I deregister.
-scshunt
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> ID Author(s)AI Title
>
> 7790+ the Warrigal, Bucky 1.0 Trust without borders
AGAINST. No representation without taxation.
-scshunt
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Sprocklem wrote:
> On 2015-08-16 16:28, Luis Ressel wrote:
>> ID Author(s) AI Title
>> -
>> 7785* G. 1.0 The New Map
> FOR
>> 7786* scshunt1.0 Monthly Distribution
> FOR
Ditto.
-scshunt
I feel like writing the Newspaper every week is a burden, it's
starting to get rushed a lot, and on top of all that, it's not all
that useful because publishing it covering one week when the next week
is coming/passed is particularly awkward.
So I propose and pend:
Proposal: Monthly Distribution
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I deputize for the Prime Minister to appoint scshunt to the office of
> Speaker.
I award myself a Red Ribbon, a Platinum Ribbon, and an Ultraviolet
Ribbon, and award comex and ais523 Ultraviolet Ribbons.
I'm going to hold off on Champion in c
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 16:51:42 -0400
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>
>> The previous intent having expired,
>>
>> I intend, with 2 Agoran Consent, to award aranea the Patent Title Nine
>> Months Long Service.
>>
>
I resign Assessor. Sorry guys, I can't quite do it at the moment.
-scshunt
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
>> Proposal: AI Fix (AI=3)
>> {{{
>> Amend the first paragraph of Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption
>> Indices) to read:
>> Adoption index is a switch posse
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:29 PM, omd wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, pend it, and specially deputise for
> the Promotor to distribute it, thereby expediting it. For this
> decision, the options are FOR and AGAINST, the vote collector is the
> Assessor, and the AI is the same as the AI of
Proposal: AI Fix (AI=3)
{{{
Amend the first paragraph of Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption
Indices) to read:
Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran
decisions and proposals, whose value is an integral
multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9, default 1.
}}}
-scshunt
I issue Trust Tokens to Tekneek, Roujo, Ienpw III, and Murphy.
-scshunt
On Aug 1, 2015 20:22, "Tanner Swett" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
> > Ok, here's what the first paradox was... What's your pseudo-judgement?
> >
> > The Not Your Turn card would cancel the effect of any card played
> > in the last 24 hours (meant as a defense card
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:16 PM, omd wrote:
> So, the recent Proposal Competition fix reminded me that those are
> still a thing, and we've never actually had one.
>
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to initiate a Proposal Competition with
> the following objective:
>
> Create a mechanic that conne
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> However, I don't believe proposal 7448's adoption index actually _was_
> 'none' at the time R106 was applied to it. According to R2034,
> "A public message purporting to resolve an Agoran decision constitutes
> self-ratifying claims that [..]
I want to make a competition, but there's a minor bug, so:
Proposal: Competition Pending (AI=1)
{{{
Amend rule 2431 (Proposal Competitions) by prepending "Rules to the
contrary notwithstanding, if at any time a Competition Proposal in the
Proposal Pool is not pending, it immediately becomes pendin
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> pp1scshunt 3.0 Tie-Breaking Votes
> pp2scshunt 1.0 IADoP Salary Control
> pp3scshunt 1.0 Blocking Power
> pp4scshunt 3.0 High-Power Centralization
I pend whichever one of these isn't already pending.
On Jul 16, 2015 16:40, "Luis Ressel" wrote:
>
> Player Used spending power (this week) total spending power
>
> ais523 12
> aranea 58
> G. 04
> scshunt
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
> is the Assessor, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
> also a valid vote).
>
> [You kno
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Until a CFJ is resolved differently, the Rulekeepor agrees with this
> more persuasive line. -G.
I CFJ { I possess the patent title "Head of the Agoran Ceremonial Mint". }
Arguments:
As comex pointed out in the discussion forum, Proposal 7
The last ratified ruleset was published on April 7, 2014. Since then,
the following proposals have been adopted without having had an
adoption index specified upon submission:
7643 Mandatory Identification
7644 Make the Birthday Holiday line up wit
7663 IADoP fix
7676 The GNP Evaluation System
767
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: IADoP Salary Control (AI=1)
I withdraw this proposal.
