On Thursday 09 October 2008 12:37:13 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Office Holder Since Last R2154 Stability
> ---
> Accountor BobTHJ 11 Aug 08 29 Jul 08 T
>
> Office Report
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend, without Objection, to amend The Note Exchange as follows:
I object
> [Allowing transfer of Markers to oneself shouldn't be horribly
> abusable (as allowing transfer of Markers from oneself to others
> would be), an
I intend, without Objection, to amend The Note Exchange as follows:
{{
Remove the word "fixed" from the second paragraph.
Insert a new paragraph after the second, with the following text:
{
Any party to this contract can transfer a Marker from any entity to
eirself by announcement. Markers CANNOT
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:50, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 15:57 -0700, Charles Reiss wrote:
>> Let Z be the number of 2 crops in existence plus the number of X crops
>> in existence plus the number of WRV in existence.
>>
>> Sell ticket:
>> Cost: AUCTION
>> Action:
>>
I join the Note Exchange.
I create a D Credit, a D Marker, a G# Credit, and a G# Marker.
I deposit 1 D Credit and 1 G# Credit for 100 chits.
I join the Vote Market if I am not already a party to it. (I thought I
was, but the Notary's report seems to disagree.)
I withdraw 3 VP for 268 chits.
I p
I CFJ on the statement "Nomic 217 is a nomic." Arguments: The only
thing that could make Nomic 217 a nomic is RFC 2, which both its
current players have agreed to, making it effectively a rule. Its text
is as follows:
"When interpreting and applying the rules, the general intent of the
rules takes
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let Z be the number of 2 crops in existence plus the number of X crops
> in existence plus the number of WRV in existence.
>
> Sell ticket:
> Cost: AUCTION
> Action:
> In a timely fashion after water rights are enforced in
I submit the following conditional votes and pledge not to retract them:
> 5746 O 1 1.0 Murphy The Notary web site is there to be used
LLAMA (FOR)
> 5747 O 1 1.0 Bayes Ordinary for a of
> f
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:58 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I object. If you want to leave in a huff, do it the proper way (R1789).
>
> Although, I suppose it's presently broken...
>
> Proposal: Fix Rule 1789 (AI=2)
> {
> ehird is a coauthor of this proposal.
>
> Change the power of Rule
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ehird wrote:
>>
>>> I agree to the following:
>>> {{{
>>>
>>> This is a public contract named "Russian Roulette".
>>>
>>> Any person can join this contrac
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 18:21, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5772 D 1 2.0 Murphy Loose ordering of ID numbers
>> LLAMA (PRESENT)
>
> The above vote is invalid per the Llama party agreement.
Oops. With the c
On Thursday 09 October 2008 11:02:25 pm I wrote:
> I intend, without 3 Objections, to set each of the following
> exchange rates:
As several cogent arguments have been raised against this, I also
object.
I intend, without 3 Objections, to set each of the following exchange
rates:
0 crops
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 10 October 2008 03:16:38 pm comex wrote:
>> Parties to Russian Roulette SHALL NOT reveal the password to the
>> zip file this text file is contained in, publicly or privately in
>> any forum or other method of commun
comex wrote:
> Parties to Russian Roulette CANNOT leave Russian Roulette.
>
> Parties to Russian Roulette SHALL NOT reveal the password to the zip file this
> text file is contained in, publicly or privately in any forum or other method
> of
> communication (the password in question is "").
>
>
On 10 Oct 2008, at 21:16, comex wrote:
snip
I initiate an equity case regarding Russian Roulette, parties: me,
AFO, Embassy.
It was clearly not envisioned that the text inside the zip would be
revealed.
--
ehird
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ehird wrote:
>
>> I agree to the following:
>> {{{
>>
>> This is a public contract named "Russian Roulette".
>>
>> Any person can join this contract by announcement.
>>
>> Parties to Russian Roulette are known as "Russians".
>>
On 10 Oct 2008, at 20:51, Ed Murphy wrote:
Caller's evidence:
Russian Roulette contract, relevant excerpt
All parties to this contract must act as specified by the
singular
text file in the following uuencoded password-protected zip
file:
Rule 101, relevant excerpt
I wrote:
> I initiate an inquiry case on the following statement, disqualifying
> ehird:
>
> The AFO is bound by the Russian Roulette contract.
I retract this case and initiate inquiry cases on the following
statements instead, disqualifying ehird:
If only Murphy had been given the
I initiate an inquiry case on the following statement, disqualifying
ehird:
The AFO is bound by the Russian Roulette contract.
