Sterling, correct me if I'm wrong, but it's Plat about the most difficult
system to setup, of all billing systems available on the wisp market? =)
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
> For me it's more about the time it takes to do it. There a
For me it's more about the time it takes to do it. There are aspects of the
install I cannot figure out. I asked them for deployment support and I was told
they don't offer it. Another guy told me he'd do it for more than $2k.
My current system just double, triple, or quadruple charged my autop
Only quickly and easily if you are a experienced IT wizard, if your just a
dumb RF hand it's a insurmountable task
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Sterling Jacobson
wrote:
> Platypus can be deployed easily and quickly.
>
> Just pay them for the services to set it up etc.
>
> They don't cost muc
Platypus can be deployed easily and quickly.
Just pay them for the services to set it up etc.
They don't cost much to do that.
A few hundred dollars and you are completely up and running.
Doesn't cost too much for licensing monthly either.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun.
I'm looking for a good billing solution that is cheap and I can have up in
running immediately.
I've had far too many issues with my current billing system.
I need something turnkey and cheap. My WISP is a fairly small operation.
I am not willing to pay per sub, especially if there is a minim
It would allow back-to-back frequency reuse.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Jaime Solorza
wrote:
> What does the GPS do for a 2.4GHz point to point ? I have not played with
> OS so I have no idea. Thanks in advance.
>
It syncs them if you have multiple links. otherwise, I think about all it
does is set the clock and location.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Jaime Solorza
wrote:
> What does the GPS do for a 2.4GHz point to point ? I have not played with
> OS so I have no idea. Thanks in advance.
>
What does the GPS do for a 2.4GHz point to point ? I have not played with
OS so I have no idea. Thanks in advance.
When Mexican President visited a penitentiary earlier this year in Cd.
Juarez, the jammers they used knocked service out on US side for two
hours... The site was about 2 miles from Border!!! Chapelle should hire
Mexico secret service to jam phones at show...lol
On Dec 3, 2015 7:53 PM, "Jason McKe
I'm not sure how they're going to get people to do this. You could just
claim that you don't have a phone on you.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/how-dave-chappelle-is-creating-844886
>
>
> http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/10/i-let-y
Very Taon of you
On Dec 3, 2015 11:06 AM, "Sam Lambie" wrote:
> I just donated 100 5.2 FSK Boards to a local artist to make a sculpture
> with them.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Sean Heskett wrote:
>
>> Start a wisp in Costa Rica
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, December 2, 2015, That One
Thanks
On Dec 3, 2015 6:45 PM, "Jaime Fink" wrote:
> Pretty pic Jaime!
>
> Cheers,
>
> The other Jaime
>
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Jaime Solorza
> wrote:
>
> My first Mimosa install. Will be a two mile shot. All masts, clamps and
> white tape provided by client. Once aligned I fed excess
Cool, thanks for the help George!
I'm gonna give the planet one a try, I'll report back with the results.
Hopefully cambium will chime in with a solution too.
-Sean
On Thursday, December 3, 2015, George Skorup wrote:
> Anything 802.3at compliant should work just fine. Switch port, injector,
>
Pretty pic Jaime!
Cheers,
The other Jaime
On Dec 3, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Jaime Solorza
mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
My first Mimosa install. Will be a two mile shot. All masts, clamps and
white tape provided by client. Once aligned I fed excess cable back and used
ties plus th
Yes. You cannot have single quotes in the device name. I tried that once
and the radio acted really stupid. None of the config would display. For
example, I changed it from "Bob's House" to "Bobs House" and it was sane
again.
Almost the same thing on Canopy, just a little bit smarter about it.
I sometimes have this sort of experience if I just upgraded firmware and
have the new [or old] files cached. I do a shift+f5 refresh before
configuring if things look fishy.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Have any of you seen where most of a Force 110's setting fields are
It was something I had intentionally put into a field that the ePMP firmware
didn't seem to like, so was persistent until a backup, edit, restore.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Orig
Binary backups are your friend...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I think it was related to a single quote ' in some of the fields of the
> config. I dumped the config, edited t
I think it was related to a single quote ' in some of the fields of the config.
I dumped the config, edited them out and now it seems to be fine.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Origi
Anything 802.3at compliant should work just fine. Switch port, injector,
whatever.
