[AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

Got the title right this time. Man...slightly over $8000 per address passed. That seems really steep. No wonder nobody wanted to do it. If they get 80% of addresses passed that is a bit over $10k per customer. What is you fiber guys experience overlaying FTTH over non FTTH delivery?

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

How about a little context? Westminster muni dark fiber

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

" To: "Animal Farm" Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R How about a little context? Westminster muni dark fiber[https://insidetowers.com/westminster-future-proofs-dark-fiber-network/?utm_source=Inside+Towers+List&utm_campaign=217214801e-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_06_20&utm_medium

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

I can do a home for about $3500 From: Lewis Bergman Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 6:24 AM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R Got the title right this time. Man...slightly over $8000 per address passed. That seems really steep. No wonder nobody wanted to do it. If they get 80% of

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

*Subject:* [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R > > Got the title right this time. Man...slightly over $8000 per address > passed. That seems really steep. No wonder nobody wanted to do it. If they > get 80% of addresses passed that is a bit over $10k per customer. > > What is you fiber guys expe

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

I am 100% Calix, one hand hole per two homes, 100% underground. From: Roger Timmerman Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 9:10 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R We are hitting about $1450 per address passed, and $1000 per home connected all-in expenses. Roger On Mon, Jun 26

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

profitably. Who knows; maybe this will work. On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:13 AM Chuck McCown wrote: > I am 100% Calix, one hand hole per two homes, 100% underground. > > *From:* Roger Timmerman > *Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 9:10 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFM

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

100% underground. >> >> *From:* Roger Timmerman >> *Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 9:10 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R >> >> We are hitting about $1450 per address passed, and $1000 per home >> connected all-in expenses. &g

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

ebook.com/ServerPlus365/> [http://i.imgur.com/ELG0AB1.png]<https://twitter.com/RealServerPlus> [Utah 100] [fast50-01] [Inc 5000] From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 10:22 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

On 6/29/17 09:34, Layne Sisk wrote: So what we are saying is the private business can do things more cost effectively than government? Government can get through permitting and planning roadblocks easier though, unless you can name drop like Google Fiber did. ~Seth

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

Not always. NEPA is NEPA. If a city wants to pass over BLM turf, same process applies. -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 10:38 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R On 6/29/17 09:34, Layne Sisk wrote: So what we are saying is the

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

t; >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:13 AM Chuck McCown wrote: >> >>> I am 100% Calix, one hand hole per two homes, 100% underground. >>> >>> *From:* Roger Timmerman >>> *Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 9:10 AM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>

Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R

ect: Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R Not always. NEPA is NEPA. If a city wants to pass over BLM turf, same process applies. -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 10:38 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R On 6/29/17 09:34, Layne Sisk wrote