Re: [AFMUG] Web Interface for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Cameron Camp
I wrote a CLI “wizard” that steps you thought it, use parts of it if you find useful. It creates a Debian style structure where you can enable/disable available zones if you want, which makes it easier to manage. You create a db.example.com example zone, and then the script copies and modifies i

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP use with Itelite-sector-xl-2.45dualband-2xdual

2015-05-23 Thread Josh Luthman
I haven't tried it and it sounds like Chuck is *ahem* chucking them off the tower. Can't comment on the latter :) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 23, 2015 11:37 PM, "Paul McCall" wrote: > Well, obviously the dual band part i

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Stefan Englhardt
We use powerdns/mysql as authorative ns. And feed it from our customer db with scripts. Customer db is mysql feeded by a access frontend. With access it is very easy to build a frontend. You might connect to the powerdns database directly with access/odbc. Ursprüngliche Nachricht -

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP use with Itelite-sector-xl-2.45dualband-2xdual

2015-05-23 Thread Paul McCall
Well, obviously the dual band part is attractive… was just wondering if an 1/16” steel backing would help it. Would cost much, and still retains the lesser tower rent per month. 4 extra sectors = $ 200+ per month Anybody using a competitors dual band product successfully From: Af [mailto:a

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP use with Itelite-sector-xl-2.45dualband-2xdual

2015-05-23 Thread Jaime Solorza
MTI makes good antennas Jaime Solorza On May 23, 2015 3:22 PM, "Paul McCall" wrote: > We are curious to see how this antenna compares in a 4 sector > arrangement with the Cambium ePMP APs, GPS synced? > > > http://www.itelite.net/en/Katalog/Multi-Band-Antennas//SECTOR-XL-245dual-band2xdual-HV.h

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP use with Itelite-sector-xl-2.45dualband-2xdual

2015-05-23 Thread Josh Luthman
Throw it off the tower and put something else in its place? Short of building a big metal wall (which may not work, just guessing) I'm not sure what you could do. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Pau

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP use with Itelite-sector-xl-2.45dualband-2xdual

2015-05-23 Thread Paul McCall
Is there a way to further shield the back to make it acceptable ? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck Hogg Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 8:24 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP use with Itelite-sector-xl-2.45dualband-2xdual We're abandoning the use of these in site

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Robbie Wright
We've been super happy with fmDNS in FacileManager. Great gui for bind. Same here On May 23, 2015 4:40:49 PM AKDT, Paul Stewart wrote: > > No, not saying web interfaces are bad … just that I work on CLI all day > long for various things, and I find it just as fast (generally speaking) > > > > *Fr

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread David Milholen
I do both depending what host machine I am on. On 5/23/2015 7:40 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: No, not saying web interfaces are bad … just that I work on CLI all day long for various things, and I find it just as fast (generally speaking) *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *J

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread David Milholen
No worries, Used since 2003 and delt with growing pains but thanks to the community listening to us they have made great improvements since. I have always liked it and made it work and helped with contributions to it. On 5/23/2015 5:22 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: Every time somebody says web

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Josh Reynolds
Same here On May 23, 2015 4:40:49 PM AKDT, Paul Stewart wrote: >No, not saying web interfaces are bad … just that I work on CLI all day >long for various things, and I find it just as fast (generally >speaking) > > > >From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman >Sent: Saturd

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Paul Stewart
No, not saying web interfaces are bad … just that I work on CLI all day long for various things, and I find it just as fast (generally speaking) From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 7:11 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web inter

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP use with Itelite-sector-xl-2.45dualband-2xdual

2015-05-23 Thread Chuck Hogg
We're abandoning the use of these in sites. 2.4 in V/H is the first problem. F/B as JL suggested. The antenna itself is not at the higher level of desirability, but in a pinch where you might need to retain space and such it might work out ok. I wouldn't put it in my WISP anymore though. Regar

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP use with Itelite-sector-xl-2.45dualband-2xdual

2015-05-23 Thread Mathew Howard
It helps to use the version with the built in enclosure... it gets you an extra layer of metal on the back that kind of works as shielding. On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Glen Waldrop wrote: > I have some ITElite 2.4GHz sectors, still on the ground due to the poor > F/B ratio. > > Gain is rea

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Ken Hohhof
I think the main difficulty of editing BIND zone and config files from the CLI is actually backup and error checking. If you religiously save the previous version (in case you really screw up) and check named.log afterward, that’s the big thing. Because just one tiny error will keep the zone f

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Josh Luthman
I find 75% CLI is faster... But I can type faster than I can click. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 23, 2015 7:16 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > Some (very few) things are easier via CLI vs. web interface. BIND configs > are not

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Mike Hammett
Some (very few) things are easier via CLI vs. web interface. BIND configs are not one of these things. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Josh Luthman" T

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Josh Luthman
You prefer adding zone config CLI? Are these web interfaces that bad? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 23, 2015 7:08 PM, "Paul Stewart" wrote: > Webmin is simple and works – would be quite useful if someone needed a web > inte

