Hello,
Thank you for your answers. We do not use compression or encryption (except on
2 servers) and our video files will not be in the copy pool. So we will go with
the VTL then.
Best Regards,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
copy pool (with more nodes
in tsm, but they are not that important). Of that 16TB, 3-4 TB are MSSQL and
Oracle Databases, the rest is Windows and Linux Operating Systems.
The way I see it, there are two options.
1: We get another TS3310 base model with LTO-5 drives (or any other Tape
Library
Daniel,
Be sure to take into account the amount of data that is encrypted and/or
compressed before it is written to the VTL. Same for servers with large numbers
of files that don't dedup well, as has already been mentioned. Since the VTL
won't be able to dedup or compress it, your dedup ratio on
needed.
Hope this helps.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Weidacher, Daniel
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 2:01 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Copy Pool - Tape Library or VTL?
Hello,
In our company
Hello,
In our company we have a TSM 6.2 Server with a TS3310+Extension (LTO-4) Library
for primary pools and an Overland Library for copy pools (LTO-2). Now the
Overland is nearing retirement and we need a replacement.
We have 46 Nodes with a total of ~16TB in need of a copy pool (with more
Re: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] tsm reclaim of copy pool
It's also possible that a necessary volume was in use by another process or
restore.
As Ullrich said, run the reclaim again. Or you can use "Move data" for the
volume.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manag
@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Ullrich Mänz
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:07 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Antwort: [ADSM-L] tsm reclaim of copy pool
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> message ANR1163W is issued at the end of an offline reclamation process
> that ended bef
lrich Mänz
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:07 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Antwort: [ADSM-L] tsm reclaim of copy pool
Hi Tim,
message ANR1163W is issued at the end of an offline reclamation process that
ended before all data could be "moved" to a new copypool tape.
Mostly, you&#
Reclaim of a copy pool will read the data from any available primary pool if
the copy tape is not available.
When I have seen that problem I have found a bad primary volume and usually end
up restoring from the copy.
I suspect if you check the log from the previous few minutes you will find a
3500 10
Web: http://www.fum.de
Amtsgericht Ulm, Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 1936
Geschäftsführer: Heribert Fritz
Inhaber: Imtech N.V., Gouda, Niederlande
Von:Tim Brown
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU,
Datum: 07.02.2013 19:54
Betreff:[ADSM-L] tsm reclaim of copy pool
Gesendet von:
Shouldn't a reclaim of a copy pool get the data from the corresponding primary
pool if all the tapes
besides the current one is marked as offsite.
Error message during reclaim:
ANR1163W Offsite volume A00018L5 still contains files
which could not be moved. (SESSION: 3848, PROCESS: 41)
A00
I saw this in multiple environments and as long it's not that copy has less
objects than primary, I actually don't care ;-)
Is it possible that if a file exists in multiple aggregates (i.e. big
files), the file is counted multiple times in the copy?
Regards,
Maurice
2012/12/5 Ehresman,David E.
What is retention set on copy pools versus primary pools ?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Allen
S. Rout
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 8:42 AM
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than
On 12/06/2012 11:19 AM, Ehresman,David E. wrote:
> No move data involved.
>
> In fact, the problem persists after deleting all the copy pool volumes for
> this node and doing a fresh backup stg.
>
If you're doing that level of evaluation, then I suggest you q contents
for the
No move data involved.
In fact, the problem persists after deleting all the copy pool volumes for this
node and doing a fresh backup stg.
David
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Skylar
Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, December 05
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] More files in copy pool than primary pool?
how many pri stg pools do you have and what is hierarchy (next stg)
the other thing is check expire inventory process for errors
Chavdar
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Ehresman,David E.
wrote:
> I'm running TSM 6.2.4.0 on AIX.
I think if you do a MOVE NODEDATA to migrate data from one primary pool
to another, the data in the copy pool stays intact. I don't think there
is a way to expire it other than through the normal node-prompted
expiration.
On 12/05/2012 11:20 AM, Ehresman,David E. wrote:
> I'm runnin
how many pri stg pools do you have and what is hierarchy (next stg)
the other thing is check expire inventory process for errors
Chavdar
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Ehresman,David E.
wrote:
> I'm running TSM 6.2.4.0 on AIX.
>
> How can a node have more files in the copy storagepool (nr-ofl) t
I'm running TSM 6.2.4.0 on AIX.
How can a node have more files in the copy storagepool (nr-ofl) then in the
primary storagepool (nr-pvl)?
tsm: ULTSM>q occ idmtest5
Node Name Type Filespace FSID StorageNumber of Physical Logical
Name Pool Name Files
TSM Server under AIX.