Proposal: IADoP Salary Control (AI=1)
{{{
Amend Rule 2455 (How to Pend a Proposal) by replacing
Each office has a spending power, which is a natural number.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Timelines (AI=1)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 2446 (The Agoran Newspaper) by replacing
> past 7 days.
> with
> prior Agoran Week.
>
> and by appending the following to the first paragraph:
> Wh
Proposal: Timelines (AI=1)
{{{
Amend Rule 2446 (The Agoran Newspaper) by replacing
past 7 days.
with
prior Agoran Week.
and by appending the following to the first paragraph:
When the Herald publishes the Newspaper for a given Agoran
week, any obligation e has to publish th
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 4. If PoA currently works where the rules are silent, then we
> have to infer multiple messages in one email (one from the
> Agent, one from the Principal). Your interpretation would
> firmly break PoA if it exists now (not that it's bad, but
Proposal: Tie-Breaking Votes (AI=3)
{{{
Amend Rule 955 (Determining the Will of Agora) by replacing
(b) If the decision has an adoption index, then if the strength
of FOR is greater than the strength of AGAINST, and the
ratio of the strength of FOR to the strength of AGAI
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Luis Ressel wrote:
>
> 7758* omd1.0 IADoP Untitling
AGAINST
> 7759* G. 3.0 minor Powers v0.2
FOR
> 7760+ G. 3.0 Next Win System
FOR
> 7761+ G. 1.7 I wonder what this does
FOR
>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> --
> 7757+ scshunt1.0 IADoP Titling
FOR
-scshunt
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 23:06:08 +0200
> Luis Ressel wrote:
>
>> I initiate an Agoran decision to determine the new Assessor. For this
>> decision, the vote collector is the IADoP and the valid options are
>> the players (PRESENT is also valid vot
On Jul 8, 2015 12:48 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Luis Ressel wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:13:31 +0200
> > Luis Ressel wrote:
> >
> > > I initiate an Agoran decision to determine the new Herald. For this
> > > decision, the vote collector is the IADoP and the valid opt
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> I intend to award myself the Patent Title Unchampion with 2 Agoran
> Consent.
I support.
-scshunt
Since people were worried about doing it via ratification:
Proposal: IADoP Titling (AI=1)
{{{
Amend Rule 2138 to read:
The Interstellar Associate Director of Personnel (IADoP) is an
office; its holder is responsible for keeping track of officers.
The IADoP's report includes the
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> A more constructive comment is: I think the balance is off here a bit.
> The timescale between "bad Tailor" (a Tailor who doesn't hand out awards)
> and election correction seems a bit off to me, and as it is there's no
> incentive at all fo
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> I intend to award myself the Patent Title Champion with 2 Agoran
> Consent.
I object.
-scshunt
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
>
>
> ID Author(s) AI Title
> --
> 7756+ Gaelan 1.0 Into the 21st century
AGAINST
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
>
> *7753 scshunt 3.0 Title Caps Fix
I award myself an Orange Ribbon.
-scshunt
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Chuck Carroll wrote:
>
> Greetings and felicitations to all Agorans, past and present, and a happy
>> 22nd birthday to Agora! Long may she live!
>>
>
> Happy birthday!
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
Happy birthday, Agora!
On Jun 1, 2015 7:51 AM, "Alex Smith" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 14:38 +0200, Luis Ressel wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 May 2015 16:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
> > Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > On Fri, 29 May 2015, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> > > > Silly idea: That the Herald instead use Rule 649 to award aranea
> > >
On Jun 1, 2015 7:28 AM, "Luis Ressel" wrote:
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
> is the Assessor, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
> also a valid vote).
>
> ID Author
I object.
On May 29, 2015 05:22, "Luis Ressel" wrote:
> Since we've now established that I actually won, and my winning
> procedure was very legitimate, too (or what would you call a win by
> proposal?), I think I deserve the Patent Title Champion.
> Unfortunately, I forgot to specify this in my
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
> is the Assessor, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
> also a valid vote).
