Re: Changing DRM tape status from "Vault"

2012-11-12 Thread Alexander Oltu
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:25:12 + James Thorne wrote: > I had this problem recently and doing an "update vol > acc=reado" worked for me. The volume disappeared from DRM and was > deleted. James, thank you! That worked for me. Alex.

Re: Changing DRM tape status from "Vault"

2012-11-12 Thread Alexander Oltu
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:54:54 -0800 Cargill, Bill wrote: > Did you have the discarddata=yes option on the delete command? > > Thanks, > Hi Bill, yes, I did otherwise it won't delete. Thanks, Alex.

Re: Changing DRM tape status from "Vault"

2012-11-09 Thread Cargill, Bill
Alexander Oltu Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 12:39 AM To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Subject: Changing DRM tape status from "Vault" Hello, I have few tapes in 'q drmedia' in the "vault" state which I would like to delete. I know that the tapes have no any content because they w

Changing DRM tape status from "Vault"

2012-11-09 Thread Alexander Oltu
Hello, I have few tapes in 'q drmedia' in the "vault" state which I would like to delete. I know that the tapes have no any content because they were deleted with the 'del vol' command. I tried 'move drmedia tostate', but, sure, it is not working, as this is not supported. I guess I need to expir

Re: SV: Tape Status in ISC?

2009-10-26 Thread Carol Trible
ST.EDU Ämne: Re: Tape Status in ISC? Hi Christian, I"m not sure what you mean by "Access status" - if you mean q status, some of the information is in the server properties notebook. From any panel with a list of servers, select y our server and the action Server Properties. The

SV: Tape Status in ISC?

2009-10-25 Thread Christian Svensson
Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] för Carol Trible [tri...@us.ibm.com] Skickat: den 23 oktober 2009 19:20 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Re: Tape Status in ISC? Hi Christian, I"m not sure what you mean by &quo

Re: Tape Status in ISC?

2009-10-23 Thread Carol Trible
Hi Christian, I"m not sure what you mean by "Access status" - if you mean q status, some of the information is in the server properties notebook. From any panel with a list of servers, select y our server and the action Server Properties. The information on whether or not is is managed or is a

Tape Status in ISC?

2009-10-23 Thread Christian Svensson
Hi *SMers, Try to learn the ISC on request from a customer. (Don't know why). But I want to get "Access status" or "q vol f=d" from a tape volume in ISC. Does anyone know where to go to find that?. ISC version 6.1.0.0 Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.sve

Library server getting confused about tape status?

2007-07-12 Thread Allen S. Rout
I've been seeing series of messages like these in my library manager log. 07/11/07 06:59:40 ANR8945W Scratch volume mount failed T00142. (SESSION: 125022) 07/11/07 06:59:40 ANR8381E 3592 volume T00142 could not be mounted in drive DRIVE2 (/dev/rmt6). (SESSION: 125022) 07/11/07 06:5

Re: NDMP tape status

2005-03-04 Thread Iain Barnetson
anyway. Sorry I can't be of more help, hopefully someone else can be more helpful. Iain -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: 04 March 2005 20:21 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] NDMP tape status Hi Iai

Re: NDMP tape status

2005-03-04 Thread Joni Moyer
VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU> Re: NDMP tape status 03/04/2005 02:52 PM

Re: NDMP tape status

2005-03-04 Thread Iain Barnetson
hange the "rem" parameter. If you do a "help move media" at the cmd you'll get the complete details. Hope this helps, it certainly did me :) Iain -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joni Moyer Sent: 04 March 2005

Re: NDMP tape status

2005-03-04 Thread Curtis Stewart
" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject NDMP tape status Hi Everyone! I am trying to eject the NDMP backup tapes from our library and send them offsite. I tried to update the access of the tapes to offsite, but it won't let me stating that it has to be a copy storage pool volume or a

NDMP tape status

2005-03-04 Thread Joni Moyer
Hi Everyone! I am trying to eject the NDMP backup tapes from our library and send them offsite. I tried to update the access of the tapes to offsite, but it won't let me stating that it has to be a copy storage pool volume or a volume with devclass of server. Since I can't do either of these, wh

Re: tape status is pending (?)

2004-10-20 Thread Warren, Matthew (Retail)
harlau Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: tape status is pending (?) Hi Matt, we make every day a Backup from our TSM DB on disk and once in a week on tape. Is this o.k.? Roland . -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:

AW: tape status is pending (?)

2004-10-19 Thread Roland Scharlau
PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: tape status is pending (?) Roland, Be aware that your reusedelay parameter should be the same as the number of days back that you keep TSM DB Backups for. This ensures that should you need to restore to a database backup other than the most recent, data will still be

Re: tape status is pending (?)

2004-10-19 Thread Warren, Matthew (Retail)
. _-'-_ -|- -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland Scharlau Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: tape status is pending (?) Hi Michael, i changed the parameter to 3 days and deleted the volume.

AW: tape status is pending (?)