I am interesting in any information for using remote copy pools base on iSCSI
disks (long instance via Internet VPN or leased lines).
Possibility? Support by TSM? Risks? Performance?
I will deeply appreciate any shared experience or links to docs.
Grigori G. Solonovitch
Sen
m on TSM Server at Head Office (we have 1Gb
> Ethernet connection between HO and DRS);
>3) create FILE device class for NFS file system at HO;
>4) create copy pool in NFS file system at HO;
>5) backup primary pools to remote copy pool daily at HO.
>After Disaster Site
system on AIX server at Disaster Site, where disaster TSM
Server is activated in case of disaster;
2) create NFS file system on TSM Server at Head Office (we have 1Gb
Ethernet connection between HO and DRS);
3) create FILE device class for NFS file system at HO;
4) create copy pool in
e and Disaster Site at all by direct
copy to DR site;
- to speed up recovery process using parallel recovery from FILE copy pool
(better performance and no mount limit).
Grigori G. Solonovitch
Senior Technical Architect
Information Technology Ahli United Bank Kuwait
o:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 7:58 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Using copy pool (device class FILE)
I have:
1) defined target server AUBKDR on source server BKME by "def ser AUBKDR
password=xxx hla=yyy lla=
rver BKME to target server AUBDR by
"exp node XXX filedata=none tos=AUBKDR";
7) create FILE device class on server AUBKDR by "define devclass DCP3_DR
devtype=FILE mountlimit=32 maxcapacity=64G directory=/DCP3_DR shared=yes" -
shared=y is OK or not?
8) created FILE copy p
.@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:02 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Using copy pool (device class FILE)
Hello Everybody,
I am trying to avoid tape movement between Head Office and Disaster Site by
using additional copy pool (devi
I may be oversimplifying, but all you need to do is create a Copy pool
using the Devclass file... Of course you have to have a FCIP connection
or configure TSM to TSM server to server with virtual volumes.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On
Hello Everybody,
I am trying to avoid tape movement between Head Office and Disaster Site by
using additional copy pool (device class FILE) at Disaster Site:
1) main instance of TSM Server 5.5.4.1 is running at Head Office;
2) additional instance of TSM Server 5.5.4.1 is running at Disaster Site
torage Planning and Implementation
Enterprise Architecture - Backup & Recovery Architect
Adrian Compton
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
19/07/2010 08:56
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
[ADSM-L] Copy Pool Quest
Hi All
I have 3 copy pools on my TSM server.
One for normal type retention, one for monthly, and one for yearly.
The though process behind it was that similar type retention data i.e
monthly schedules are moved to monthly copy pools etc.
Am iwrong in doing this.
If I keep them all
Dist Stor cc
Manager"
Re: [AD
Why not just configure your old primary pool to use the new primary pool as its
"next stg pool" and migrate. Then perform a backup stg pool from the new
primary to your new copy pool? Once all data has been migrated and backed up,
delete the old pools
Thank you,
~Rick Adams
Karel,
I think you are right.
I should copy the old primary pool firstly to the new copy pool (and
accept the high number of scratch used) BEFORE I migrate the data from old
primary stg to new primary stg.
It seems that there is no other solution.
Thanks for the feedback.
Best regards
ailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Grigori Solonovitch
Sent: woensdag 14 juli 2010 16:16
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Copy Pool question
Ther is no other solution. You can only speed up process:
1) expiry will remove the oldest data from old primary and copy pools;
2) you can migrate the ne
remaing volume in old copy pool (copy will be in the new copy pols as well)m
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Ronald Le
Large [rlela...@epo.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 4:26 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L
I have a related issue...
I have a new primary stg pool and a new copy pool.
I have also an 'old' primary pool and an 'old' copy pool.
There is no new data arriving in the 'old' primary pool because backup data
is send to the 'new' primary pool. This data
.
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mehdi Salehi
[ezzo...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 2:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] copy pool for restore load balancing
Hi,
A primary tape pool has 8 drives and they are busy
The copy pool is used for restoration only if the volumes in the
primary pool are unavailable, or the primary pool itself is
unavailable, which you would tend to find only in a DR situation.