We've installed some Exalt ExtendAir G2 radios which are also 3at
compliant. Nice low power consumption. The OEM injector is a Phihong
POE36U-1AT-R. I'm not sure if the -R means reverse polarity though.
Could b
Awesome, thanks!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:13 PM, George Skorup wrote:
> I've found it to be fairly accurate. Not like UBNT's -95 noise floor.
> That's totally worthless.
>
>
> On 12/3/2015 7:09 PM, J
I've found it to be fairly accurate. Not like UBNT's -95 noise floor.
That's totally worthless.
On 12/3/2015 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Does anyone know if the SNR is worthwhile information or is it based
off 802.11 noise?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Does anyone know if the SNR is worthwhile information or is it based off
802.11 noise?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
so based on what George said this will work?
http://planetechusa.com/ieee-802-3at-gigabit-high-power-over-ethernet-injector-mid-span.html
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:15 PM, George Skorup wrote:
> It's 3at on the input and 3af on the secondary port output. You might be
> able to get away with a 3af
Never had a problem, but keep in mind I use one PC to update from shipped
firmware to latest and then slap on a template.
Then I use the laptop in the truck to do everything else on site.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Dec
the specs are in the Rocket Prism AP datasheet
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Paul McCall wrote:
> Looking to break some 120 sector coverage APs into smaller chunks, and
> recall this looked like a good option.
>
>
>
> Don’t see it on their website… probably not a good sign. Anybody have a
> s
ye, you have to be ready for it, we have the process mostly automated using
formstack + cudasign + zappier to bring it all together (backend wise)
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc <
t...@franklinisp.net> wrote:
> Gino,
>
>
>
> We ran ads on Facebook as we
I saw something like that happen, but it went back to normal after I
reloaded the interface... or maybe I had to reboot it, I don't remember for
sure.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Have any of you seen where most of a Force 110's setting fields are blank
> when you login
Have any of you seen where most of a Force 110's setting fields are blank when
you login and when you go to save it after entering everything, it wants to
reboot to the 192.168.0.2 address? That's clearly not what I have entered, but
that's what it wants to use.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelli
It's 25dBi. If you need a couple more dB to make the link work, walk
away, or use a connectorized and a 2' dish which of course many
customers won't want.
On 12/3/2015 5:37 PM, Paul McCall wrote:
Better dB than the KP dish?
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
It's 3at on the input and 3af on the secondary port output. You might be
able to get away with a 3af supply for the input which is 15W if you're
not using the second output, but then again, the 450i 5GHz SM itself
uses >14W, IIRC, so it'd be close.
On 12/3/2015 3:59 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
hi
Better dB than the KP dish?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 6:36 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180
Wow seriously you need to pick one up...or just pick up Force200.
Josh Luthman
Office:
Wow seriously you need to pick one up...or just pick up Force200.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Paul McCall wrote:
> nope
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthma
nope
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 5:59 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180
You haven't used any Force110, Paul?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Sui
You haven't used any Force110, Paul?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Paul McCall wrote:
> Hmmm… my only point of reference is the original Force product which was
> definitely not easy.
>
>
>
> Can y
Possibly.
From: Paul McCall
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180
Hmmm… my only point of reference is the original Force product which was
definitely not easy.
Can you sneak a couple more dB out of a Beehive Supe
Hmmm… my only point of reference is the original Force product which was
definitely not easy.
Can you sneak a couple more dB out of a Beehive Superdish is a good question
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 5:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com
S
$150 per load watt
From: TJ Trout
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:35 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Solar site bill of materials
Does anyone have an example bill of materials for a small solar site with like
three radios?
Does anyone have an example bill of materials for a small solar site with
like three radios?
No need to say sorry, I agree. That is the way I would do it too.
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180
Force 200. Way easier than reflectors. Sorry :(
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
Well, I wouldn't buy it... using a Force 200 (or 110) is cheaper, easier
and smaller than using a separate reflector, so it just doesn't make sense
to me.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
> Yes, and the real question is, would someone buy my product or the Cambium
> 200? Is i
Force 200. Way easier than reflectors. Sorry :(
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 3, 2015 5:14 PM, "Chuck McCown" wrote:
> Yes, and the real question is, would someone buy my product or the Cambium
> 200? Is it worth doing.
>
Yes, and the real question is, would someone buy my product or the Cambium 200?
Is it worth doing.
From: Mathew Howard
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:03 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180
You would have to make a completely new holder, wouldn't you?
