i have higher hopes for the project than richard, failing to see the
circular causality alluded to... first, human intellect is quickly
overwhelmed when trying to build logic structures with complex relationships
or even many simple relationships strung together (we max at four or five
recursions i
mponent
> which
> allows it to select among possible future sensory histories in a way that
> is
> not a part of the standard formulation of compression. This leads to
> techniques such as experimental science -- the source of 99% of current
> human
> knowledge.
>
> Josh
>
&
re is a huge overlap in the techniques used in
> > > compression
> > > and those in intelligence. However, the significant difference is that
> > > intelligence, in interacting with the real world, has a motor component
> > > which
> > > allows it to select am
function "motoring" for
> hypothesized compressibility is intelligence?
>
> I don't really have any argument with this, except possibly quibbles about
> the
> nuances of the difference between "empirical" and "empiricism" -- and I
> don't
>
Jim, We will eventually stumble upon this conceptual complexity, namely a
few algorithms that exceed the results that human intelligence uses (the
algorithms created through slow evolution and relatively fast learning). we
would have a smarter machine that exhibits advanced intelligence in many
wa
we invariably generate and then fruitlessly explore (our field is even more
exposed to this than most others) until we come up against the limits of our
own language, and defeated and fatigued realize we never thought the
questions through. i nominate this guy:
http://hyperlogic.blogspot.com/
at a
, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Tudor Boloni wrote:
>
>> we invariably generate and then fruitlessly explore (our field is even
>> more exposed to this than most others) until we come up against the limits
>> of our own language, and defeated and fatigue
I agree that there are many better questions to elucidate the
tricks/pitfalls of language. but lets list the biggest time wasters first,
and the post showed some real time wasters from various fields that i found
valuable to be aware of
> It implies it is pointless to ask what the essence of time
led by W & M as a non-concept!
>
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>
>>Tudor Boloni wrote:
>>
>>we invariably generate and th
your list is a start to a list of only potentially problematic questions or
constructs, since using these words and concepts is actually going to be
required in any AGI system... a flag list is a start, but a set of rules to
eliminate areas of language construction we do not need to ever worry abou
John, an impressive effort and wonderful direction, an analytical psychology
of the Good in humans is sorely lacking and the focus on human sickness has
had a monopoly for way too long and with untold negative consequences for
society at large. assuming these meanings are correct (or will be fine
11 matches
Mail list logo