Pre-emption applies to your situation, based upon the priority of a
restore versus backup. See the
Hi,
A primary tape pool has 8 drives and they are busy right now. Will the copy
pool (which is an on-site tape pool defined on another tape library) help if
clients need to restore something? Copy pool helps if something is wrong
with the primary pool, how about contribution to restore if primary
__
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT [andy.hueb...@alconlabs.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 7:16 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Copy Pool question
We will be swapping out our old VTLs for new VTLs. Our copy po
split.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:34 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Copy Pool question
Andy -
Your scenario is vague as to exactly what you are
Andy -
Your scenario is vague as to exactly what you are doing, so difficult to
answer. Obviously, you don't do Backup Stgpool against a VTL: you do it with a
primary storage pool. We don't know whether the primary or copy is being
migrated, or how, or if another incarnation is being created.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
wrote:
> We will be swapping out our old VTLs for new VTLs. Our copy pools will
> remain unchanged.
>
> Are these statements accurate?
That's correct.
--
Warm regards,
Michael Green
the copy pools, the existing data will remain.
As we migrate the data from old to new, the BackupSTG process will not
duplicate the data. Meaning I will not have 2 copies of the same object in the
copy pool.
As we migrate the date from old to new, the BackupSTG process will not recopy
the data to
Thanks so much
CPU2TSM::
http://www.cristie.se/cpu2tsm-supported-platforms
Från: Mehdi Salehi [ezzo...@googlemail.com]
Skickat: den 14 april 2010 09:00
Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Ämne: LTO4 copy pool with TS3500 and LTO5 drives
Hi all,
Can I define a primary and a copy pool
Haven't you encountered difficulties in check-in /check-out process? Any
confusion for operators?
Hello,
Yes you can. I do it with LTO3 i500 library as a copy pool and ts3500 with lto4
as primary pool.
Hana
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mehdi
Salehi
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:01 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Hi all,
Can I define a primary and a copy pool on a TS3500 with LTO5 drives with the
following conditions:
- primary pool uses LTO5 cartridges
- copy pool uses LTO4 cartridges (because the library in D/R site has LTO4
drives)
Thanks
Either works, it all depends on what you are trying to achieve.
A Copy pool will help in 2 ways:
1. You have another copy of the data incase of media failure
2. You have a copy of the data incase of Library/DC/Site failure
So if you have you copy pool in the same library as your primary and
PM
Subject: [ADSM-L] storage pool and its copy pool on a tape library
Hi,
What is the best practice to backup a tape storage pool? Is is
possible/recommended to use one tape library (with enough drives) for a
storage pool and its copy pool? How about dedicating a tape library to
copy
storage pool?
Hi,
What is the best practice to backup a tape storage pool? Is is
possible/recommended to use one tape library (with enough drives) for a
storage pool and its copy pool? How about dedicating a tape library to copy
storage pool?
thanks so much
l at once like a script? or one at a time? Thanks for
your response!
Brett
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of David
E Ehresman
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 2:27 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] discrepanc
: Thursday, September 24, 2009 2:27 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] discrepancy between primary pool and copy pool
Back when I was running a version of TSM with that bug, I did a reset on all
storage pool volumes each day. Fortunately, its been long fixed on supported
versions
Back when I was running a version of TSM with that bug, I did a reset on all
storage pool volumes each day. Fortunately, its been long fixed on supported
versions of the server. Upgrade!
David
>>> "Whitlock, Brett" 9/24/2009 1:26 PM
>>> >>>
Friends of TSM,
I run scripts to compare the numb
Friends of TSM,
I run scripts to compare the number of files and G in my primary pools and copy
pools. Sometimes they don't match up. I run an extra backup stg and it says
'no data to copy'. The work around on this is to go through the primary pool
volumes and do a Q CON volume COPIED=NO. O
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joni Moyer
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 8:51 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: NAS NDMP backups using a copy pool
Hello everyone,
I recently upgraded a TSM AIX 5.3 server to 5.5.1.1 and would like to
begin
On Dec 4, 2008, at 17:51 , Joni Moyer wrote:
Hello everyone,
I recently upgraded a TSM AIX 5.3 server to 5.5.1.1 and would like to
begin utilizing the copy pools for our offsite backups. I've been
searching in the 5.5 manuals for good documentation on how to set
this up
and then fold it into o
Hello everyone,
I recently upgraded a TSM AIX 5.3 server to 5.5.1.1 and would like to
begin utilizing the copy pools for our offsite backups. I've been
searching in the 5.5 manuals for good documentation on how to set this up
and then fold it into our DRM plan, but I'm not finding much. Does any
You can create another copy pool for offsite that is LTO4, and then backup your
primary pools to the LTO4 offsite copy pool.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dollens,
Bruce
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:15 AM
To: ADSM-L
This can be accomplished same way how we make copy from primary pool.
