11:18 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
Paul,
Thanks for the response. More specifically I’m interested in the SM side
of the test, as we too are using the Cambium Antennas at the AP. However,
at the SM side, I’d recommend a NLOS test using
: Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:18 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
Paul,
Thanks for the response. More specifically I’m interested in the SM side of
the test, as we too are using the Cambium Antennas at the AP. However, at the
SM side, I’d recommend a NLOS test
450 out performs the
320.
Thank you,
Ben Royer, Operations Manager
Royell Communications, Inc.
217-965-3699 www.royell.net
From: Paul McCall
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 8:30 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
Ben,
The testing was based on using
, but under what rule set, for how long before you have to comply with
the new rules coming out?
*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 03, 2015 9:51 PM
*To:* af
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
You can still add new 3.65 AP
OK, but under what rule set, for how long before you have to comply with the
new rules coming out?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 9:51 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
You can still add new 3.65 AP
11:18 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
Paul,
Thanks for the response. More specifically I’m interested in the SM
side of the test, as we too are using the Cambium Antennas at the AP.
However, at the SM side, I’d recommend a NLOS test using a
connectorized
Communications, Inc.
217-965-3699 www.royell.net
From: Paul McCall
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 4:40 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
But, if you are using 320 for NLOS solutions, the 450 trade up means you’re
going to lose customers since the 450 doesn’t do
-3699 www.royell.net
*From:* Paul McCall mailto:pa...@pdmnet.net
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 03, 2015 4:40 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
But, if you are using 320 for NLOS solutions, the 450 trade up means
you’re going to lose customers since
Ben,
The testing was based on using the standard Cambium antenna, respectively, for
both platforms.
Paul
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ben Royer
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:11 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
What antenna are you
AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
What antenna are you using in your testing of the 450 vs. 320 NLOS?
I’m just curious because this is an interesting report, as we have a
network of around 2,500 320 customers, and we are in the same position
of looking
, 2015 9:11 AM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
What antenna are you using in your testing of the 450 vs. 320 NLOS? I’m just
curious because this is an interesting report, as we have a network of around
2,500 320 customers, and we are in the same
McCall
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:42 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
With or without…. Made like difference. Sometimes the reflector made no
different and on occasion made it worse depending on the densities of the trees.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
Im stuck with it. We bought an overstock load of APs and SMs. We have a
dream of Telrad working out to save the day with their firmware load. Some
creative Telrad AP deployments gradually replacing the 320 APs, utilizing
the 320 CPEs until we migrate the site to LTE with telrad CPEs, giving us
320
...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 5:09 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
Im stuck with it. We bought an overstock load of APs and SMs. We have a dream
of Telrad working out to save the day with their firmware load. Some creative
Don’t they have another WiMAX-to-450 tradeup going on? Kind of a 3650 MHz
cash-for-clunkers program.
From: That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 4:08 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
Im stuck with it. We bought an overstock load of APs and SMs
/sarcasm
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 03, 2015 5:09 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
Im stuck with it. We bought an overstock load of APs and SMs. We have
a dream of Telrad working out to save the day with their firmware
load. Some creative Telrad AP deployments
to wait until the “next” thing comes to play with
the FCC rules?*
*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com af-boun...@afmug.com] *On
Behalf Of *That One Guy /sarcasm
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 03, 2015 5:09 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
Im stuck
At my old job they were keeping them for as long as possible - way too much
invested in that platform to walk away . 450's on new sites as they were
being built .
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 4:26 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject:
I don't buy the LTE NLOS pitch. It's too goddamn expensive to get good
performance (3 or 4 4x4 sectors instead of a dual omni or split 2x2
sectors) to put 30, 40 or even 50 customers on a site which is all we
have in rural areas. We'll never make any money buying Telrad. I can put
up 4 sectors
We still use it. Tons of it. However, we are not doing any new builds or
installing any new customers. Purely maintenance mode at this point. Hoping
something better comes along that we can migrate to.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:08 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote:
Im
: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
Don’t they have another WiMAX-to-450 tradeup going on? Kind of a 3650 MHz
cash-for-clunkers program.
From: That One Guy /sarcasmmailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 4:08 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 320
, June 03, 2015 5:09 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 320 series - still using
Im stuck with it. We bought an overstock load of APs and SMs. We have a
dream of Telrad working out to save the day with their firmware load. Some
creative Telrad AP deployments gradually replacing
Replacing UBNT with what? 450?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2015, at 8:08 PM, George Skorup geo...@cbcast.com wrote:
I don't buy the LTE NLOS pitch. It's too goddamn expensive to get good
performance (3 or 4 4x4 sectors instead of a dual omni or split 2x2 sectors)
to put 30, 40 or even
Yes
On 6/3/2015 8:16 PM, Jon Langeler wrote:
Replacing UBNT with what? 450?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2015, at 8:08 PM, George Skorup geo...@cbcast.com
mailto:geo...@cbcast.com wrote:
I don't buy the LTE NLOS pitch. It's too goddamn expensive to get
good performance (3 or 4 4x4
24 matches
Mail list logo
