On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:31:48 -0800
"Philippe M. Chiasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just noticed that by default, Fedore Core ships httpd.conf with this
> snippet:
>
> #
> # Don't give away too much information about all the subcomponents
> # we are running. Comment out this line if you don
> > What technique to help the scanners were you thinking about?
>
> How about my X-Powered-By suggestion for a while ago ?
>
> http://perl.apache.org/advocacy/issues.html#X_Powered_By
>
i think that's a great idea.
-
To unsub
Stas Bekman wrote:
Frank Wiles wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:47:26 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
for some reason we still don't have the numbers for Oct 2004 from
netcraft but regardless it's easy to see that the stats are getting
worse all the time:
http://perl.apache.org/outstandin
Frank Wiles wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 17:59:14 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's certainly possible. But you probably want to have a separate
effort and just reuse the infrustructure of TPF for collecting money?
Correct. I don't think it would hurt to have it listed among th
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 17:59:14 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's certainly possible. But you probably want to have a separate
> effort and just reuse the infrustructure of TPF for collecting money?
Correct. I don't think it would hurt to have it listed among the
other Perl
Frank Wiles wrote:
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 19:33:22 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I'm sure many of you have heard about the SpreadFirefox.com
campaign to do advertising via donations. I have been waiting for
long time to see a project do this, as I think it's a great way
to get
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 19:33:22 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I'm sure many of you have heard about the SpreadFirefox.com
> > campaign to do advertising via donations. I have been waiting for
> > long time to see a project do this, as I think it's a great way
> > to get
Frank Wiles wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 23:35:34 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, Eric, but, my point was to try to stir
again the advocacy efforts which have quickly died since Aug. Not
really to figure out the exact number of users, which is not really
feasi
Frank Wiles wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 23:46:12 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, but I still want to hear first, what do you have on your mind,
that you want to propose to users?
A quick howto on the website for how to configure ServerToken so
that it will be detected by Net
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 23:35:34 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, Eric, but, my point was to try to stir
> again the advocacy efforts which have quickly died since Aug. Not
> really to figure out the exact number of users, which is not really
> feasible, IMHO.
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 23:46:12 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, but I still want to hear first, what do you have on your mind,
> that you want to propose to users?
A quick howto on the website for how to configure ServerToken so
that it will be detected by NetCraft.
> >
Frank Wiles wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:18:47 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You mean the decline is because more and more people move to the
front-/back-end setup, and people aren't just moving to php?
Oh I'm sure some of the decline is people moving to PHP, Python,
Java, e
Eric wrote:
Hi,
This may be a horrible suggestion. But I have seen one or two install
programs ask if they can send debugging info back to the source.
Certainly PHP does this when there are errors with tests.
What if at the conclusion of all of the tests, there was a prompt to ask
something like
Hi,
This may be a horrible suggestion. But I have seen one or two install
programs ask if they can send debugging info back to the source. Certainly
PHP does this when there are errors with tests.
What if at the conclusion of all of the tests, there was a prompt to ask
something like,"Count me a
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:18:47 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean the decline is because more and more people move to the
> front-/back-end setup, and people aren't just moving to php?
Oh I'm sure some of the decline is people moving to PHP, Python,
Java, etc... but I don
Frank Wiles wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:47:26 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
for some reason we still don't have the numbers for Oct 2004 from
netcraft but regardless it's easy to see that the stats are getting
worse all the time:
http://perl.apache.org/outstanding/stats/securitysp
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:47:26 -0500
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for some reason we still don't have the numbers for Oct 2004 from
> netcraft but regardless it's easy to see that the stats are getting
> worse all the time:
>
> http://perl.apache.org/outstanding/stats/securityspace.html
for some reason we still don't have the numbers for Oct 2004 from netcraft
but regardless it's easy to see that the stats are getting worse all the time:
http://perl.apache.org/outstanding/stats/securityspace.html
http://perl.apache.org/outstanding/stats/netcraft.html
--
_
18 matches
Mail list logo
