ge --
> From: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com <mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>>
> To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
> Sent: 12/30/2016 6:00:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mirotik help - dua
.
-- Original Message --
From: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: 12/30/2016 6:00:25 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mirotik help - dual backhauls and bridges
Hit enter too soon. If you want two parallel PTP links bet
youll need a /30 across the ospf link on each side too for ospf to
propagate, or is there a way to do ospf without ip addressing?
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> Hit enter too soon. If you want two parallel PTP links between two sites,
> sharing
Hit enter too soon. If you want two parallel PTP links between two sites,
sharing traffic equally. Assuming both radio links are identical equipment
and identical speed capability. Set the same OSPF cost on the router
interfaces both ends.
This is logically the same thing as putting two routers
You should not be extending layer 2 switch fabrics over PTP microwave.
One router at each site.
Each router gets a /32 OSPF loopback address.
One OSPF /30 per radio link.
The only MAC addresses that should exist on the radio link (which is itself
a L2 bridge) are the single MACs for the router
ECMP
On Dec 30, 2016 2:50 PM, "Ty Featherling" wrote:
> I have my network setup with a common bridge (bridgeWAN) setup on each
> router in an area. The backhaul in goes into this bridge and any backhauls
> to further sites do as well. OSPF sorts out the default path and
I have my network setup with a common bridge (bridgeWAN) setup on each
router in an area. The backhaul in goes into this bridge and any backhauls
to further sites do as well. OSPF sorts out the default path and the bridge
gets them there in one IP hop. I have a major site that I am added a second