>
> ID A
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
> On May 18, 2015 07:28, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
>> == CFJ 3447 ==
>>
>>Statement: aranea won the game.
>>Caller: aranea
>>
I award myself a Blue Ribbon.
-scshunt
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> -
> 7750+ aranea 3.0 Semi/Bi Fix, Typofix
ENDORSE the Herald or, failing that, omd.
-scshunt
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> 7747+ OscarMeyr 1.0 Semi/Bi Fix
AGAINST
> 7748* ais523 3.0 The Tailor Award
FOR
> 7749+ Henri 1.0 Amendment to Rule 2426 "Cards"
AGAINST
-scshunt
On May 18, 2015 06:24, "Luis Ressel" wrote:
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector
> is the Assessor, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is
> also a valid vote).
>
> ID Author(
Proposal: Repower (AI=3)
{{{
Amend Rule 217 (Interpreting the Rules) by replacing:
Definitions in lower-powered
Rules do not overrule common-sense interpretations or common
definitions of terms in higher-powered rules.
with:
Definitions in lower-powered
Rules are bindi
I CFJ {It is POSSIBLE for a player to win by Raising a Banner and, if a
player wins the game, a new game begins.}
Arguments: I believe R101 now takes precedence over 1023.
-scshunt
On May 11, 2015 19:02, "Alex Smith" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 13:25 +0200, Luis Ressel wrote:
> > ID Author(s) AI Title
> > ---
> I vote as follows:
> > 7745* scshunt2.0 Official Functions
> AGAINST; this implies that if an officer misses
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Luis Ressel wrote:
>
> ID Author(s) AI Title
> ---
> 7743+ G. 3.0 Agora Wins Forever
>
PRESENT
> 7744+ aranea 3.0 Slightly easier Ribbons
>
AGAINST
-scshunt
Proposal: Official Functions (AI=2)
{{{
Enact a new power-2 rule, Official Functions, reading as follows:
Where a rule assigns a duty, power, or restriction to an office,
that duty, power, or restriction applies to its holder, if any.
There is only one instance of each official du
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Sean Hunt
wrote:
>
> I also vote AGAINST.
>
> -scshunt
>
After reviewing the rules, I change my vote to FOR.
-scshunt
On Apr 27, 2015 2:59 AM, "omd" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
> >> > 7740 aranea 1.0 Foo Bar Baz
> > Here, it is clear there are two steps; winning and a
> > new game beginning. The "new game beginning" is
> > explicitly associated with continuity, but winni
I would like to become a player at this time, even though I cannot do so by
announcement.
-scshunt
In protest of not being deregistered due to broken rules, I deregister.
-scshunt
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I cast a conditional vote FOR the first proposal to have two votes
> other than this vote, PRESENT if none. -G.
I cast, unconditionally, the same vote as ais523 did.
-scshunt
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> --
> Proposal: Monthly Deportation
> Adoption Index: 1
> Author: Henri
>
> Create the following Power-1 Rule named "Monthly Cleanup":
>
> In the first week of every mo
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision
> of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collector is the
> Assessor, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a
> valid vote).
>
> IDAu
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
> 649 Herald woggle11 Nov 14 30 Oct 14
CoE: woggle's election was ineffective due to lack of consent. I
therefore successfully deputized for the office.
-scshunt
On Nov 14, 2014 5:26 PM, "Luis Ressel" wrote:
> > Also I'm particularly busy in Real Life right now, so not holding
> > offices is possibly for the best.
> >
>
> Fine by me.
I award myself a Cyan Ribbon.
-scshunt
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:35 PM, omd wrote:
> I re-initiate the Shopping Period as below, except that Bayushi
> receives an "a" card in place of the invalid "(1)" card. Please note
> that previous attempted swaps are not counted.
I trade "MAY" for "permit" and "CANNOT" for "performance", and put
I CFJ {Wooble is a player.}
We haven't had one lately.
-scshunt
I intend to deputize for IADoP to resolve the election for IADoP.
