Re: [AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount of 430SMs on Interop mode?

2015-02-19 Thread Adam Moffett
ence situation. *From:* Sam Kirsch <mailto:sam...@plexicomm.net> *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:22 AM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount of 430SMs on Interop mode? We weren't capping out the 4

Re: [AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount of 430SMs on Interop mode?

2015-02-19 Thread David
fading or interference situation. *From:* Sam Kirsch <mailto:sam...@plexicomm.net> *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:22 AM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount of 430SMs on Interop mode? We weren'

Re: [AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount of 430SMs on Interop mode?

2015-02-19 Thread Ken Hohhof
: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount of 430SMs on Interop mode? We weren't capping out the 430AP, no. It was replaced because the tower was replaced and in order to get a smooth transition and keep an eye towards the future we put a 450

Re: [AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount of 430SMs on Interop mode?

2015-02-19 Thread Sam Kirsch
plexicomm.net Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 | Fax: 1.866.852.4688 Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 | sam...@plexicomm.net -- Original Message -- From: "Mark Radabaugh" To: af@afmug.com Sent: 2/18/2015 4:15:22 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount

Re: [AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount of 430SMs on Interop mode?

2015-02-18 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
Make sure everything is on firmware 13.2 i have seen strange results mixing 430/450 radios on the earlier firmware Sent from my iPhone Kurt Fankhauser Wavelinc Communications P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 http://www.wavelinc.com tel. 419-562-6405 fax. 419-617-0110 > On Feb 18, 2015, at 4:29 PM

Re: [AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount of 430SMs on Interop mode?

2015-02-18 Thread That One Guy
doesnt the spreadsheet let you put in 430 SMs? On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote: > We have done this multiple times. I would expect to see performance > basically double for any customer you switch from a 430SM to a 450SM. > Overall throughput of the AP should increase pret

Re: [AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount of 430SMs on Interop mode?

2015-02-18 Thread Mark Radabaugh
We have done this multiple times. I would expect to see performance basically double for any customer you switch from a 430SM to a 450SM. Overall throughput of the AP should increase pretty proportionally as you replace 430 SM's with 450's. If you were capping out the 430 (which seems odd if

[AFMUG] Expected throughput on 450APs handling a fair amount of 430SMs on Interop mode?

2015-02-18 Thread Sam Kirsch
I have a 450 that was very recently put up in place of a 430AP. 16/22 Customers are 430s in Interop mode, the rest are 450s. What can I expect as maximum throughput? I was sort of expecting greater or equal performance to a 430, but I've had a lot of odd feeback from customers since we switc