
I've seen problems with the tsafs nlm and TSM. Try running the old
tsa600 module instead.
Is this a new environment or has it been working?
Robert Ouzen wrote:
Hi to all
When I run a backup of a Novell client I got this error message on dsmerror.log:
08/17/2004 09:33:15 (TSAFS.NLM 6.50
Same as Wanda.
I work for an IBM business partner and we service
the 3583 and 3584 throughout the US. 85% of of customers are using
one of these two libraries. Most customers are transitioning to
LTO2.
The only problems we have had was one of
our customers tried to use a lower quality tape.
Hi!
I'm running TSM Server 5.1.8 in Solaris 8, and I detected some errors
related with simultaneous copy.
I'm using a 13Gb Diskpool for small files (this pool migrates to tape
pool at 80%) and tape pool to handle big files. To correct this problem
I need to add COPY_POOL to diskpool.
Is there a way to archive everything that has already been backed up to a new media
type, and how. We currently backup our Exchange servers to LTO tape and now for legal
purposes they need all of our Email data. They need it on 3590 tape, and we must keep
all of the data going back from today
I keep seeing this as the answer to Netware backup problems, yet it is
fast becoming a non-acceptible answer.
I was told that Novell has stated that TSA600 is being phased-out and
TSAFS will be the only module you need.
Who is the problem in these situation ? IBM or Novell ? Both ?
Jim
I am running: dsmserv auditdb diskstorage fix=yes (told to do so by the
support center). I keep getting the same message ANR4306I without
anything incrementing.
Has anyone seen this? Am I in for a long day?
Running TSM 5.1.9.0 on AIX 4.3.3.10 .
ANR4140I AUDITDB: Database audit process
Hi,
In a library sharing env. with the library manager [5.1.9.3] running
on Solaris8 and the library clients [5.1.9.3] running on various OS
(Solaris8 Linux) how do I have to define the PATH to the library
[IBM3584] ? only once ?
With n Solaris8 library clients the path to the library is only
Jason,
I don't know enough of your constraints or requirements to make a qualified
recommendation. However, faced with a similar situation my preference was
to create a second copy storage pool, backup the existing required data to
that new copypool, and save an extra bi-weekly (expiration
We've had some experience with this as of late and I have had good luck
with the latest TSAFS which is part of the TSA5UP15.exe patch on
Novell's download site.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/17/04 09:39AM
I keep seeing this as the answer to Netware backup problems, yet it is
fast becoming a
We just send the media to them, and I know it sounds strange, but it is there
responsibility to restore the data. I am assuming they use Tivoli. This is for legal
reasons...
The problem I am having is this.
The media goes to LTO tape with over 2.5 tb of data.
I need to stop backups for the
I am running: dsmserv auditdb diskstorage fix=yes (told to do so by
the support center). I keep getting the same message ANR4306I without
anything incrementing.
Has anyone seen this? Am I in for a long day?
Plural.
Search on that message number on the IBM site, where IC34159 may pertain.
The
Richard,
Thanks for the quick response. This sure sounds like my problem as I am
at the 5.1 level. I guess I have no choice but to kill (cntl-c) out of
the audit and make sure my system comes back up. Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Move to the TSAUP15.exe It is a vast improvement on the two previous
releases - much more reliable. The problem is probably Novell's on
this particular issue - but before you make assumptions, it isn't
always!
Tom
On 17 Aug 2004 at 9:52, DeLuisa Darren wrote:
We've had some experience with
Thanks to all for the issue on Novell
Regards
Robert Ouzen
--
FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM!
Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
http://mail.giantcompany.com
-Original Message-
Ah, I think I understand more about this, now.
If you put the old Exchange nodes in their own domain, you can set up the
copygroup to have nolimit versions and retainonly so that the old ones won't
expire.
It sounds as though you're going to continue to send the data to the outside
company, so
Perfect...Thanks.
The only bad thing is gonig to be copying the 2.5 tb of data from lto to 3590, WEW..
Thanks,
Jason
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Bill Smoldt
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
G.
Things I would look for.
