Anyone else see this yet?
https://www.ksl.com/?sid=46274530
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
over again. Apparently we never outgrow this stupidity.
*From:* David mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 11:58 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
Agreed...
Thanks Comcast :)
On 02/11/2015 11:21 AM, Mike Hammett wrote
public school
all over again. Apparently we never outgrow this stupidity.
From: David
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 11:58 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
Agreed...
Thanks Comcast :)
On 02/11/2015 11:21 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
That's what got us
It's also now possible with hulu (just noticed).
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/11/2015 10:44 PM, Jeremy wrote:
This is only possible on Netflix, but will allow them 10x the movies
per month (7GB per hour vs. 0.7GB per hour).
I've sent letters to my senator and representative.
We'll see.
-Original Message-
From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 12:28 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
I just ready yet another article on the so called net neutrality the FCC
commissioners.
-Original Message- From: David
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 4:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
I hope so.. Because I can be Extreme :)
On 02/05/2015 02:46 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Steve's talk about this yesterday lead me to believe
: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
It may be legal, but why should I be required to provide someone access to a
paid service without getting anything from it? It’s like telling a retailer
that they can sell their product in the mall without having to pay any rent.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
Silver Lake
Block legal content? No.
-Original Message-
From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:52 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
I was kind of wondering another thing about this proposal. I know it will
make it so we cannot have fast and slow
, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:
Block legal content? No.
-Original Message- From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:52 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
I was kind of wondering another thing about this proposal
:
I've sent letters to my senator and representative.
We'll see.
-Original Message- From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 12:28 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
I just ready yet another article on the so called net neutrality the FCC
software upgrades, books,
music, and video.”
Customer agrees to the TOS or finds another service. Problem solved.
Jerry
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 9:22 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
That's
, February 11, 2015 12:18:47 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
Right, so punish Comcast, not WISPs.
One jackass breaks the law, so lets punish everyone. Just like public school
all over again. Apparently we never outgrow this stupidity.
From: David
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015
Right, so punish Comcast, not WISPs.
One jackass breaks the law, so lets punish everyone. Just like public school
all over again. Apparently we never outgrow this stupidity.
From: David
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 11:58 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
Agreed
Waldrop
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 12:18 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
Right, so punish Comcast, not WISPs.
One jackass breaks the law, so lets punish everyone. Just like public school
all over again. Apparently we never outgrow this stupidity.
From: David
11, 2015 9:22 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
That's what got us into the mess we're now in.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
*From: *Brett A Mansfield br...@silverlakeinternet.com
...@kwisp.com wrote:
Block legal content? No.
-Original Message- From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:52 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
I was kind of wondering another thing about this proposal. I know it will
make it so we cannot have
br...@silverlakeinternet.com
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Wednesday, February 11, 2015 11:20:07 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
It may be legal, but why should I be required to provide someone
access to a paid service without getting anything from it? It’s like
telling a retailer
Don’t worry, the dingo has promised to forbear from eating babies.
Or remember Bruce the shark in Finding Nemo? “Fish are friends, not food.”
From: Mark Radabaugh
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 1:56 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
Without getting too political
: Thursday, February 05, 2015 4:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
I hope so.. Because I can be Extreme :)
On 02/05/2015 02:46 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Steve's talk about this yesterday lead me to believe this is something we
can live
On 2/11/15 9:20, Brett A Mansfield wrote:
It may be legal, but why should I be required to provide someone access to a
paid service without getting anything from it?
The customer pays you for internet access, right? That's what you get
from it.
~Seth
The solution is easy. Usage Based Billing. Unlimited is nuts for a WISP,
unless you have the spectrum to put 8 people per Access Point...
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
On 2/11/15 9:20, Brett A Mansfield wrote:
It may be legal, but why should I be
That's not a solution if it makes you non-competitive.
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote:
The solution is easy. Usage Based Billing. Unlimited is nuts for a WISP,
unless you have the spectrum to put 8 people per Access Point...
