Hi,
we are just testing the migration of a TSM 5.1.9.5 (AIX 4.3)
to a TSM 5.2.7.2 (AIX 5.2).
So far everything seems OK, policies and data were exported and
imported just fine, but I noticed a discrepancy in the file sizes
shown in a select from contents for ALL files (data are from a
Richard Hammersley schrieb:
The machine is a new dual processor P520 with 4 gig of memory attached
to an EMC cx300 san.
We also have a p520, but with 12 GB of memory. We're running TSM 5.3.3
on AIX 5.3.
Our inventory expiration runs once a week and takes more than 6 hours to
complete:
4CPU, Windows2003, 4GB Ram, CX700 Disks Raid5 (shared, 10k), TSM 5.3.2
During the same time there is expiration from an other smaller instance on the
same machine that lasts about an hour.
Regards Stefan Holzwarth
DB Speed Expiration
ACTIVITY Date Examined Objects Examined Up/Hr
EXPIRATION
Laura - Use the TSM Problem Determination Guide, which has been cited
in numerous postings.
Richard Sims
On Jul 27, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Laura Mastandrea wrote:
Running TSM 5.2.4 on AIX 5.3 and restoring a Windows 2000 Advanced
server
client. The filespace is on tape in a
On Jul 28, 2006, at 2:20 AM, Andreas Priebe wrote:
...
Note the difference in FILE_SIZE: 56210 vs. 11195180! This seems
strange!
And what does the difference in the field AGGREGATED mean (No vs.
124/256)?
...
Another thing is puzzeling me: the blank in the filename in the
select, which is
Production side:
TSM Server: 5.3.3 on AIX 5.3
Tape Library: 3584 with 8 LTO3 drives
DB2 database: 8.2, 1.2TB with 7 backup drives, backup time 1.2 hour
offisite copy, 2 processes, with 4 drives.
DR site:
TSM Server: 5.3.3 on AIX 5.3
Tape Library: 3584 with 4 LTO3 drives
My problem is, when I
Increase the number of processes used for the offsite copy. With only 2
processes, you have 2 target tapes, so the data may only be on 2 tapes in
the copypool. If you use more processes, you're more likely to have the
data spread across more tapes.
Nick Cassimatis
- Forwarded by Nicholas
I rec'd a failure last night for one of my backups.
Following is the pertinent section of the act log:
Date/TimeMessage
--
07/27/06 22:30:04 ANR2561I Schedule prompter contacting PROVTSM
(session
Look up the help information for message ANR2579E, that will give you
some direction. Also would be helpful to know the full server and client
versions you are using, output from Q EV F=D for this event and node name,
and Q SCHED F=D for this schedule.
Regarding the include/exclude question:
Have you received any replies ¿?
Could re-send it ¿?
Thanks,
Iban Bernaldo De Quiros Y Marquez
Technical Specialist
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Serrano Galvache, 56
Madrid 28033 ES
Phone +34 91 767 6233
Mobile + 34 659 01 91 12
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Mensaje
Hi Everybody,
We recently had a new rack addition installed in our 3494 library this Sunday.
Since that was done, we have been getting about 75 scratch tapes since Monday
being changed from scratch to a private state because of errors reading the
label. I've checked about 30 of these tapes and
300 gig fibre channel attached through a brocade switch. raid5 9 spindles.
topas shows between 94% and 100% busy for the hdiskpower0 device that
has the database and only the database on it. 1500 to 3000 tps, 5000 to 1
KB-read
Allen S. Rout wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:13:41 -0400,
On Jul 28, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Richard Mochnaczewski wrote:
Hi Everybody,
We recently had a new rack addition installed in our 3494 library
this Sunday. Since that was done, we have been getting about 75
scratch tapes since Monday being changed from scratch to a private
state because of errors
I just installed the Integrated Solutions Console for TSM and the Storage
Manager Administration Center
I entered a password during install for the icsadmin id and it won't accept
it when I login via the http interface
I made the password simple to start with and know that I am entering it
Hello,
We were receiving the message below on a tape volume file
in our primary storage pool during reclamation on 101645 processing
causing it to fail. I performed a Audit Volume 101645 fix=yes on the
volume in question.
ANR1330E The server has detected possible corruption in an
object being
Hi,
I have 2 servers connected to a DB2 server using a service IP (floating IP
/virtual IP) where only one server will actively connect to the DB at one
time.(When A down the Service IP will point to B, and B connect to DB.. Vice
versa).These servers have their own IP.
Currently I'm kind of
You can do a move volume and it should move all the good files. You may
have to do this a couple of times. This should get all the good files
off the tape. Now try the restore. If that wont work then the only
thing is delete the volume with discard=yes and you have lost data. If
it is current
One thing concerned me, you referred to having only one bad file, I think more
along the lines that I have a bad tape. I want to get the surviving data off
before more is killed by this failing tape.
The odds of data being lost in both the primary and copy pools is pretty low.
TSM, as you
do a move data to copy the good files from that tape to another, then a
upd vol to destroy the defective tape, then a restore stgpool which
should then only have to restore the missing file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/28/06 11:57 AM
One thing concerned me, you referred to having only one bad file, I
Thanks everyone for you help!
regards
Lawrence Clark wrote:
do a move data to copy the good files from that tape to another, then a
upd vol to destroy the defective tape, then a restore stgpool which
should then only have to restore the missing file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/28/06 11:57 AM
Thanks for your reply Nick. That's the good point. I am wondering, I did not
change anything, why the first time, it used 4 drives but the second time
only used 2 drives.
On 7/28/06, Nicholas Cassimatis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Increase the number of processes used for the offsite copy. With
No replies.
At 08:42 AM 7/28/2006, Bernaldo de Quiros, Iban 1 wrote:
Have you received any replies ¿?
-Mensaje original-
De: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Paul Zarnowski
Enviado el: martes, 18 de julio de 2006 21:09
Para: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Good evening,
I've got the following setup:
TSM 5.3.2 server on AIX 5.3
TSM 5.3.2 clients on SLES 9 (SP2) on x86_64 HW
Adic library with IBM LTO3 FC drives
The linux clients can access the library through the SAN and have the IBMtape
drivers installed.
But if a modification to the
Thanks to Andrew for his invaluable help!
I am running an older Client version that has been shown to
display this bug from time to time.
I will need to update the client shortly.
About the incremental backup problem.
Unfortunately, I have never watched as an incremental was
The facts...
TSM server v5.3.1.2
TDP for Exchange 5.2.1.0
Exchange data resides on VTL emulating 3584
The exchange box runs 1 Gbps, but we're only receiving data at 5 to 7 MB/Sec
What all tuning can I do on the client machine, in dsm.opt, on server,
anything? Thanks!
God bless you!!!
We are seeing increasingly frequent problems reading data from 3592
tapes. TSM sometimes spends as much as a couple of hours reading a
single file with a size of a few hundred megabyes. In some cases,
TSM reports a hardware or media error at the end of that time. In
other cases TSM eventually
Richard Hammersley a écrit :
300 gig fibre channel attached through a brocade switch. raid5 9
spindles.
topas shows between 94% and 100% busy for the hdiskpower0 device that
has the database and only the database on it. 1500 to 3000 tps, 5000
to 1 KB-read
Allen S. Rout wrote:
On
Hi,
Are these scratch tapes new tapes? Did you used the label libv command
on the checkin?
TSM puts unlabeled tapes on the private list unless you configure your
library to autolabel new tapes.
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
28 matches
Mail list logo