Start backing to LTO4 pool , when you done complete backup to LTO4 ,
DELETE LTO2 copy pool.
Good luck
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dollens, Bruce
Sent
remember correctly you cannot do that on a copy
pool.
13264743.75
PRIMARY 18109346 13511321.49
HTH
Thomas Rupp
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Adrian
Compton
Gesendet: Montag, 21. April 2008 12:07
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: [ADSM-L] Copy Pool Status
Hi fellow TSM'ers
I have a question around the Backup of Storage pools to copy pools, done
daily.
Is there a script/mechanism to see how far the process is while it is
running.
thanks
Adrian Compton
IT Baan Operation/ Group IBM Tivoli Admin
Pharmacare Limited trading as Aspe
hmm I have not explored this area of server to server copypools.. Hope that
someone else would be in better position.. ! I guess Michael.
Sadat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ok. I should have said that the copy pool is defined on a server to server
> connection. So the
Hi,
ok. I should have said that the copy pool is defined on a server to server
connection. So the server that creates the copy pool has volumes named
.BFS.xxx and the destination server has 3590 volumes.
So far I have deleted the 3590 volume no. 1234567 from the "destination&qu
he archives but no success yet.
> > Today one of our tape was torn off and is still stuck within the drive.
> > Tomorrow an IBM technician will repair the drive (state: unavailable).
> > The tape volume is used as copy pool volume. What do I have to do to
> > checkout
w an IBM technician will repair the drive (state: unavailable).
> The tape volume is used as copy pool volume. What do I have to do to checkout
> the tape off the library and resync the copy pool for the data of that tape ?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Egonls
>
> _
Hi,
I tried finding a solution in the archives but no success yet.
Today one of our tape was torn off and is still stuck within the drive.
Tomorrow an IBM technician will repair the drive (state: unavailable).
The tape volume is used as copy pool volume. What do I have to do to checkout
the
On Feb 27, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Carpenter, Curtis wrote:
Ok. But should I have expected the tapes in the old pool to expire?
No. A copy storage pool is a "commitment": its contents persist as
long as the primary pool files exist. To get rid of an old copy
storage pool, perform DELete Volume on
Ok. But should I have expected the tapes in the old pool to expire?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: February 27, 2007 7:49 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Verifying data exists in new Copy Pool
Curtis -
The simple answer is that if you perform a Backup Stgpool to your new
copy storage pool, and it runs to completion without errors, then all
desired data is there - no issues.
You can use the COPied=Yes specification of Query CONtent to verify
that a given primary tape is "mirrored".
Hello All. Need some help here. Our Gen_Tape pool currently uses
Jaguar tapes and Gen_Tape would normally backup to Gen_Offsite which
used 3590 tapes. I recently created a new Gen_Offsite copy pool that
uses Jaguar tapes and renamed the old Gen_Offsite copy pool that used
the 3590 tapes to
Thank you Richard, using the command line worked...silly GUI...
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: February 22, 2007 8:07 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM problem with Removing Copy Pool from
ove GEN_OFFSITE as our current copy pool for GEN_TAPE?
You would code a null string (""), as shows in the Admin Ref manual,
to nullify the copy storage pool assignment. But I should think that
you'd want to use the function, as long as the simultaneous resources
required area realisti
o 2. Does it need to be higher than that?
so if I were to run a upd stgpool GEN_TAPE copystg=nothing, would that
remove GEN_OFFSITE as our current copy pool for GEN_TAPE?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: February 22,
On Feb 22, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Carpenter, Curtis wrote:
We are running TSM Server 5.2.7 on AIX 5.3.03. We assigned a copy
pool
to our GEN_TAPE sequential access pool. We are trying to remove this
copy pool because it is causing us to receive the following messages:
ANR4734W Copy storage pool
Hello All
We are running TSM Server 5.2.7 on AIX 5.3.03. We assigned a copy pool
to our GEN_TAPE sequential access pool. We are trying to remove this
copy pool because it is causing us to receive the following messages:
ANR4734W Copy storage pool COPYPOOL was removed from the copy storage
We are running TSM Server 5.2.7 on AIX 5.3.03. We assigned a copy pool
to our GEN_TAPE sequential access pool. We are trying to remove this
copy pool because it is causing us to receive the following messages:
ANR4734W Copy storage pool COPYPOOL was removed from the copy storage
pool list
On Jan 10, 2007, at 4:38 PM, RODOLFICH, NICHOLAS wrote:
Hello all,
Thanks for your help!!
