I bid 5 coins in each auction.
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
> I bid 3 coins in each auction
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > I bid 2 coins in each auction. -G.
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> >> There are currently more
I bid six coins in each auction
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I bid 5 coins in each auction.
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
>> I bid 3 coins in each auction
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > I bid 2 coins in each
I bid 3 coins in each auction
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I bid 2 coins in each auction. -G.
>
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
>> There are currently more public, unpreserved, non-aether land units in
>> existence than I feel like counting. 5 land units
I bid 2 coins in each auction. -G.
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> There are currently more public, unpreserved, non-aether land units in
> existence than I feel like counting. 5 land units of my choice are put up for
> auction.
>
> From this point on, I intend to prioritize land
I thought I did this, but if I didn't, or it self-ratified that I didn't:
On behalf of o, I have o transfer eir land unit to me.
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> THE MAP OF ARCADIA
>
> Previous: Jun 1,
I retract my objection, because a replacement seems fairly likely to be enacted.
-Aris
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> I oppose this, and object. I'm obviously biased, because I wrote the
> relevant system. If your problem with it is that it's over-complicated and
>
Right this is my one attempt to revitalize the institution of Contracts.
I create the following Contract (spending a coin)
Title: Contract Competition Contract
Text:
Anyone may become a Party to this Contract by announcement.
Parties to this Contract SHOULD join, create and interact with a
If you have any interesting ideas for Contracts with me that are fun,
I will do them while they still exist.
In fact I create the following Contract (spending a coin)
Title: Sillyness by contract
Text:
This Contract holds Coins.
Anyone may become a party to this Contract, VJ Rada is a party to
I retract the below proposal "Open Season II"
Go for it guys. But I'm still rubberstamping the repeal, without three
objections.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Allow them to be backing documents too and you've got a heavily simplified
> version of the current contracts
I oppose this, and object. I'm obviously biased, because I wrote the
relevant system. If your problem with it is that it's over-complicated and
badly implemented, I'd agree with you. That has a tendency to happen with
any large game system I write. I get so buried in thinking about everything
that
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> AUCTION 1
>
> G. 8c.
I pay Agora 8 Coins for Agora to transfer the land unit of AUCTION 1
to me.
> Wow, this was disappointing.
I think part of the low price was a lack-of-Treasuror report. I
think this was a success in that 4 different
I retract the below proposal and create _the following_ proposal
I create the following proposal
Title: Open Season II
AI: 2
Text: Create a new power 2.0 rule named "Common-Law Agreements" with the text
"Persons may act on behalf of other persons who are players in any way
the player
There is "Allowing a person to act on behalf of another person is
secured at power 2.0." in the rules. Which my proposed rule doesn't
affect, actually. So I guess G. was ultimately correct.
I create the following proposal
Title: Open Season on Acting on Behalf
AI: 2
Text: Create a new rule named
Excellent!
I'm afraid I have to CoE: CoE: CuddleBeam does not have a
Black Ribbon. The only people eligible to earn Black Ribbons in
April 2018 (to my knowledge) were players who voted FOR Proposal 8035.
Also CoE: Since you awarded the Gray Ribbon "before" the report,
you need to have it
Judge's arguments for CFJ 3639
Can a person take an action in the comment field of a dice server message?
Not only the outcome of this CFJ, but even the very existence thereof,
depends on it.
First off, I judge this CFJ TRUE. Iff the CFJ exists, it must be true, so
that seems like a pretty safe
Uh oh. I really liked G.'s policies. I become a candidate for referee.
-Aris
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 2:29 AM Ned Strange
wrote:
> I become a candidate for Referee
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:40 AM, Edward Murphy wrote:
>
> > =Metareport=
> > You can find an up-to-date version of
I vote for myself, obviously. I also vote on behalf of my zombie Nichdel
to do the same.
On 6/11/2018 10:54 AM, Corona wrote:
Nah, I'd get rid of carrying the nominations over - if people don't care
to give you a Medal of Honour, there's no reason to assume they will in the
next month. (And
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
> I become a candidate for Referee
I withdraw my nomination for Referee. -G.
I nominate myself for Treasuror. I'm not totally sure I actually want it
(and I doubt I'd get that many votes considering I've been Tailor for
over a month and haven't done anything with it, but that should be fixed
soon™), but in case I decide I do I'll at least nominate myself.
On 6/10/2018
Now that all-purpose sweeping Impeachment is a thing, the unused writ of
IAR is now worthless. I create and pend the following proposal (with paper)
Title: IAR Repeal
Author: V.J. Rada
AI: 2.0
Text: Amend rule 2531 "Referee Accountability" by removing the text that
reads "
If the Referee
I become a candidate for Referee
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:40 AM, Edward Murphy wrote:
> =Metareport=
> You can find an up-to-date version of this report at
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/adop/report.php
>
> Date of last report: 2018-06-05
> Date of this report: 2018-06-10
>
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