On T
You would have to make a completely new holder, wouldn't you?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
> I can make it work, but I have yet to test with one.
>
> *From:* Jeff Broadwick - Lists
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 03, 2015 2:26 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG]
I can make it work, but I have yet to test with one.
From: Jeff Broadwick - Lists
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 2:26 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180
No, it mounts sideways (thus the 180 name). Likely won't work with existing
reflectors.
Jeff
hi ken,
this is for the 5Ghz 450i integrated SM
regular canopy POE doesn't work, nor does epmp.
-sean
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Which specific variant of 450i SM?
>
> I’m pretty sure I read that at least for the 900 MHz version, it could be
> powered from a standard
It's greater gain, definitely more range. Also a more vertical spread and
less horizontal, which means you'll pick up less noise across the horizon
(and more vertically but not many towers are stacked :)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 4537
Hey, it worked in my head! :-)
Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 4:27 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Dude 180* would mean it's upside down, not sideways! LOL!
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552
You are supposed to get greater distance with the 180 than the past integrated
SM because of their new floating antenna design. Has anyone tested that out?
Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 4:37
The 900mhz 450i SM does use a standard Canopy PoE, but I'm pretty sure that
isn't true of the 5ghz SM.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Which specific variant of 450i SM?
>
> I’m pretty sure I read that at least for the 900 MHz version, it could be
> powered from a standard 29
Supposed to be available some time after Dec. 15.
Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>
> Why not just use Force 110s instead of reflectors? aside from the fact that
Which specific variant of 450i SM?
I’m pretty sure I read that at least for the 900 MHz version, it could be
powered from a standard 29.5V Canopy POE. Which obviously is important if you
are swapping out existing FSK customers.
This may not be true for the 5 GHz variant, I don’t know.
Obvious
Use an 802.3at (maybe af) POE?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
> seriously?!?!
>
> the only way to power an new 450i SM is with a $100 POE!!! that's
> ridiculous especially when
Why not just use Force 110s instead of reflectors? aside from the fact that
you can't actually get 110s right now...
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Paul McCall wrote:
> Oh wow…maybe I am missing something.
>
>
>
> If the KP dish with standard SM does SM dB + 9 dB, and the Force 180 (no
> re
I think they're expecting you to use Force180 for nearby customers and
Force200 for farther customers...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Paul McCall wrote:
> Oh wow…maybe I am missing something.
That'd be the $35 option that Mark listed... which apparently isn't
available yet.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
> seriously?!?!
>
> the only way to power an new 450i SM is with a $100 POE!!! that's
> ridiculous especially when an ePMP or UBNT CPE is less than $100 TOTAL!!
What's wrong with them? We are doing lots of deployments. Price?
Tyson Burris, President
Internet Communications Inc.
739 Commerce Dr.
Franklin, IN 46131
317-738-0320 Daytime #
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #
Online: www.surfici.net
Forgive the brevity, the typos and my fat fingers!
> On
seriously?!?!
the only way to power an new 450i SM is with a $100 POE!!! that's
ridiculous especially when an ePMP or UBNT CPE is less than $100 TOTAL!!!
come on cambium...there has to be a better/cheeper option.
-sean
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Super WISP wrote:
> Here are the power s
Oh wow…maybe I am missing something.
If the KP dish with standard SM does SM dB + 9 dB, and the Force 180 (no
reflector) does standard SM + 3db, did we just lose 6dB of gain (NET) if we
can’t use reflectors?
Paul
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursd
Dude 180* would mean it's upside down, not sideways! LOL!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists
wrote:
> No, it mounts sideways (thus the 180 name). Likely won't work with
> existin
No, it mounts sideways (thus the 180 name). Likely won't work with existing
reflectors.
Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 4:24 PM, Paul McCall wrote:
>
> Does the Force180 have the same form fa
It's turned 90*. I don't know if KP tested the reflector with it, but I
would safely assume it won't illuminate as well as previous. It uses the
same holder but will also use a new one that doesn't suck.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45
No, it's roughly the same size, but it's rotated 90 degrees. I doubt it
would work with any of the existing reflectors.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Paul McCall wrote:
> Does the Force180 have the same form factor as the previous integrated
> unit? Does it use the same KP performance reflec
Here are the power supply options. Pricing is MSRP.
