--- John G. Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: BillK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This article might be useful.
http://www.machineslikeus.com/cms/a-collection-of-definitions-of-
intelligence.html
A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence
Sat, 06/30/2007
By Shane Legg and
1).. 2.. 3)..
It would be nice to have a place where such work could be listed.
Right. I would keep it as a separate list.
Its items could be:
1) [later] referenced from the AGI project list (possibly from
sections 4,5,7,8,9,..).
2) nominated/suggested by authors (or automatically by the system
From: Matt Mahoney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think all of these boil down to a simple equation with just a few
variables. Anyone have it? It'd be nice if it included some sort of
computational complexity energy expression in it.
Yes. Intelligence is the expected reward in an
A large number of individuals on this list are architecting an AGI solution
(or part of one) in their spare time. I think that most of those efforts do
not have meaningful answers to many of the questions, but rather intend to
address AGI questions from a particular perspective. Would such
--- John G. Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Matt Mahoney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think all of these boil down to a simple equation with just a few
variables. Anyone have it? It'd be nice if it included some sort of
computational complexity energy expression in it.
Yes.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 08:38:40AM -0700, Derek Zahn wrote:
A large number of individuals on this list are architecting an AGI
solution (or part of one) in their spare time. I think that most of
those efforts do not have meaningful answers to many of the questions,
but rather intend to
On Nov 7, 2007 8:46 AM, Edward W. Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is much easier to think how superhuman intelligences will outshine us
in the performance arena, since all one has to do is take known human
mental talents and extrapolate. It
seems to me it is more difficult to
understand
Linas,
revealing thier weaknesses and strengths to the competition.
Putting together functional AGI is a very difficult task. So far
(more/less) failure after failure. Many critically important things
are hidden in detailed design = sharing high level info isn't in
most cases as risky (from
On 11/8/07, Linas Vepstas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And the serious contenders are a handful of small companies that
seem unlikely to fill out a self-assesment status report card
revealing thier weaknesses and strengths to the competition.
If you don't find some like-minded partners, you may not
Monika,
It seems to me that all the examples you gave of new things are ones that
could be handled with substantially more powerful versions of the type of
thinking humans already have and which machines like Novamente should be
able to deliver.
Ed Portrer
-Original Message-
From:
10 matches
Mail list logo