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at
out back) once our more
important customers who pay $10 per gigabyte have eaten their fill.
From: Jason McKemie
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 11:13 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
That's not a solution if it makes you non-competitive.
On Wednesday, February 11
You may not call that UBB, but without it we'd have many, many people using
over 1TB per month. That is where our sales tactic becomes important. I
point them to our competitors hidden limits, I have the pages printed out
for local events, I educate the customers who thought that they were
Who are you competing against? We have Century Link, Comcast, and Digis as
our main competitorsall of which have a 'Abuse Policy' that has limits
hidden in it. We are just upfront about it. 300GB per month, 50 cents per
GB thereafter. Simple. Use SlingBox to your hearts content...up to
is something of equal value (our livelyhood = ?) to folks in
office to take away from them.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
The forbearance process, changeable
Steve's talk about this yesterday lead me to believe this is something we
can live with.
-Original Message-
From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 11:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
I just ready yet another article on the so called net
: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
I just ready yet another article on the so called net neutrality the
FCC will be voting on Feb 26th. This government overreach is going to
force me to have to register to collect taxes on all of my customers,
which I'll need to pay someone to do for me to make sure I stay
be
changeable at the whim of future FCC commissioners.
-Original Message-
From: David
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 4:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
I hope so.. Because I can be Extreme :)
On 02/05/2015 02:46 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Steve's talk about
My understanding is that there are loopholes for small businesses with
revenue under several million.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 10:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Net
I just ready yet another article on the so called net neutrality the FCC will
be voting on Feb 26th. This government overreach is going to force me to have
to register to collect taxes on all of my customers, which I'll need to pay
someone to do for me to make sure I stay in compliance, which
: [AFMUG] Net neutrality
My understanding is that there are loopholes for small businesses with
revenue under several million.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 10:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject
This article said that it will be regulating broadband internet providers more
heavily. When the FCC changes the definition of broadband to 25Mb and higher
will that mean that most WISPs will be exempt?
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On Feb 3, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Tyson Burris @ Internet
thats the way i am interpretting it, does that mean we dont need to file form
477 anymore too?
Sent from my iPhone
Kurt Fankhauser
Wavelinc Communications
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
http://www.wavelinc.com
tel. 419-562-6405
fax. 419-617-0110
On Feb 3, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Brett A Mansfield
I assume you’re joking.
But I’ll bet 24.9M / 2.9M with no USF taxes would be an attractive offer to
customers!
From: Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 9:09 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net Neutrality - CNN front page
thats the way i am interpretting it, does
...@kwisp.com wrote:
I assume you’re joking.
But I’ll bet 24.9M / 2.9M with no USF taxes would be an attractive offer to
customers!
From: Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 9:09 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Net Neutrality - CNN front page
thats the way i
, February 03, 2015 9:09 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Net Neutrality - CNN front page
thats the way i am interpretting it, does that mean we dont need to
file form 477 anymore too?
Sent from my iPhone
Kurt Fankhauser
Wavelinc Communications
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
http
...@wavelinc.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 03, 2015 9:09 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Net Neutrality - CNN front page
thats the way i am interpretting it, does that mean we dont need to
file form 477 anymore too?
Sent from my iPhone
Kurt Fankhauser
Wavelinc
wrote:
I assume you’re joking.
But I’ll bet 24.9M / 2.9M with no USF taxes would be an attractive offer
to customers!
*From:* Kurt Fankhauser li...@wavelinc.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 03, 2015 9:09 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Net Neutrality - CNN front page
thats
http://money.cnn.com/2015/02/02/technology/net-neutrality-fcc/index.html
Tyson Burris, President
Internet Communications Inc.
739 Commerce Dr.
Franklin, IN 46131
317-738-0320 Daytime #
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #
Online: www.surfici.net
What can ICI do for you?
Broadband
40 matches
Mail list logo