N65L001B
C65L002B
N00L034A
$80
$380
$35
56 VDC, 60W supply
Enhanced AC+DC Power Injector
56 VDC, 30W supply (available soon)
N65L003A
N65L004AN65L005A
$20
$20
$20
US Line Cord Fig 8 (IEC-60320 Type C7)
UK Line Cord
Does the Force180 have the same form factor as the previous integrated unit?
Does it use the same KP performance reflector? Same holder, etc.?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 5:01 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integr
Doesn't the 5ghz 450i need 48v? They're supposed to be 802.3at compliant,
so there's gotta be something cheaper than $80 out there.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
> thats what i thought!
>
> It didn't power the SM that i tried it on
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Josh L
thats what i thought!
It didn't power the SM that i tried it on
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Can't you use the Epmp POE?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Dec 3, 2015 4:06 PM, "Sean Heskett"
Anyone interested in purchasing access points and subscriber modules.
Can't you use the Epmp POE?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 3, 2015 4:06 PM, "Sean Heskett" wrote:
> what is the part number for the POE to use with the SMs?
>
> our vendor is telling us to use the PTP650 POE adapter (which wo
what is the part number for the POE to use with the SMs?
our vendor is telling us to use the PTP650 POE adapter (which works) but
it's (MSRP) $80 + $20 for the USA AC cord. something ain't right!?!?
this is what were were told to use:
N65L001B PTP650 Spare AC Power Injector (Old P/N N65L
Looking to break some 120 sector coverage APs into smaller chunks, and recall
this looked like a good option.
Don't see it on their website... probably not a good sign. Anybody have a spec
sheet at least?
Paul
Paul McCall, Pres.
PDMNet / Florida Broadband
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL
I didn't because it varies depending on the exact type of cable, install
methods, etc etc etc.
On Dec 3, 2015 11:02 AM, "Josh Luthman" wrote:
> If you have longer cable runs you want rev I. I don't think Forrest
> specified the lengths...
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552
Yes, separate injectors for both would be needed.
I hate the meanwell SD series as it often shuts down when briefly
overloaded, such as during power on inrush loads, use the rsd instead.
On Dec 3, 2015 10:46 AM, "Sam Lambie" wrote:
> I assume that I will need a separate SyncInjector for the 4
All revision h and later syncinjectors will handle 48V which is needed for
the 450i.
At 48V and longer cable runs, there is an issue where the 450i gets two
pulses each second from the syncinjector due to an interaction between the
nice, sharp sync pulse edge, a long cable, and the radio. This in
Thanks!
On 12/3/2015 1:19 PM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
The current model numbers are 200SSH, and 600SSH.
We are still producing both of these products.
(The “H” became a thing in 2011, when we split from the mothership)
Matt
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof
*S
Hijacker
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:59 AM, George Skorup wrote:
> All 450i radios (except the 900SM) is 802.3at compliant. Then I guess the
> question is, will the CTM port do sync-over-power in 3at mode? My guess is
> no. You'll have to do the pin swapping that Cambium recommends for the
> CMM4
All 450i radios (except the 900SM) is 802.3at compliant. Then I guess
the question is, will the CTM port do sync-over-power in 3at mode? My
guess is no. You'll have to do the pin swapping that Cambium recommends
for the CMM4. Then tell your CTM that the port is 320/430 mode. But you
won't get g
It is not related in any way to Sprint. That assumption shows what I mean about
the misleading emails – they make it appear they are part of other
efforts/alliances/partnerships, etc. with companies they mention in their
blasts, such as Sprint and Telrad.
Patrick Leary, Telrad
727-501-3735
Fro
Yes, a Meanwell PSU works just fine. Can't wait to hang the AP
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> I’m thinking more along the lines that my first test site for 450i 900 MHz
> will be at a tower where I already have a CTM-2 master + slave and if it
> works out it will be replaci
The current model numbers are 200SSH, and 600SSH.
We are still producing both of these products.
(The “H” became a thing in 2011, when we split from the mothership)
Matt
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 11:50 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Su
I’m thinking more along the lines that my first test site for 450i 900 MHz will
be at a tower where I already have a CTM-2 master + slave and if it works out
it will be replacing a 900 FSK sector that is currently powered from the CTM-2.
So I was kind of hijacking your thread.
From: Sam Lambie
Would be nice if that did sync on all modes. But I already have a fair
amount of PF gear at this site. And I like it.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> H, what about a Last Mile Gear CTM-2?
