RE: [agi] Symbols in search of meaning - what is the meaning of B31-58-DFT?

2003-02-27 Thread Philip Sutton
Ben, > One question is whether it's enough to create general > pattern-recognition functionality, and let it deal with "seeking > meaning for symbols" as a subcase of its general behavior.   Or does > one need to create special heuristics/algorithms/structures just for > guiding this parti

RE: [agi] seed AI vs Cyc, where does Novamente fall?

2003-02-27 Thread Ben Goertzel
> > We need one of the technologies to evolve to the point where it delivers > > decent spatial AND temporal resolution... > > > That's exactly what I meant actually: combined FMRI and MEG > within the same experiment. You get data from each > simultaneously and combine them afterwards, using th

Re: [agi] seed AI vs Cyc, where does Novamente fall?

2003-02-27 Thread Brad Wyble
> > > > As you can imagine it's very weak spatially, but far more precise > > temporally than PET or FMRI, which can only measure blood flow > > changes occuring 1 second or more after the source activity. > > > > I think combined MEG/FMRI(or was it PET/FMRI) is going to be able > > to get the be

RE: [agi] seed AI vs Cyc, where does Novamente fall?

2003-02-27 Thread Ben Goertzel
> As you can imagine it's very weak spatially, but far more precise > temporally than PET or FMRI, which can only measure blood flow > changes occuring 1 second or more after the source activity. > > I think combined MEG/FMRI(or was it PET/FMRI) is going to be able > to get the best of both worlds

Re: [agi] seed AI vs Cyc, where does Novamente fall?

2003-02-27 Thread Brad Wyble
> > I actually have a big MEG datafile on my hard drive, which I haven't gotten > around to playing with. > > It consists of about 120 time series, each with about 100,000 points in it. > > It represents the magnetic field of someone's brain, measured through 120 > sensors on their skull, while

RE: [agi] seed AI vs Cyc, where does Novamente fall?

2003-02-27 Thread Ben Goertzel
Hi, > Just FYI, MEG's (Magnetoencephalography) is a good step in > providing temporal precision, but is still a long way from > discerning individual neurons. It can basically give us EEG > measurements from deep inside the brain without using > electrodes(which obviously opens alot of doors fo

Re: [agi] seed AI vs Cyc, where does Novamente fall?

2003-02-27 Thread Brad Wyble
> > That was exactly my impression when I last looked seriously into > neuroscience (1995-96). I wanted to understand cognitive dynamics, and I > hoped that tech like PET and fMRI would do the trick. But nothing existing > giving the combination of temporal and spatial acuity that you'd need to

RE: [agi] seed AI vs Cyc, where does Novamente fall?

2003-02-27 Thread Ben Goertzel
> Yes, getting this data is what the entire field of neurophys is > about. Being able to extract it without using surgery, > electrodes, amplifiers, and gajillions of manhours would be > outstanding. A lack of data is the primary thing holding > neuroscience back and to a large degree, the depth

Re: [agi] seed AI vs Cyc, where does Novamente fall?

2003-02-27 Thread Brad Wyble
> > Indeed, making the declarative knowledge derived from "rattling off > parameters describing procedures" useful is a HARD problem... but at least > Novamente can get the data, which as you have greed, would seem to give AI > systems an in-principle advantage over humans in this area... > > It

RE: [agi] seed AI vs Cyc, where does Novamente fall?

2003-02-27 Thread Ben Goertzel
Hi, > I disagree that we have a problem converting procedural to > declarative for all domains. Sure, you're right. Here as in many other areas, the human brain's performance is highly domain-variant. > That said, Novamente would be far better at it than we. With the > ability to understand i

Re: [agi] seed AI vs Cyc, where does Novamente fall?

2003-02-27 Thread Brad Wyble
> > Yep. Novamente contains particular mechanisms for converting between > declarative and procedural knowledge... something that is learned > procedurally can become declarative and vice versa. In fact, if all goes > according to plan (a big if of course ;) Novamente should *eventually* be > mu

Re: [agi] Symbols in search of meaning

2003-02-27 Thread RSbriggs
In a message dated 2/27/2003 7:04:37 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In theory they could be encoded, but this would be a lot harder than formally encoding, say, English syntax, which has not yet been done with full success. I'll say.  It's difficult enough to be able repres

Re: [agi] Symbols in search of meaning

2003-02-27 Thread RSbriggs
In a message dated 2/26/2003 9:47:58 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Human children will learn that certain sound patterns are associated with patterned human behaviour.  So very soon (plus or minus one year) children will start to accumulate awareness of words that they kn

RE: [agi] Symbols in search of meaning

2003-02-27 Thread Ben Goertzel
Hi, Philip wrote: > But whichever way it goes it seems to me that it would be a useful thing > to equip baby AGIs with the urge and capacity to seek meaning for > symbols/simple for apparently important behaviours/environmental > patterns. Yes, I think this is a useful and important thing, indee