On Feb 4, 2008 7:38 PM, Bob Mottram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well if you take something like the "talking heads" experiment
> (http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/cited2/steelsthetalkingheadsexperiment.html)
> and ask what it would take to scale this up to human-like language
> abilities inev
On 04/02/2008, Joseph Gentle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't read any of Steels stuff lately, either. I'm not sure if any
> of the language he's generating is higher order, but I wouldn't be so
> quick to dismiss emergent language generation as a trick for just 5
> minute demos.
Well if you
On Feb 4, 2008 12:12 PM, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The robotics path to AI is a lot like the evolutionary path to natural
> intelligence...
>
> Create a system that learns to achieve simple sensorimotor goals in
> its environment...
> then move on to social goals... and language eve
Hi,
> I'd be interested in what you see as the path from SLAM to AGI.
>
> To me, language generation seems obvious: 1. Make a language and
> algorithms for generating stuff in that language. 2. Implement pattern
> recognition and abstraction (imo not _that_ hard if you've designed
> your language
On Feb 4, 2008 11:27 AM, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IMO language is integral to strong AI in the same way that logic is
> > integral to mathematics.
>
> The counterargument is that no one has yet made an AI virtual chimp ...
> and nearly all of the human brain is the same as that o
> IMO language is integral to strong AI in the same way that logic is
> integral to mathematics.
The counterargument is that no one has yet made an AI virtual chimp ...
and nearly all of the human brain is the same as that of a chimp ...
I think that language-centric approaches are viable, but I
I doubt that 3D object recognition is integral to 'genuine
intelligence'. Theoretically, if we had an AGI we should be able to
put it in a simulated 2D world and it would still act intelligently.
IMO language is integral to strong AI in the same way that logic is
integral to mathematics. If you th
, USA 78704
512.791.7860
- Original Message
From: Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2008 8:03:13 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] Emergent languages Org
Thanks for the references...
I found this paper
Kaplan, F., Oudeyer, P-Y., Kubin
Thanks for the references...
I found this paper
Kaplan, F., Oudeyer, P-Y., Kubinyi, E. and Miklosi, A. (2002) Robotic
clicker training, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 38(3-4), pp.
197--206.
at (near the bottom)
http://www.csl.sony.fr/~py/clickerTraining.htm
interesting in terms of highlighti
I havn't read any of Luc Steels stuff for a long time, but he has been
researching the evolution of language using robots or software agents
since the early 1990s. This is really a symbol grounding problem
where the communication in some way needs to represent things or
situations which the agent
Jeez there's always something new. Anyone know about this (which seems at a
glance loosely relevant to Ben's approach) ?
http://www.emergent-languages.org/
Overview
This site provides an introduction to the research on emergent and
evolutionary languages as conducted at the Sony Computer Scie
11 matches
Mail list logo
