I'm looking for the best high capacity and low cost PTMP solution. This is for
my backhauls to distribute to smaller cells in a large area. Anyone know of
something that fits this description?
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
EPMP and maybe Ubnt AC
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On May 29, 2015 5:32 PM, "Brett A Mansfield"
wrote:
> I'm looking for the best high capacity and low cost PTMP solution. This is
> for my backhauls to distribute to smaller cells
I'm looking for backhaul. Anything in 2.4 or 5GHz won't work.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
> On May 29, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> EPMP and maybe Ubnt AC
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>> On May 29,
3.65 Ubnt for backhaul maybe?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
> I'm looking for backhaul. Anything in 2.4 or 5GHz won't work.
>
> Thank you,
>
in.com/in/danielwhite84>
***
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:42 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
I'm loo
ca LLC
> Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590
> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com
> Skype: danieldwhite
> Social: LinkedIn
>
> ***
>
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
> Sent: Frid
t; Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590
>
> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com
>
> Skype: danieldwhite
> Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84>
>
>
>
> *******
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *On
> Behalf Of
(303) 746-3590
>
> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com
>
> Skype: danieldwhite
> Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84>
>
>
>
> ***
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afm
: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
You know that's why they sync, right? You can have a whole lot of sync'ed
APs/masters at the one site and as long as they're transmitting at the same
time and the client/slave sites aren't nearing the different master's you'll b
;
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 2:58 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
>
>
>
> You know that's why they sync, right? You can have
>>> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com
>>>
>>> Skype: danieldwhite
>>> Social: LinkedIn
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ***
>>>
>>>
>>>
>&
Right now your fastest option is Ubiquiti AC products.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:06 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
High capacity, comparatively inexpensive, and PTMP do all go together
; From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:06 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
>
> High capacity, comparatively inexpensive, and PTMP do all go together. I
> don't expect to spend
e like Vivato does or
> depending on how many clients and range you are talking about, maybe
> something in 24 or 80GHz.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 2:58 PM
> *To:* af@afm
I wasn’t suggesting PTMP, only that you can put up more of those radios on the
same tower if you only need 6 links for example.
rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:14 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
I&#
gt;>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
>> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 2:58 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
>>
>>
>>
>> You know that's why they sync, rig
You need a different strategy.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:18 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
You're very right about the 24GHz. I know several companies are working on
somethi
...@saftehnika.com
>>
>> Skype: danieldwhite
>> Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ***
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:18 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
>
> You're very right about the 24GHz. I know several companies are working on
> something in 60GHz wh
d use Cambridge like Vivato does or
> depending on how many clients and range you are talking about, maybe
> something in 24 or 80GHz.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 2:58 PM
>
Friday, May 29, 2015 4:14 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
I'm pretty sure the FCC doesn't allow PtMP in 24ghz. I don't know if anything
exists for PtMP in 80ghz... or maybe 60ghz?
It seems like the only real option here is 28ghz.
On Fri, May 29, 20
gt; Brett A Mansfield
>>
>>> On May 29, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>>>
>>> You need a different strategy.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.
(303) 746-3590
>
> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com
>
> Skype: danieldwhite
> Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84>
>
>
>
> ***
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...
Maybe you can explain what you would do different than all the other
manufacturers that would solve the problem.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:33 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
You don&#
gt; Daniel White - Managing Director
>> SAF North America LLC
>> Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590
>> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com
>> Skype: danieldwhite
>> Social: LinkedIn
>>
>> ***
>>
&
in.com/in/danielwhite84>
***
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 4:33 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
Aren't there antenna beamwidth requirem
gt; To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
>
> You don't need a lot of money to start manufacturing. You just need to know
> the right people.
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
> On May 29, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Jason McKemie
> w
;
>> Maybe you can explain what you would do different than all the other
>> manufacturers that would solve the problem.
>>
>> Rory
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
>> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:33 PM
>> To
than all the other
manufacturers that would solve the problem.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:33 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
You don't n
.
*From:* Brett A Mansfield <mailto:li...@silverlakeinternet.com>
*Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 4:49 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
60 and 240GHz can make wireless in urban areas actually be able to
compete with cable and mayb
a different strategy.
Rory
From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:18 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
You're very right about the 24GHz. I know several companies are working on
something in
e:
>
> Maybe you can explain what you would do different than all the other
> manufacturers that would solve the problem.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Brett A Mansfield
> *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 3:33 PM
ns
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> --
> *From: *"Brett A Mansfield"
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Friday, May 29, 2015 5:23:26 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
>
> Yep, it sure does seem that way. I'm trying to think outside of th
field
>>>
>>>> On May 29, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you can explain what you would do different than all the other
>>>> manufacturers that would solve the problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
t;
>> On May 29, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>>
>> Maybe you can explain what you would do different than all the other
>> manufacturers that would solve the problem.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...
Yeah, but it will require the faith of a mustard seed. Physics is notoriously
difficult to to bend to your will.
From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 5:58 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
I've heard this argument before. I respond the sam
e due to the difference in the AP antenna and an
> PTP antenna.
>
> Doug Clark was all over some 24 GHz PTMP product several years ago. I
> guess it never worked out.
>
> *From:* Brett A Mansfield
>
> *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 4:49 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subj
A Mansfield
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 5:58 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
>
> I've heard this argument before. I respond the same way every time. Where
> there is a will, there is a way. We just haven't found it yet.
>
>
When you get around the fact that the earth is a conductor, let me know.
From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 6:22 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
I really believe that there is more that can be done than we currently know.
You may call that faith
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
I really believe that there is more that can be done than we currently know.
You may call that faith of a mustard seed, but it's been proven time and again
in history. We may think we know the laws of physics, but who's to say that we
a
some great
> ideas coming out that are based on the foundation of experience, innovation,
> and again realistic engineering, I kind of think you are not being realistic.
>
> Rory
>
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 5:
out that are based on
the foundation of experience, innovation, and again realistic engineering, I
kind of think you are not being realistic.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 5:22 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subjec
the
world use of 60GHz for instance.
Daniel White
(303) 746-3590
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 7:31 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
Wow, out of all of that, you focused on the profit part.
iday, May 29, 2015 5:32:37 PM
> Subject: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
>
> I'm looking for the best high capacity and low cost PTMP solution. This is
> for my backhauls to distribute to smaller cells in a large area. Anyone know
> of something that fits this description?
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
net & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Brett A Mansfield"
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Sent:
45 matches
Mail list logo