Dont use 127.0.0.1/localhost for TCPserveraddress. This I have found to be
slower for TSM backup/restore on some OS's as it is just a test interface.
Make sure active virus scanning is turned off.
Software based raid will slow things down too.
You indicated that
Hi Matthew,
All the things you've mentioned are set correctly. The problem lies
within the server side, since it does send the data to the client very
slowly (and from the task manager I can see that the tsm server process
is reading data slowly as hell). There is probably no raid configuration
...I am experiencing a slow restore from backupset...
Please... When posting questions regarding restorals, please include
the command line(s) or GUI operation you are using, as the particulars
of the operation may make a huge difference, as IBM article swg21156683
illustrates in a Unix
Also don't forget the Basics
1) Turn Off Anti-Virus on incomming files to the backup client you are restoring.. we
ran in to this again Arggg
2) Check Backup CLient / Switch Connections and Backup server Network cards make sure
they are forced to Full Duplex... AutoNegotiate kills
The problem lies within the server side, since it does send the data to
the client very
slowly (and from the task manager I can see that the tsm server process
is reading data slowly as hell).
Wont that speed you see will just adjust itself to what the client can
write to the disk?
Most of the
One of the filesets on the AIX TSM 5.2 server CD is:
[MORE...12]
x
x tivoli.tsm.loc.server.ela
ALL x
x+ 5.2.0.0 IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Server E-Lic
Anyone know what this component is? A search on E-Lic on the IBM TSM
site did not find any matches.
Just a wild guess, but could it be in relation to an E series server license?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David E Ehresman
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: E-Lic ?
One of the filesets on the
Matthew,
Look into TSM release 4.2.2.13. One of the fixes in this release was for
this problem. We sat in on an IBM CritSit for this problem until this was
written.
Not sure if it will help but here is my experience from this issue. The
amount of files, size and directory structure play a huge
The command del volh todate=today type=dbb will delete up to the most
recent FULL db backup and all of the incrementals that go with it.
So if the db backup you did today was an incremental, you may not get have
any dbb volumes deleted. Run a full db backup, then try the del volh
command again.
We use an IBM 3582 (ULT3582-TL) tape library with the maximum of two LTO2/LTO1 drives
and fiber connected, has 23 slots. Been using it since November 2003 with a Linux
Redhat server and TSM 5.2.1 and now on 5.2.3 now. Works great... just update all
microcode and fiber code when you get it.
Se are getting the following error when trying to back up our DB2 database:
BACKUP DATABASE SWORDDB ONLINE USE TSM OPEN 1 SESSIONS WITH 4 BUFFERS BUFFER 1024
SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media /home/jail/sqllib/adsm/libtadsm.a.
Reason code: 406.
Things were working fine just a
Hi Everyone, thanks for sharing your thoughts !!!
Richard : you're right, I should have included the commands I used for
restore. But since I tried using them all it was only natural that I
forgot to mention that. I did try the GUI to restore all contents of the
backupset. Seeing that the speed
Anyone have anything on TSM and Windows DFS? We're trying to exclude the
DFS shares (for obvious reason) and not having any luck. Interestingly
enough, we get this when querying includes/excludes, but can find no
documentation that states how you would provide a DFS include/exclude:
Excl All
...
BACKUP DATABASE SWORDDB ONLINE USE TSM OPEN 1 SESSIONS WITH 4 BUFFERS BUFFER
1024 SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media
/home/jail/sqllib/adsm/libtadsm.a. Reason code: 406.
The Reason Code is the TSM API return code, which you can find in the API manual
or the TSM Messages
Are you talking about the server with the DFS Root and the DFS links? Or do you mean
the server that the shares are on? If the shares are being backed up via another
system then it might be that someone manaully backed it up while the links were mapped.
More clarification please?
Jon Adams
You can also try using FORCE=YES at the end of the command to force TSM to delete a
backup if you know they exist. This is undocument option in our version of TSM,
doesn't mention anything of it when doing a H DEL VOLH but it does work. Comes in
handy when trying to delete that solitary pesky
53 matches
Mail list logo
