Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

Yep, I know. Could be anything. This signal is very hot though. We've seen baby monitors and cordless phones go bad and start spewing all kinds of crap over the years. And remember, Canopy 900 FSK is listening on an 8MHz wide channel. That's why it looks so bad. And like I said, it's

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

I was asking because most good SA like his can demod AM and FM signals...I can recognize signatures of SCADA radios and other stuff by listening... but check FCC link I sent for ideasI love tracking down stuff... On Jun 13, 2016 9:30 PM, "George Skorup" wrote: > Downtown

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

Amtrak runs through. They have an 80 foot tower down the street. It's not coming from that though. On 6/13/2016 10:22 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: 911.5 is used by some railroad companies for Transponders... On Jun 13, 2016 9:18 PM, "Jaime Solorza"

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

Downtown area of a small-ish city/town.. place. 5-10k pop. like most larger towns around here. Yeah, I thought about listening to the signal, but I don't have a scanner or really anything else that can tune it. There's no variation, just constant. It's very easy to see Canopy's FSK modulation

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

Yikes... https://fccid.io/frequency-explorer.php?lower=911.5=913.5 On Jun 13, 2016 9:22 PM, "Jaime Solorza" wrote: > 911.5 is used by some railroad companies for Transponders... > On Jun 13, 2016 9:18 PM, "Jaime Solorza" > wrote: > >> On

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

911.5 is used by some railroad companies for Transponders... On Jun 13, 2016 9:18 PM, "Jaime Solorza" wrote: > On your graph it is much wider than what you are statinghow was the > aniritsu set up? Did you try listening to signal? You can find allot of > issues

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

Had a friend at the dispatch company stop by and let us use an Anritsu. It's a very high power signal at 911.5. And it's very narrow, either 1 or 10khz. Maybe 5. I'm tired. On the street with a little 10dBi M2 yagi, we couldn't add enough attenuation to get it to stop overloading even the

Re: [AFMUG] Trango StrataPro Xi

Yeah, sure, if your design goal is to make your L3 backbone harder to troubleshoot and more failure prone in chains of non-redundant devices. I suppose I could put a 48 port 1000BaseT switch in front of each router and put the microwave PTP linked OSPF /30 BB interfaces each on their own vlan,

Re: [AFMUG] Trango StrataPro Xi

A thing that is barely more capable than a Cisco 3750G (which can do static L3 routes or iBGP) is NOT a real router. It's a switch. Show me any serious routing platform from Cisco, Juniper, alcatel-lucent, huawei or ZTE that does 2.5G SFP. On Jun 13, 2016 6:44 PM, "Cassidy B. Larson"

Re: [AFMUG] Trango StrataPro Xi

The NetVana 1544 is also a L3 Switch and does OSPF/BGP too! Heh. > On Jun 13, 2016, at 7:26 PM, Josh Baird wrote: > > There -could- be a router doing L3 behind the switch. It's not that > uncommon, right? > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Eric Kuhnke

Re: [AFMUG] Trango StrataPro Xi

There -could- be a router doing L3 behind the switch. It's not that uncommon, right? On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > Switch? If people do layer 2 over $6,000+ microwave for backbone links > between two POPs, that is a really bad idea in my opinion.

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

Typo... should have said 3600 watt-hours for 4 batteries. bp On 6/13/2016 5:40 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote: Gotcha. That makes perfect sense. *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince *Sent:* Monday, June 13, 2016 5:56 PM *To:*

Re: [AFMUG] higher gain 3.65 dual pol dish than UBNT

I thought Jirous had one (I remember it as pricey), but I can’t find it now. I thought it was a high performance deep parabolic type. From: George Skorup Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 4:16 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] higher gain 3.65 dual pol dish than UBNT We've used some Laird

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

Yes, but I’m lazy and don’t want to compute or try to dig up their spreadsheet on their broken web site. So I guess I’ll leave it at 1.1 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 6:37 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number My

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

Gotcha. That makes perfect sense. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 5:56 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number The rest of the story is about power. In this case, the best way to think of it is in watt-hours. One

