On Dec 28, 2007 4:17 AM, Ed Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard,
You are entitled to your reservations about OpenCog, but others, like me,
are entitled to our enthusiasms about it.
You are correct that OpenCog starts with a certain approach, but I think it
is an approach that has a lot
OpenCog is definitely a positive thing to happen in the AGI scene. It's
been all vaporware so far.
I wonder what would be the level of participation?
Also I think it's going to increase the chance of a safe takeoff, by
exposing users and developers gradually to AGI. But we also need to have
But the traditional gods didn't represent the unknowns, but rather the
knowns. A sun god rose every day and set every night in a regular
pattern. Other things which also happened in this same regular pattern
were adjunct characteristics of the sun go. Or look at some of their
names,
On Dec 28, 2007 12:45 AM, YKY (Yan King Yin)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why I want to build an interface that lets users provide grammatical
information and the likes. The exact form of the GUI is still unknown --
maybe like a panel with a lot of templates to choose from, or like the
Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
I wish you much luck with your own approach And, I would imagine
that if you create a software framework supporting your own approach
in a convenient way, my own currently favored AI approaches will not
be conveniently explorable within it. That's the nature of
On Dec 28, 2007 5:59 AM, YKY (Yan King Yin)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenCog is definitely a positive thing to happen in the AGI scene. It's
been all vaporware so far.
Yes, it's all vaporware so far ;-)
On the other hand, the code we hope to release as part of OpenCog actually
exists, but
On Dec 10, 2007 6:59 AM, John G. Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dawkins trivializes religion from his comfortable first world
perspective
ignoring the way of life of hundreds of millions of people and offers
little
substitute for what religion does and has done for civilization and
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, that would be a serious miusunderstanding of the framework and
development environment that I am building. Your system would be just
as easy to build as any other.
... considering the proliferation of AGI
IMHO more important than working towards contributing clean code would be to
*publish the (required) interfaces for the modules as well as give standards
for/details on the knowledge representation format*. I am sure that you have
those spread over various internal and published documents
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
I wish you much luck with your own approach And, I would imagine
that if you create a software framework supporting your own approach
in a convenient way, my own currently favored AI
http://gbbopen.org/
- Message d'origine
De : Benjamin Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : agi@v2.listbox.com
Envoyé le : Vendredi, 28 Décembre 2007, 15h14mn 10s
Objet : Re: [agi] OpenCog
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
I wish
From: Samantha Atkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indeed. Some form of instaneous information transfer would be
required for unlimited growth. If it also turned out that true time
travel was possible then things would get really spooky. Alpha and
Omega. Mind without end.
I think that
Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
I wish you much luck with your own approach And, I would imagine
that if you create a software framework supporting your own approach
in a convenient way, my own
Mike Dougherty wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, that would be a serious miusunderstanding of the framework and
development environment that I am building. Your system would be just
as easy to build as any other.
... considering the
On Dec 28, 2007 1:55 PM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Dougherty wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, that would be a serious miusunderstanding of the framework and
development environment that I am building. Your system
On Dec 28, 2007, at 5:34 AM, John G. Rose wrote:
Well I shouldn't berate the poor dude... The subject of rationality is
pertinent though as the way that humans deal with unknown involves
irrationality especially in relation to deitical belief establishment.
Before we had all the scientific
16 matches
Mail list logo