-scshunt
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> Okay, so I messed up. Let's check what actually happened. My first
> message had the sole effect of distributing 7722 (Silver Quill). The
> other distributions failed because the referenced proposals didn't
> exist (7721 and 7724 had wrong texts
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> In fact, I've made another mistake; the text of Tiger's 7721 was also
> wrong. So here's another revision:
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision
> of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote collect
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
> omd pointed out I'd reported a wrong text for Henri's proposal 7724, so
> here's a revised report. In the meantime, another proposal was
> proposed, but I'd recommend retracting it as it won't work, so
> I'll just leave it in the pool for now.
>
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 9:17 PM, omd wrote:
> *7700 1 Henri Office Salary
I withdraw my consent to being IADoP and change my vote to Henri in
the election for IADoP.
-scshunt
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Luis Ressel wrote:
>> IDAuthor(s) AI Title
>>
>> 7711 omd1.0 Wordplay
> PRESENT
>> 7712 M
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:15 PM, omd wrote:
> For each office, I initiate the Agoran decision to determine the new
> officeholder. The valid options are all players, but players who have
> not consented to hold offices (which you can still do during voting)
> are prevented from being installed in
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:23 PM, omd wrote:
> NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
>
> 7698 1 ais523 Ribbons 2014
PRESENT
> 7699 3 scshunt Immutability
FOR
> 7700 1 Henri Office Salary
AGAINST
> 7701 1 Henri Credits
ENDORSE the Prime Minister
> 7702 1 Henri Minister for
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:45 PM, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
>>> It was TtDF.
>>
>> There is nothing saying you can't withdraw an intent to a DF.
>
> There is very little reason to believe you can. Or in any other
&
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:33 PM, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:32 PM, omd wrote:
>> I think we need more gameplay. Although the points won through a
>> Proposal Competition are rather useless at the moment, still -
>>
>> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to initiate a Proposal Competition.
I register.
Proposal: Immutability (AI=3)
{{{
Amend Rule 2141 by adding:
Immutable is a synonym for power 3.
after:
Every rule has power between one and four inclusive. It is
not possible for a rule to have a power outside this range.
The Rulekeepor is hereby ENCOURAGED to reco
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:11 PM, woggle wrote:
>
>
> On 09/30/14 19:10, Alex Smith wrote:
>> [This message contains the Referee's Report, plus other actions]
>>
> [snip]
>
>> After that, I intend, with 2 support, to become the Dungeon Master, via
>> the mechanism in Rule 2426.
>
> I support.
I su
I will commit to holding exactly one office, of Agora's choice, and to
completing its duties on time, provided that all other offices are
held and the duties completed on time.
-scshunt
I deregister.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Henri Bouchard
wrote:
> --
>The Interstellar Associate Director of Personnel's Weekly Report
> --
>
> Date of last report:
Proposal: Nomination Fixes (AI=2)
{{{
Amend Rule 2154 to read:
A player CAN initiate an election for a specified elected office
for which no election is already in progress
a) by announcement, if e is the IADoP, if the office has been
deputised for within the past two w
On Jul 12, 2014 1:09 PM, "Henri Bouchard" wrote:
> Are you the actual author of that proposal?
>
> -Henri
>
I am now :/
The scoring system is broken anyways and I don't want to play now that the
fixc failed. I resign all my offices and return my chair.
-scshunt
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> CFJ 3421 (G.): "omd is known as offense most dire."
> CFJ 3422 (G.): "omd is known as oddly marked derriere."
I judge both DISMISS with arguments "[citation needed]".
-scshunt
On Jun 27, 2014 4:36 PM, "omd" wrote:
>
> I intend to deputise for the Assessor to resolve proposals 7670-7675
> (~2 days left).
>
> I intend, with 4 support, to initiate an election for Assessor.
I support.
-scshunt
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Sean Hunt
wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it. In the case of a proposal authored
> by myself, if it not already in the Proposal Pool, I first submit
> it. For this decisi
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Sean Hunt
wrote:
>
> NumAuthor AI Title
> 7679 G1 Moving Goalposts
FOR, change to AGAINST.
I don't like that the equilibrium is a win per month, but I like the idea.