Caller's arguments:
ehird has disclosed the password to me, but (to the best of my
knowledge) not to the AFO's other partners.
ehird wrote:
> I agree to the following:
> {{{
>
> This is a public contract named "Russian Roulette".
>
> Any person can join this contract by announcement.
>
> Parties to Russian Roulette are known as "Russians".
>
> ehird can amend Russian Roulette by announcement without 2 member
> objec
I become a party to the Fantasy Rules Contest contract.
--Wooble
On 10 Oct 2008, at 18:33, ehird wrote:
I agree to the following:
{{{
This is a public contract named "Russian Roulette".
Any person can join this contract by announcement.
Parties to Russian Roulette are known as "Russians".
ehird can amend Russian Roulette by announcement without 2 member
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal titled "Secure points":
I retract the proposal titled "Secure points".
I submit the following proposal titled "Secure points" (AI=2):
Upmutate Rule 2136 to power 2.
Upmutate Rule 2179 to power
I agree to the following:
{{{
This is a public contract named "Russian Roulette".
Any person can join this contract by announcement.
Parties to Russian Roulette are known as "Russians".
ehird can amend Russian Roulette by announcement without 2 member
objections.
All parties to this contra
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:28 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5765 O 1 1.0 Wooble
FOR * 8
> 5766 O 0 1.0 ais523 root made me do it
AGAINST * 8
> 5767 D 1 2.0 Murphy Be careful what you start
SELL (1VP)
> 5768 O 1 1.0 Murphy
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 14:52, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 06 October 2008 09:52:34 am Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I destroy 2 WRV in Pavitra's possession. I destroy Harmonic
>> Observatory, Aphrodite's Grove, Octopus's Garden, Urðarbrunnr,
>> Trinity Gardens, and Dwarf Fortress in P
TTttPF.
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 17:19 +0100, ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:28 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
> > NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> I vote as follows:
> > 5765 O 1 1.0 Wooble
> AGAINSTx3
> > 5766 O 0 1.0 ais523 root made me do it
>
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 13:05, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I harvest 2213 twice, as a CFJ and a new Rule ID, using two X crops as
> 2s, to gain a random land and 2 WRV.
>
I create a Digit Ranch (land #173) with a Seed of 5 in Wooble's possession.
SoA BobTHJ
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 08:52, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I destroy land #95 and land #106 in avpx's possession. I intend
> (without objection) to cause avpx to cease to be a farmer.
Without objection I cause avpx to cease to be a farmer.
BobTHJ
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 16:34 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> I intend without three objections to amend the AAA contract by
> replacing sections 7-10 with this text:
> {{{
> 7. Each type of Land is a class of assets. Ownership of Land is
> restricted to Farmers. The SoA is the recordkeeper of Land.
>
> 8
This message serves to make votes on behalf of the PerlNomic
Partnership (a public contract).
The PerlNomic Partnership votes as follows. Each vote is made a
number of times equal to the maximum number of valid votes that
the PerlNomic Partnership can make on an ordinary decision on each
ordinary
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The CEO of the Burgundy Corporation isn't empowered to unilaterally
> transfer assets without sockholder authorization.
Or maybe I'm wrong. I read the Authorize motion as implicitly
forbidding CEO action otherwise but t
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At a time when players of B are shifting in,
> I feel an impetus on me - perhaps imagined -
> to shift out. One way to find out.
>
> With 1.0 Agoran Consent, I intend to deregister.
I object. If you want to leave in a huff
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I object.
[...]
> Generally, I think it would be good to try avoid inflating chits by
> always raising rates, especially since some of the underlying crops
> are becoming more available and thus less valuable.
I agree. I
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> announcement, with the consent of that farmer. At the beginning of
> each week, after Digit Ranches produce crops, each Mill processes and
> removes the first available milling job with a matching Operator, if
> any, from its ow
Proposal: The cheese stands alone
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 2186 (Victory) by appending this text:
While all but one player satisfy at least one Losing Condition,
that player satisfies the Winning Condition of Solitude.
Cleanup procedure: The same person cannot satisfy this
Proposal: Referential security
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 2186 (Victory) by replacing this text:
Winning Conditions and Losing Conditions exist only as defined
by rules. Defining these things is secured.
with this text:
Winning Conditions and Losing Conditions exist only as
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 21:02, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I intend, without 3 Objections, to set each of the following exchange
> rates:
>
> 6 crops 85
> X crops 200
> (each pitch of Credits) 70
> Point Vchrs 50
>
> [It's generally A
38 matches
Mail list logo