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

My Alpha manual has a section showing in detail now to determine Peukert number and Peukert capacity from the battery manufacturer’s spec sheet. One of my criteria for selecting batteries is “does the manufacturer have a spec sheet”. From: Sterling Jacobson Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 5:23

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

I imagine it could be stronger than that.  Looks like the scale stops at -35 Sean Heskett wrote: whatever it is, it has to be right on the same site as you or aimed right at you since it's at a -35 :-/ On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:56 PM,

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

The rest of the story is about power. In this case, the best way to think of it is in watt-hours. One 75ah, 12v battery is 900 watt-hours. Two 75ah, 12v batteries is 1800 watt-hours Three 75ah, 12v batteries is 2700 watt-hours Four 75ah, 12v batteries is 3600 watt-hours Now if you connect

Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

602...end of transmission On Jun 13, 2016 2:56 PM, "Stefan Englhardt" wrote: > Watching Italian vs Belgium. Great match. > > Ursprüngliche Nachricht > Von: Josh Reynolds > Datum: 13.06.2016 21:49 (GMT+01:00) > An: af@afmug.com >

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

whatever it is, it has to be right on the same site as you or aimed right at you since it's at a -35 :-/ On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:56 PM, George Skorup wrote: > Thanks. Not sure why I didn't find that. > > Not sure what this is, but it sucks. We were on 912 and someone

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

4 batteries Yes, 75Ah @ 48v vs 300Ah @ 12vor for apples and apples comparison use watt hours... On 06/13/2016 03:39 PM, George Skorup wrote: Yes On 6/13/2016 5:37 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote: I think if you wire in series you add the voltage, so it’s 48v right? But the AH stays the

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

That would be the issue! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:37 PM, George Skorup wrote: > Uh. I think you have series and parallel backwards. > > On 6/13/2016 5:31 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

Probably something like 44 volts. 42 volts and you're at 100% DOD. On 6/13/2016 5:38 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote: And if I’m using AGM sealed batteries what voltage in this configuration should I tell the UPS to shut off? *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Sterling

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

Yes On 6/13/2016 5:37 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote: I think if you wire in series you add the voltage, so it’s 48v right? But the AH stays the same so I would still have 75Ah? *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman *Sent:* Monday, June 13, 2016 4:31 PM *To:*

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

Uh. I think you have series and parallel backwards. On 6/13/2016 5:31 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: If you wire 4 batteries in series that's 12v =) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:27 PM, George Skorup

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

And if I’m using AGM sealed batteries what voltage in this configuration should I tell the UPS to shut off? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 4:37 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number I think if you wire in

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

I think if you wire in series you add the voltage, so it’s 48v right? But the AH stays the same so I would still have 75Ah? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 4:31 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number If you wire 4

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

If you wire 4 batteries in Parallel that is the same voltage.. On 06/13/2016 03:31 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: If you wire 4 batteries in series that's 12v =) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:27 PM, George

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

If you wire 4 batteries in series that's 12v =) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:27 PM, George Skorup wrote: > Does not compute. If he's running four 75ah batteries in series to get a >

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

^ On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:27 PM, George Skorup wrote: > Does not compute. If he's running four 75ah batteries in series to get a > 48VDC battery, then he gets 75Ah. > > On 6/13/2016 5:24 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Oh you're complicating the question...I think. > > The

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

Does not compute. If he's running four 75ah batteries in series to get a 48VDC battery, then he gets 75Ah. On 6/13/2016 5:24 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Oh you're complicating the question...I think. The capacity from one 75ah is simply quadrupled in your case. You have 300ah. When you add

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

Oh you're complicating the question...I think. The capacity from one 75ah is simply quadrupled in your case. You have 300ah. When you add another (identical) battery you're adding capacity/runtime linearly. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy,

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

Yeah, the Alpha will calculate this, but I need to know how to calculate Peukerts Number. Or if I’m just running a simple series of four 12v for 48 volts is 1.1 just the default I should use? Do I add up all the four 75ah ratings per battery and use that as the rated battery capacity number

Re: [AFMUG] Peukert Number

Peukert's formula, T = C / In (or C = T * In), where C is theoretical capacity (in amp-hours, equal to actual capacity at one amp), I is current (in amps), T is time (in hours), and n is the Peukert number for the battery. http://www.csgnetwork.com/batterylifecalc.html This? Josh Luthman

[AFMUG] Peukert Number

Been reviewing my site capacity/UPS/Batteries. Our Alpha's have a Peukert Number to help identify and tweak capacity in remaining amp hours. Can someone give me the short of this calculation? That is, if I have four 12v batteries run in series that are 75AH each?