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Paul Stewart
Webmin is simple and works – would be quite useful if someone needed a web interface for BIND. Personally much prefer CLI for that kind of stuff…. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 6:22 PM To: af@afmug.com; Ken Hohhof Subject: Re: [

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Cassidy B. Larson
We run a PowerDNS master and have our public authoritative BINDs pull everything as slaves from the private PowerDNS master. Our zones are kept in a MySQL database for PowerDNS. PowerDNS has a couple of web editors, this one looks simple and probably does the job: http://www.powerdns-gui.org/ I t

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Josh Reynolds
Every time somebody says webmin, I die a little inside. :( On May 23, 2015 2:21:13 PM AKDT, Ken Hohhof wrote: >There’s always webmin. > >From: Josh Reynolds >Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 5:09 PM >To: af@afmug.com ; Josh Luthman >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND > >GestioIP can expor

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Ken Hohhof
There’s always webmin. From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 5:09 PM To: af@afmug.com ; Josh Luthman Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND GestioIP can export DNS to bind config On May 23, 2015 2:04:28 PM AKDT, Josh Luthman wrote: Any suggestions for this? I'm tired

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP use with Itelite-sector-xl-2.45dualband-2xdual

2015-05-23 Thread Glen Waldrop
I have some ITElite 2.4GHz sectors, still on the ground due to the poor F/B ratio. Gain is really good in testing though. I'm going to put something else up to shield the back. - Original Message - From: Josh Luthman To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 4:35 PM Su

Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Josh Reynolds
GestioIP can export DNS to bind config On May 23, 2015 2:04:28 PM AKDT, Josh Luthman wrote: >Any suggestions for this? > >I'm tired of having to SSH in and type things out. I'd love to have >something that makes adding zones less painful and more pretty. >There's >just too big of a list to mak

[AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND

2015-05-23 Thread Josh Luthman
Any suggestions for this? I'm tired of having to SSH in and type things out. I'd love to have something that makes adding zones less painful and more pretty. There's just too big of a list to make a good decision... http://www.debianadmin.com/bind-dns-server-web-interfacefrontend-or-gui-tools.ht

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP use with Itelite-sector-xl-2.45dualband-2xdual

2015-05-23 Thread Josh Luthman
The F/B ratio is shit. Complete shit. Garbage. Just awful. I've got several sites where the 180* actually has more gain than front facing (ie I hear east better than west while being a mile or two west of the tower). The hardware is a joke, but workable. Forward 5 GHz gain seems about right.

[AFMUG] ePMP use with Itelite-sector-xl-2.45dualband-2xdual

2015-05-23 Thread Paul McCall
We are curious to see how this antenna compares in a 4 sector arrangement with the Cambium ePMP APs, GPS synced? http://www.itelite.net/en/Katalog/Multi-Band-Antennas//SECTOR-XL-245dual-band2xdual-HV.html

[AFMUG] Failed CNUT upgrade to 12.1

2015-05-23 Thread TJ Trout
So I just tried to upgrade some FSK SM's, I wasn't sure on the upgrade path and I was upgrading some 10.3.2 and 10.5 SM's so I decided to go to 12.1 then to 13.2/3 and I though that would be safe, maybe I should have gone to 11.2 then 12.1 then 13.2... Anyway I just did 2 as a test, the 10.5 came

Re: [AFMUG] OT Movie Review

2015-05-23 Thread Paul McCall
Now, if was Men in Tights meets Spaceballs, you might have something :) From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 11:43 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Movie Review It is kinda like Men In Black meets The Time Machine meets Conspirac

Re: [AFMUG] PRM24 FOR SALE

2015-05-23 Thread Paul McCall
Yippie! I bought them and will cut them in half :) That worked fine for us and they fit in the space we needed it to. LOL Paul -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Traci Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 11:28 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] PRM24 FOR S

Re: [AFMUG] OT Movie Review

2015-05-23 Thread Chuck McCown
It is kinda like Men In Black meets The Time Machine meets Conspiracy Theory I guess. Some silly implausible stuff but I though it was great fun for the most part. Loved the jet pack made out of old Electrolux vacuum cleaners. Safe for kids. From: Bill Prince Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 8:34 AM

Re: [AFMUG] OT Movie Review

2015-05-23 Thread Bill Prince
The review in our local rag was not so kind. bp On 5/22/2015 5:44 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: Tomorrow Land - Two Thumbs Up It does have an environmentalist theme but it has the doom and gloom preachers being the bad guys and that things are fixable.

Re: [AFMUG] NEMA enclosure with GFCI outlet

2015-05-23 Thread Josh Luthman
Thanks!!! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 23, 2015 8:17 AM, "Ken Hohhof" wrote: > http://www.alliedelec.com/phoenix-contact-5602192/70208161/ > > > *From:* Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Friday, May 22, 2015 9:22 PM > *To:* af@afm

Re: [AFMUG] NEMA enclosure with GFCI outlet

2015-05-23 Thread Ken Hohhof
http://www.alliedelec.com/phoenix-contact-5602192/70208161/ From: Josh Luthman Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 9:22 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] NEMA enclosure with GFCI outlet Oh no I definitely do, remember I'm passing these costs to the customer! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 D