-scshunt
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Sean Hunt
wrote:
>
> 7676 Henri1 The GNP Evaluation System
>
FOR, change to AGAINST
> 7677 Henri1 The Minister for GNP Evaluation
>
AGAINST, change to FOR
> 7678 G. 1
I CFJ {If Rule 1789 were repealed, the obligation on the Registrar to note
the method of deregistration of players deregistered by Writ of FAGE would
remain.}
The wording of the rule implies that the rule instantaneously creates an
ongoing obligation, rather than continuously creating an instantan
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 19 June 2014 03:51, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > The crux of the matter in CFJ 3407 is whether or not (the purported) Rule
> > 2426 is a mechanism for judicial determinations, and is hence prevented
> from
> > being enacted by (2) in the la
The crux of the matter in CFJ 3407 is whether or not (the purported) Rule
2426 is a mechanism for judicial determinations, and is hence prevented
from being enacted by (2) in the last paragraph of Rule 217.
Rule 217 states:
Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, any rule change that
w
On Jun 18, 2014 6:33 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
> Well, I wondered!
>
> I can't figure out your strategy then for changing the result... just
> don't resolve it and nothing can force you to? Haven't been following the
> bugs in the election rules.
>
> -G.
I see such a scam but do not understand wh
On Jun 17, 2014 6:28 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Sean Hunt
wrote:
> > > NumAuthor AI Title
> > > 7670 Henri1 Identification
> > > 7671 G.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 22:29 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > All players at non-zero score:
> >
> > omd: 30
> > scshunt: 24
> > Henri: 10
> >
> > [Since the win, only one office-week's worth of p
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Sean Hunt
wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it. In the case of a proposal authored
> by myself, if it not already in the Proposal Pool, I first submit
> it. For this decisi
I appoint omd as Speaker.
-scshunt
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:34 AM, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:12 AM, omd wrote:
> > I initiate an Agoran decision to initiate the new officeholder for each
> listed
> > office. For each decision, the valid options are all players, and I am
> the
> > vote collector. (As I noted prev
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> CoE on this line in Scorekeepor's report:
>
> > G. 18
>
> By Proposal 7659, I should have been awarded 50 points for
> being the only player to vote against adopted proposal 7663.
>
> I think there are other awards due to proposals
On Jun 6, 2014 2:20 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
> > 7669 scshunt 2 Saner Quorum
>
> I vote AGAINST this. I think it's a feature, not a bug. -G.
Basically we don't have a quorum right now. Instead, some weeks, the
Assessor gets the ability to arbitrarily pick a proposal and fai
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:49 PM, omd wrote:
> Prime Minister:
> scshunt
Campaign speech:
I firmly believe in the ongoing progress of Agora. I promise to keep
Agora a positive game. My opponent Henri has not submitted any
proposals in quite a while. It is optimism, not baseless and tasteless
a
Proposal: Saner Quorum (AI=2)
{{{
Amend Rule 879 to read as follows:
Quorum for an Agoran decision is the number of
eligible voters on that decision who voted on the Agoran decision
to resolve a proposal resolved most recently before the first
decision was initiated, minus 3
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> On 2014-05-26 15:23, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I intend to initiate an election for Arbitor, with 4 support.
>
> I support
>
> -Henri
>
I do so, nominating G.
-scshunt
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I intend to initiate an election for Arbitor, with 4 support.
>
> If elected, I promise to select judges following the rules guidelines
> using transparent common sense; e.g. with public random number
> generators and an opt-in / opt-out method
AND YOU WEREN'T PAYING ENOUGH ATTENTION TO REALIZE YOU VOTED ON ALL THE
PROPOSALS THAT HAD BEEN MISSING QUORUM AT THE TIME.
-scshunt
On May 25, 2014 7:31 PM, "Henri Bouchard" wrote:
> You forgot to mention me.
>
> -Henri
>
>
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> NumAuthor AI Title
> 7660 G. 2 Purses
FOR
> 7661 omd 3 Soul or Power
AGAINST because atm I see no reason anyone would use it.
> 7662 omd
1 - 100 of 2013 matches
Mail list logo