We had 3 volumes that were shipped offsite get destroyed. I am
thinking
that these volumes will be recreated the next time the primary storage
pool gets backed up? Is this correct or is there something el
Hello all,
Thanks for your help!!
We had 3 volumes that were shipped offsite get destroyed. I am thinking
that these volumes will be recreated the next time the primary storage
pool gets backed up? Is this correct or is there something else that
needs to be done?
Also how do I disposition the vol
The scenario is I have a copy pool tape that was accidently damaged. I
would like to know which primary pool tapes I would need to recreate
this copypool tape. The first obvious way is to run a backup stgpool
preview=yes command however that will ALSO show other volumes out of
sync and doesn&#
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Boyer
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:05 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: restore directly from copy pool tapes
Only thing I would disagree with is the order of your checkins. Maybe
for an actual disaster, but for a D/R test where you have your
copy
"Law of Cybernetic Entomology - There is always another bug." - ??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kauffman,
Tom
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 11:31 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: restore directly from copy pool
hard Hammersley
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:40 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: restore directly from copy pool tapes
I'm working on a disaster recovery scenario where our TSM server (AIX)
and tape
library (3584)that has 90 LTO tapes in tape pools is destroyed and
several other
serve
nor server** processes can
access files stored on the volume.
Leigh
"-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Large, M (Matthew)
Sent: 09 August 2006 16:01
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] restore directly from copy
On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Large, M (Matthew) wrote:
I find it much easier to just update the storage pool
Tsm:> upd stgpool acc=reado
You mean: ACCess=UNAVailable.
t update the storage pool
Tsm:> upd stgpool acc=reado
Just a thought..
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: 09 August 2006 15:55
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] restore directly from copy pool tapes
E
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Hammersley
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:40 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: restore directly from copy pool tapes
I'm working on a disaster recovery scenario where our TSM server
start your
restores.
Wanda Prather
"I/O, I/O, It's all about I/O" -(me)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Hammersley
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:40 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: rest
You can update all the primary tapes to unavailable
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Richard Hammersley
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:40 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: restore directly from copy pool tapes
I'm working
I'm working on a disaster recovery scenario where our TSM server (AIX) and tape
library (3584)that has 90 LTO tapes in tape pools is destroyed and several other
servers are destroyed. We have approx. 85 copy pool tapes off site.
Our thought is to recreate the TSM server via mksysb, restor
>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:59:27 -0500, "Allen S. Rout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm trying to work out exactly how IBM thinks virtual volume
> reclamation is supposed to proceed, and also how we think it does in
> fact proceed. ;)
So, I'm back to make recitation of my errors and oversights in
t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 March 2006 15:59
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Virtual Volume Copy Pool Reclamation
_
Greetings, all.
I'm trying to work out exactly how IBM thinks virtual volume reclamation is
sup
Greetings, all.
I'm trying to work out exactly how IBM thinks virtual volume
reclamation is supposed to proceed, and also how we think it does in
fact proceed. ;)
Noodling around in the docs and QuickFacts, I find that volumes of a
devclass of type SERVER "may not be set to access=offsite", and
When you define or update your stgpool use the
COPYSTGpools--=copypoolname option. For the syntax just type help
update stgpool at the command line.
The documentation says it works with both random and sequential access
methods, but i have never been able to get it to work on random.
cory
] Concurrent primary and copy pool backup
I remember reading about being able to do backups to a primary and copy
storage pool concurrently but I can't find this info anymore. Is anyone
doing this ? Can you please point me to the manual / command to set
this up. I am running TSM 5.2.6 (AIX) with 5.
I remember reading about being able to do backups to a primary and copy
storage pool concurrently but I can't find this info anymore. Is anyone
doing this ? Can you please point me to the manual / command to set
this up. I am running TSM 5.2.6 (AIX) with 5.2 and 5.3 clients (AIX,
Windows and HP-
> The initial hardware was a Cisco 5428-2(iscsi)/2109-F16(fc)/3592 tape
> combo over a 1Gb connection. We have a Cisco 9216i to replace the
> 5428/2109-F16 combo and are looking at etherchannel or maybe even a 10
> Gb link in the next few months.
>
I also agree with Wanda that having a directly ac
Paul Zarnowski said the following on 12/21/05 12:00 PM:
We are looking to implement a copy storage pool in a distant location
(200 miles away). Network connectivity is good - 1Gb e/n to start
with. DR site is not necessarily the same location as the copy storage
site.
We are considering the fo
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