2004-10-19 Thread Roland Scharlau
2004 12:38 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: AW: tape status is pending (?) Hi, look at storgepool definition "reusedelay" parameter "q stg COPYPOOL f=d" After a volumes comes empty the volume change his status to pending if reuse delay is defined on storagepool. You can delete

AW: tape status is pending (?)

2004-10-19 Thread Michael Garnebode
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Roland Scharlau Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Oktober 2004 12:18 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: tape status is pending (?) Hello, has anybody an idea when a tape get this status: Volume Name 86L1 Storage Pool Name COPYPOO

tape status is pending (?)

2004-10-19 Thread Roland Scharlau
Hello, has anybody an idea when a tape get this status: Volume Name 86L1 Storage Pool Name COPYPOOL Device Class Name LTOCLASS1 Estimated Capacity (MB) 0.0 Scaled Capacity Applied - Pct Util 0.0 Volume Status PENDING Access READWRITE Pct. Reclaimable Space 0.0 Scratch Volume? NO In

Re: Strange tape status

2003-12-17 Thread Ted Byrne
I moved the tape with tapeutil to an I/O-slot and then tried a Label Libvolume on it, but all TSM gave me was: 17-12-2003 14:55:20 ANR8841I Remove volume from slot 30 of library 3575LIB at your convenience. Richard, Is the tape write-protected? I've seen the same log msg when (inadvertently) att

Strange tape status

2003-12-17 Thread Richard van Denzel
Hi All, When I do a show slots 3575lib I see the following: Slot 88, status Full, element number 134, barcode present, barcode value <07527C> The tape doesn't belong to TSM anymore (not with q v, q libv, q volh). It is not a DB backup tape either. I moved the tape with tapeutil to an I/O-slot a

Re: odd tape status

2003-11-19 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: odd tape status Hi all, yesterday I tried to label a 9940 tape, this failed for some reason. Now the odd thing is that: 1- acsls has no lock on the volume 2- the volume is not in the libvols: tsm: BASKET>q libvol * 200825 ANR2034E QUERY LIBVOLUME: No ma

odd tape status

2003-11-19 Thread Remco Post
Hi all, yesterday I tried to label a 9940 tape, this failed for some reason. Now the odd thing is that: 1- acsls has no lock on the volume 2- the volume is not in the libvols: tsm: BASKET>q libvol * 200825 ANR2034E QUERY LIBVOLUME: No match found using this criteria. ANS8001I Return code 11. 3-

Re: tape status

2003-10-26 Thread Deon George
gt; > > -Original Message- > From: Deon George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 24 October 2003 3:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: tape status > > > Dat, > > No, TSM will NEVER let you (re)label a tape, if the tape is already known > t

Re: tape status

2003-10-24 Thread David E Ehresman
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tape status Dat, No, TSM will NEVER let you (re)label a tape, if the tape is already known to the current TSM server (ie: it is defined in Q VOLHIST or Q VOL). If you try, in your activity log you'll see a label libv failure and the reason why (and the existing lab

Re: tape status

2003-10-24 Thread Richard Sims
>I got LTO tapes that that was labelled into a 3583 library some months back, >now when i do a query volume, ie > >q vol gpc027 f=d > >I get a message: > >ANR2034E QUERY VOLUME: No match found using this criteria. >ANS8001I Return code 11. Refer to the Admin Ref description of the Query Volume com

Re: tape status

2003-10-24 Thread Dat Vo
: Command: Regards Dat -Original Message- From: Deon George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 24 October 2003 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tape status Dat, No, TSM will NEVER let you (re)label a tape, if the tape is already known to the current TSM server (ie

Re: tape status

2003-10-23 Thread Deon George
27;ve also tried q libvol , but the tape isnt there either. > > > Regards > > Dat > > > -Original Message- > From: Deon George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 24 October 2003 1:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: tape status > > > Da

Re: tape status

2003-10-23 Thread Dat Vo
ED] Subject: Re: tape status Dat, Q VOL will only show SCRATCH tapes that have data on them, or DEFINED tapes (when you use the define vol command), or sometimes (as you've captured below), you will also see SCRATCH tapes that are EMPTY - this will be because: * They recently became empty a

Re: tape status

2003-10-23 Thread Deon George
Dat, Q VOL will only show SCRATCH tapes that have data on them, or DEFINED tapes (when you use the define vol command), or sometimes (as you've captured below), you will also see SCRATCH tapes that are EMPTY - this will be because: * They recently became empty and TSM hasnt yet deleted them (retu

tape status

2003-10-23 Thread Dat Vo
Hi, I got LTO tapes that that was labelled into a 3583 library some months back, now when i do a query volume, ie q vol gpc027 f=d I get a message: ANR2034E QUERY VOLUME: No match found using this criteria. ANS8001I Return code 11. If the tape has expired as tape as part of the system policy,

Re: Tape status

2003-02-03 Thread Seay, Paul
. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Northrop Grumman Information Technology 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Bengani, Thabani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape status Hi Tsmers, I have a problem with my tapes in the

Re: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Rainer Wolf
s Analyst II > Memorial Healthcare System > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > P: (954) 987-2020 x4597 > F: (954) 985-1404 > --- > > -Original Message- > From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:43 AM