>
> It has 5 different modes. A is for 29.5V Cambium, B is for 56V Cambium
> 320 a
H, what about a Last Mile Gear CTM-2?
It has 5 different modes. A is for 29.5V Cambium, B is for 56V Cambium 320 and
430, and then there are 3 modes C/D/E for various forms of 802.3at. Should I
assume one of these will power a 450i AP? What about timing, the documentation
is not clear wh
I just donated 100 5.2 FSK Boards to a local artist to make a sculpture
with them.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Sean Heskett wrote:
> Start a wisp in Costa Rica
>
> ;-)
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 2, 2015, That One Guy /sarcasm <
> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 320, 450 3ghz, or epm
I am at less than 100'
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> If you have longer cable runs you want rev I. I don't think Forrest
> specified the lengths...
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Dec 3,
Forrest, do you have any input on the cable lengths?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Sam Lambie wrote:
> I am at less than 100'
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Josh Luthman > wrote:
>
>> If you have longer cable runs you want rev I. I don't think Forrest
>> specified the lengths...
>>
If you have longer cable runs you want rev I. I don't think Forrest
specified the lengths...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 3, 2015 12:42 PM, "Josh Baird" wrote:
> The SyncInjector can take up to ~57V (ignore the label). Yo
FWIW, I have an overstock list from Mark Chamerlik at WAV showing 3 in stock in
Canada.
From: Jeff Broadwick - Lists
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 11:35 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 200 SSD
The only SSD part on their price list is the 600SSD.
Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Techn
I assume that I will need a separate SyncInjector for the 450i then as I
have 450's in the mix as well. Would a Meanwell SD 120-48 PSU Work?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Josh Baird wrote:
> The SyncInjector can take up to ~57V (ignore the label). You will need to
> power it with 48V to powe
The SyncInjector can take up to ~57V (ignore the label). You will need to
power it with 48V to power the 450i.
There are problems with cable distance on SyncInjectors prior to H1 (I
beileve). Depending on your cable distance, you may or may not see an
issue from what I understand.
Josh
On Thu,
After looking at some of the earlier posts, I can't really determine if I
can use the 450i AP on a gigabit syncinjector. It appears that it want a
48vdc power supply. What is the best way to set this up? Or will it
actually accept the 29 vdc power supply on the SyncInjector?
Sam
--
--
*Sam Lamb
The only SSD part on their price list is the 600SSD.
Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> Is the Cambium 200SSD (DC Surge Protector for CMM4) still a thing?
>
> We
Is the Cambium 200SSD (DC Surge Protector for CMM4) still a thing?
We had a vendor tell us they don't exist anymore.
Start a wisp in Costa Rica
;-)
On Wednesday, December 2, 2015, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 320, 450 3ghz, or epmp 5ghz depending on the site
>
> Ive thought about moving it to small sites for 2 mile coverage for a few
> customers, but the epmp 5ghz has the same p
You can but you already know you have to license each link. If your the only
one around it would be real easy to maximize how many links are off a tower.
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
> I wonder what the chance of getting caught
Just because you have Altairs as door stops? Ducking
On Dec 3, 2015 7:59 AM, "Chuck McCown" wrote:
> I wonder what the chance of getting caught reusing your own 18 Ghz pair
> multiple times within a 5 mile radius would be not that anyone would
> ever actually try that
>
> -Original
WUPN has a switch to control whether updates are shared locally on your
LAN (probably a good thing), or whether they are shared over the WAN
(probably not so good a thing).
bp
On 12/3/2015 7:15 AM, Stefan Englhardt wrote:
Dont forget to disable the Windows Update Peer Networking. If not MS
> Windows Update Peer Networking
Is that abbreviated WUPN? As in if you disable it, you’ll get a WUPN?
From: Stefan Englhardt
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 9:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Win 10
They have done a lot of optimizations.
There is a tool included that shows s
Which can be a good thing, as it allows a house or business to actually
download system updates from a device on the LAN that already has them,
potentially saving large amounts of bandwidth
On Dec 3, 2015 9:15 AM, "Stefan Englhardt" wrote:
> They have done a lot of optimizations.
>
>
>
> There is
They have done a lot of optimizations.
There is a tool included that shows starttimes of services at systemstart
and offer to disable automatic start.
Win 8/10 use less memory than Win7.
So it is an improvement for sure.
Dont forget to disable the Windows Update Peer Networking. If not
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