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

We're going to be dual stack. A lot of broken stuff / sites in v6 land, and no AWS :[ On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > Commencing new project: > Going to attempt to provision all new customers on V6 only. > This is gonna hurt.

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

We are also doing this with a new site we just deployed. It has a full cluster of 5Ghz,3.65 and 900 Access points. Talk about a Giga Tower LOL On 06/13/2016 11:36 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: V6 and carry on. V4 can all go to district 9. *From:* Ken Hohhof *Sent:* Monday,

Re: [AFMUG] higher gain 3.65 dual pol dish than UBNT

We've used some Laird HDDA3W-25-DP dishes with connectorized 3GHz 450 SMs. The feedhorn can be rotated for V/H or -/+45. They do make a 29dBi 3 foot version. On 6/13/2016 4:05 PM, Paul McCall wrote: Is there an antenna with slightly higher gain than can be used with AirFiber 3x? UBNT is

Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA Members] Looking for 24V PS + Battery

? What am I missing. We are already doing this now. Just want to get away from it with some kind of all in one device. Tyson Burris, President Internet Communications Inc. 739 Commerce Dr. Franklin, IN 46131 317-738-0320 Daytime # 317-412-1540 Cell/Direct # Online: www.surfici.net

[AFMUG] higher gain 3.65 dual pol dish than UBNT

Is there an antenna with slightly higher gain than can be used with AirFiber 3x? UBNT is 26db Paul Paul McCall, President PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc. 658 Old Dixie Highway Vero Beach, FL 32962 772-564-6800 pa...@pdmnet.net

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

Man that sucks. Makes you want to find the offending device and perform some high velocity percussive maintenance on it! -Ty -Ty On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:56 PM, George Skorup wrote: > Thanks. Not sure why I didn't find that. > > Not sure what this is, but it sucks. We

Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

Watching Italian vs Belgium. Great match. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Josh Reynolds Datum: 13.06.2016 21:49 (GMT+01:00) An: af@afmug.com Betreff: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

Thanks. Not sure why I didn't find that. Not sure what this is, but it sucks. We were on 912 and someone decided to get right on top of us. Now we're at 923 and I can keep only one customer registered (because he's at -45). Looks like we're going to have to abandon 900 at this site. On

[AFMUG] Looking for 24V PS + Battery

What is the latest and greatest everyone is using? Want to push 24V or 48V up tower + have integrated battery backup. Right now everything is separated and independent of each other. Takes up too much space. Those days are over. I want something simple, compact and not to concerned about

Re: [AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

I believe that this will answer your question: https://community.ubnt.com/t5/Wireless-Networking/Ubiquiti-900-Mhz-frequencies/td-p/454763 On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:56 PM, George Skorup wrote: > Anybody know offhand what the carrier frequencies are for the UBNT M900 at > the

Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

NO_CARRIER On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Robert Andrews wrote: > A Host is a Host from Coast to Coast unless it is busy, hung, or dead... > > On 06/13/2016 01:07 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: >> >> 404 host not found >> >> >> >> -Ty >> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:55 PM,

Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

A Host is a Host from Coast to Coast unless it is busy, hung, or dead... On 06/13/2016 01:07 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: 404 host not found -Ty On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Josh Reynolds > wrote: *** sits here confused *** ***

Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

Ha! Reminds me of all the customers that think I can see their computer from here. -Ty On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Andrew Haninger wrote: > can you guys see what I type? > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Josh Reynolds > wrote: > > *** sits

Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

can you guys see what I type? On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > *** sits here confused *** > > > *** frantically scribbles note on paper *** > > *** mails note to Ty *** > > > > > > > > > > *** waits for response *** > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at

Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

404 host not found -Ty On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > *** sits here confused *** > > > *** frantically scribbles note on paper *** > > *** mails note to Ty *** > > > > > > > > > > *** waits for response *** > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:50

[AFMUG] UBNT 900 channels

Anybody know offhand what the carrier frequencies are for the UBNT M900 at the various channel widths. Is 911 one of them?

Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

*** sits here confused *** *** frantically scribbles note on paper *** *** mails note to Ty *** *** waits for response *** On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: > just nod if you can hear me... > > > > -Ty > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:49

Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

BRB listening to entire Pink Floyd discography. See ya’ll next week. Chris Wright Network Administrator Velociter Wireless 209-838-1221 x115 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 12:50 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap,

Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

Immunizations, gun control, religion, Trump and Hillary are having a baby, I hate tomatos From: Ty Featherling Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 1:50 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on? just nod if you can hear me... -Ty On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:49

Re: [AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

just nod if you can hear me... -Ty On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > > > > > > ELOooo > > > > > *** is anybody out there *** >

[AFMUG] *tap, tap, tap* Is this thing on?

ELOooo *** is anybody out there ***

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

V6 and carry on. V4 can all go to district 9. From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 10:23 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come No one ever got fired for buying IBM or Cisco, or for having an IPv4 website. Speaking of which, www.ibm.com doesn’t seem to have

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

No one ever got fired for buying IBM or Cisco, or for having an IPv4 website. Speaking of which, www.ibm.com doesn’t seem to have any records. Nor does www.godaddy.com. Perhaps an IPv4 only site keeps out the riff-raff. From: Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 11:15 AM To:

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

We are making the push to dual stack it’s exciting John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave,

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

Hmmm, would think Godaddy would have taken care of that for me. From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 10:08 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come IPv4 only. Like www.mccowntech.com? From: Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 11:01 AM To: af@afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

We have a couple of options. The cisco consultant prefers one of them and I am not well versed enough to know which. From: Cassidy B. Larson Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 10:07 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come What’re you using for DNS64/NAT64 or whatever else

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

IPv4 only. Like www.mccowntech.com? From: Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 11:01 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come Only when the end is V4 only. We hear stats that all US domains are already 60-80% V6. From: Joe Novak Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:56 AM

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

What’re you using for DNS64/NAT64 or whatever else you’re using to get back to v4 land? > On Jun 13, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > > Only when the end is V4 only. We hear stats that all US domains are already > 60-80% V6. > > From: Joe Novak

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

My truck has a V6. It's great. Turbo'd though. bp On 6/13/2016 8:54 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: Commencing new project: Going to attempt to provision all new customers on V6 only. This is gonna hurt.

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

Only when the end is V4 only. We hear stats that all US domains are already 60-80% V6. From: Joe Novak Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:56 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come are you going to be natting IPV6 > IPV4 at the edge? On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Chuck

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

Gonna have to do something. -Ty -Ty On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Joe Novak wrote: > are you going to be natting IPV6 > IPV4 at the edge? > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > >> Commencing new project: >> Going to attempt to

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

are you going to be natting IPV6 > IPV4 at the edge? On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > Commencing new project: > Going to attempt to provision all new customers on V6 only. > This is gonna hurt. >

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

A lot. -Ty -Ty On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > Commencing new project: > Going to attempt to provision all new customers on V6 only. > This is gonna hurt. >

Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

the "Jumping in with both feet" project? On 6/13/16 8:54 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: Commencing new project: Going to attempt to provision all new customers on V6 only. This is gonna hurt.

[AFMUG] IPV6 here we come

Commencing new project: Going to attempt to provision all new customers on V6 only. This is gonna hurt.

Re: [AFMUG] Trango StrataPro Xi

manufacturers make the weirdest decisions... On Saturday, June 11, 2016, Jon Auer wrote: > Adtran NetVanta 1544 Ethernet switches (24xGigE, 4xSFP) have been 2.5G > capable since 2009. > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Eric Kuhnke