Re: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Bruce Kamp
TECTED] Subject: Re: Tape status Re: Your mystery Private status on volumes... Show us the output of a 'Query Volume __ F=D' on one of them. Of particular interest is "Scratch Volume?" (to reveal whether the tape is from a scratch pool or was Defined to the storage pool, in wh

Re: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Richard Sims
Re: Your mystery Private status on volumes... Show us the output of a 'Query Volume __ F=D' on one of them. Of particular interest is "Scratch Volume?" (to reveal whether the tape is from a scratch pool or was Defined to the storage pool, in which case empty and Private makes sense); and Date

Re: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Bengani, Thabani
status Hi Thabs, Even although it is marked private, the fact that is emptyit should still backup to the tapes. What actually happened ? Linds -Original Message- From: Bengani, Thabani Sent: 29 January 2003 12:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape status Hi Tsmers, I have a

Re: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Crawford, Lindy
Hi Thabs, Even although it is marked private, the fact that is emptyit should still backup to the tapes. What actually happened ? Linds -Original Message- From: Bengani, Thabani Sent: 29 January 2003 12:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tape status Hi Tsmers, I have a problem

Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Bengani, Thabani
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Tape status Does the actlog say somthing like" unable to read label of volume status is now changed to private to prevent reaccess" I also have to agree with Richard, you should supply more relevant info ;-) Mit freundlichen Grü

Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Richard Sims
>I have seen this on my system with 3590 E1A drives. >TSM server 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10 >I did an audit of my tapes & found about 20 that were in this status. >I checked them out & relabeled them. I now have it down to 2 tapes that >when TSM tries to use them it changes there status to private!

Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Bruce Kamp
ROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Tape status Does the actlog say somthing like" unable to read label of volume status is now changed to private to prevent reaccess" I also have to agree with Richard, you

Antwort: Re: Antwort: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Markus Veit
Kopie: Thema: Re: Antwort: T

Re: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Richard Sims
>I have a problem with my tapes in the LTO 3583 library. I checked in three >scratch tapes for my weekly backup schedule and they are now marked private. ... When posting questions to this technical forum, PLEASE supply detail! Without details we have nothing of substance to go on, and can only gu

Re: Antwort: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Bengani, Thabani
) --- -- - - LT2400L1 WEEKLY LTO 0.00.0 Empty Thanks. -Original Message- From: Markus Veit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 01:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Antwort: Tape status Hi Thabani what TSM server level are we talking about? What

Antwort: Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Markus Veit
Kopie: Thema: T

Tape status

2003-01-29 Thread Bengani, Thabani
Hi Tsmers, I have a problem with my tapes in the LTO 3583 library. I checked in three scratch tapes for my weekly backup schedule and they are now marked private. The problem is, there is no data in these tapes they are empty. Anyone who has had this before or know the solution to it. Thank you i

Re: Antwort: LTO Tape Status Full

2002-08-26 Thread Clarence Beukes
I saw this happening with TSM Server V4.2.1.0, but we then loaded a patch (V4.2.1.8). Clarence Beukes Advisory IT Specialist - Tivoli Certified Consultant Geomar SSO Mid Range and Application Support Discipline Location: IBM Park Sandton, IA2G Tel: +27 (0) 11 302-6622 Cell: +27 (0)

Re: Antwort: LTO Tape Status Full

2002-08-25 Thread Mark Stapleton
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Markus Veit > yes I have, it seems to be a bug in TSM, opened a call with support and they > said to run an audit volume fix=yes than a del vol with discard = yes. > That is not really an acceptable solution, but that was the hel

Antwort: LTO Tape Status Full

2002-08-16 Thread Markus Veit
ECTED] Kopie: Thema: LTO Tape Status

Re: LTO Tape Status Full

2002-08-15 Thread Camilo A. Marrugo
--- > From: "Jason Liang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 4:51 PM > Subject: Re: LTO Tape Status Full > > > > Camilo, > > > > You can delete this volume by

Re: LTO Tape Status Full

2002-08-15 Thread Jason Liang
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 4:51 PM Subject: Re: LTO Tape Status Full > Camilo, > > You can delete this volume by using > > Move data A00060 > > Jason Liang > > - O

Re: LTO Tape Status Full

2002-08-15 Thread bbullock
" command. Ben -Original Message- From: Jason Liang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 2:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LTO Tape Status Full Camilo, You can delete this volume by using Move data A00060 Jason Liang - Original Message - From: "C

Re: LTO Tape Status Full

2002-08-15 Thread Jason Liang
Camilo, You can delete this volume by using Move data A00060 Jason Liang - Original Message - From: "Camilo A. Marrugo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:48 AM Subject: LTO Tape Status Full > Do anyone ever seen w

LTO Tape Status Full

2002-08-15 Thread Camilo A. Marrugo
Do anyone ever seen when a tape goes to status full with 0.0% used. And every time that you try to move the data out of it, it gives you an: ANR2209W Volume A00060 contains no data. And if you try to delete the volume it gives you: ANR2406E DELETE VOLUME: Volume A00060 still contains data. Any