> (1) However, placement in the global cache requires strong
> name creation
> which would be a hassle to do on our various Access 97/2000 client
> machines. I have been unable to figure out how to simply use a private
> assembly for this purpose. Placing it in either
> WinNT\System32 or in the
>
yeah you are right and I knew that :), I just need to create a new FormatterSink, not
the Formatter I wasn't thinking when I was typing, need more caffine :)
Thanks again Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mike Woodring (DevelopMentor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:
Roy,
I believe they are using Access for much more than just a database engine.
Access deals with displaying forms, handling script-based code (although, I
have to admit, its VBA dialect is really stone age technology), and
displaying reports.
Many people actually use Access _with_ MSDE; they run
> ago, I was told the solution was to write a custom IFormatProvider
Sorry - mentioned the wrong interface name there. Meant to mention
I(Client/Server)FormatterSinkProvider; not IFormatProvider. That's what
I get for typing from memory :-)
BTW - with respect to your reply, you don't need to re
Don,
The thing is you can't really access the BinaryFormatter instance thats used by the
BinaryClient(Server)SerializerSink so you can't really set the SurrogateSelector
property :)
John
-Original Message-
From: Browning, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:20 P
How about replacing Access with MSDE?
Roy Forkner
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Melvin
Bernstein
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET Remoting and Access
>
> Take a look at the SurrogateSelector property on the
> BinaryFormatter, it allows you to set the Selector used
> during the serialization phase...
>
But to do this, you need to have a reference to the formatter that's
going to be used. When you're just doing object persistence, this is
easy -
I was afraid this was going to be the answer, damn, creating my own formatter that
does pretty much does the same thing as the BinaryFormatter just so that I can pass in
Surragates and Binders seems to be an overkill.
I'll try using Reflection and see if I can access the Formatter from CoreChann
Thanks Howard and Ray,
The idea of a custom control (not a user control, but a full-blown designer
visible control) is very appealing. I was wondering, however, how to give
the data designer an idea to use my control in place of a connection object.
Would simply implementing IDbConnection suffice
I haven't done this myself, but when I asked the same question a while
ago, I was told the solution was to write a custom IFormatProvider
implementation and register it in your .config file (or
programmatically) instead of the built-in format provider.
So instead of listing the built-in formatter
> This may be a stupid question, I need to pass a Surrogate
> Selector to the BinaryFormatter that is used by the Remoting
> infrastructure, any ideas on how this can be done. I thought
> maybe the BinaryClientFormatterSink or the
> BinaryServerFormatterSink would have a property that allows
> me a
> (1) However, placement in the global cache requires strong
> name creation which would be a hassle to do on our various
> Access 97/2000 client machines. I have been unable to figure
> out how to simply use a private assembly for this purpose.
> Placing it in either WinNT\System32 or in the Acces
You might want to take a look at creating a User Control of your own that
you could use for your data connections.
-Original Message-
From: Howard Pinsley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] IDE and SqlConnecti
I posted this to the .NET-CLR list about 5 days ago but no one has
responded ...
Our shop is still in the stone age technologically, using Access (often
Access 97) in combination with SQL Server for many projects. I am trying to
get our group to move to .NET, skipping over COM. To that end, I have
>>>
Now the actual question: is there a way to add a SqlConnection object (or
possibly another class, but implementing the proper interface) that is
accessible by the VS IDE designer, I can see it on the design surface, use
it at design time, and yet at runtime I want to be able to "replace" - or
"
I just implemented a scheme like this using a context attribute to add
interception code into cross-context calls. There's a great article [1] by
Juval Lowy in the March issue of MSDN that shows how to do this. Mike
Woodring also has some sample code [2] on the DevelopMentor site that
illustrates
This may be a stupid question, I need to pass a Surrogate Selector to the
BinaryFormatter that is used by the Remoting infrastructure, any ideas on how this can
be done. I thought maybe the BinaryClientFormatterSink or the
BinaryServerFormatterSink would have a property that allows me access to
I have an application that uses WinForms for the client and an application
server. These two tiers communicate through Remoting.
I need to maintain some form of user session concept (for authentication
purposes, as well as to preserve across-call information on the server
side). There is a system
Hi all,
I sent this a few days ago to the CSharpNET list at yahoogroups but nobody
sent back a response. Since the issue is not trivial, and I'm sure I am not
the only one interested in a solution, maybe some of the folks in this group
will be able to help... (like for Chris Sells, a famous guru
19 matches
Mail list logo