This develops to a historically important basis discussion.
Let us start with the definition of terms.
I find, the usage of the word "*REAL*" will often be misunderstood,
because there are different opinions about the meaning of this term.
Many will name the command-line interface the *real* thin
=> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:02:20 +0200, "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Can you sort your dsmadmc output?
Yes. Either with ORDER BY, or '| sort -k2 -t,'
> Can you scroll up and down through your dsmadmc results?
Yes. My terminal has 1000 lines scrollback, but I can make
Hi,
my 2 cents (since we moved from Schilling to Euro we have Cents too).
I think Tivoli should provide an Admin Interface for every level of
Admins.
Commandline, SQL, Web is fine for all Gurus (this are the guys who can
be
found on this list)
A *real* GUI (Windows, Java ...) should be for the o
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Can you sort your dsmadmc output?
Yep:
dsmadmc -id=xx -password=xx select volume_name,pct_utilized,stgpool_name
from volumes order by stgpool_name,pct_utilized
or by the use of various text manipulation tools such as sort, cut, etc.
D]
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 01:45
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: *Real* admin interface (Was: q vol f=g ??!?)
>
>
> From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > What might be another alternative is an MMC (Microsoft Management
> > Console)
>
this point during the interview!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 01:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *Real* admin interface (Was: q vol f=g ??!?)
From: Kamp, Bruce [m
lands
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 22 augustus 2003 15:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: q vol f=g ??!?
Hi Christo!
Yep! I'm still using the 3.1.08 Admin GUI. I still like it a WHOLE LOT
better than that hideous web admin inte
From: Kamp, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What might be another alternative is an MMC (Microsoft Management
> Console)
If you'll look *really carefully* at the TSM Management Console for
Windows, you're looking at an MMC.
All this talk about a "real" admin console leads me to a question
use of the addressee
and may contain information that is privileged and
confidential.
-Original Message-
From: Sascha Askani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,22. August 2003 20:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *Real* admin interface (Was: q vol f=g ??!?)
Oh my
Oh my, seems like I started a holy war (again) :)
Anyway, thanks for the answers, now I see clear ! I started using TSM with
Version 4.1.x, so I didn't know there once was a "real" GUI for *SM.
Nevertheless, I would REALLY like such a tool cause I don't like the web gui
either.
Greetings,
Sasch
What might be another alternative is an MMC (Microsoft Management
Console)
Bruce Kamp
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8/22/2003 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: *Real* admin interface (Was: q vol f=g ??!?)
>this "the old admin GUI is much better than
Having been part of three original joint studies with ESMS (which never saw
the light of day), WDSF (which morphed into ADSM) and finally another ADSM
project back in the late '80s and early '90s, I only had access to the line
mode admin client in the early days and I still use it to this day. Rea
Me, me! I still use the 3.1.0.8 Admin GUI - the ability to sort output,
then manipulate it, is incredibly valuable to me.
Nick Cassimatis
Technical Team Lead
Enterprise Storage Services - IBM Global Services South
877-462-6709 T/L 930-1720
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Think twice, type once.
>this "the old admin GUI is much better than the Web interface" subject=20
>pops up now and then.
>The poster of the first message always dreams of a Windows or Java GUI
>that supports the latest TSM server (btw I'm dreaming too).
>A few minutes later the list gets drowned by "me too" messages.
>
>
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Rupp, Vorarlberger Illwerke AG
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 August 2003 14:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *Real* admin interface (Was: q vol f=g ??!?)
Hello,
this "the old admin GUI is much better than the Web interface" subject
pops up n
Hello,
this "the old admin GUI is much better than the Web interface" subject
pops up now and then.
The poster of the first message always dreams of a Windows or Java GUI
that supports the latest TSM server (btw I'm dreaming too).
A few minutes later the list gets drowned by "me too" messages.
I
, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: q vol f=g ??!?
Hi Christo!
Yep! I'm still using the 3.1.08 Admin GUI. I still like it a WHOLE LOT
better than that hideous web admin interface. I'm also experiencing that
pools it stopped working after we upgraded
to 5.1.5.
Anyhow - the f=g is used by the old GUI.
Regards
Christo
--
> Hi to all the *SMers out there !
>
> I just stumbled over the output of "q vol f=g", actually
er we upgraded
to 5.1.5.
Anyhow - the f=g is used by the old GUI.
Regards
Christo
--
> Hi to all the *SMers out there !
>
> I just stumbled over the output of "q vol f=g", actually is was a typo, I
> got no
Hi to all the *SMers out there !
I just stumbled over the output of "q vol f=g", actually is was a typo, I
got no error Message but an output:
-
Volume Name: FRE660L1
Storage Pool Name: LTOPOOL
Device Class Name: LTOCLASS
Estimated Capacity (MB): 130,177.5
Pct Util: 2
20 matches
Mail list logo
