> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: Caseload
I withdraw the proposal “Caseload”.
Thanks for the interesting discussion!
-o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
On Jun 29, 2017, at 12:10 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> 1 - Really? Okay then, I point my finger at ais523 for the reasons stated
> before.
Someone pointed out that this is now overdue. As such, I point the finger at
myself, for failing to fulfil my duties as investigator unde
You're misconstruing what e said. E said that eir assignments _did_
give everyone a "reasonably equal" opportunity to judge. I any case,
I object to the finger pointing (not that objecting does anything). I
further support the intent to enter the judgment into Moot, and do so.
-Aris
On Thu, Jun
Additionally, to this finger-pointing and my finger-pointing, I add my
observation that per ais523’s own word, the assignment was not fair to the
Arbiter and therefore was a violation of Rule 991.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:
>2 - I disagree with your conjecture - those CFJ assignments were
>reasonable and made the game flow better
I agree with that they made the game flow better but I don't see how
that supercedes word of law. Our laws are just a bit junk for these
kind of cases of making the game flow better - but
On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 08:58 -0700, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> I issue a Pink Slip to ais523 for abuse of his office as Arbiter. He
> had unduly assigned CFJs to himself in an inequitable manner, which
> has not assigned judgements in such a way that "interested players
> have reasonab
1 - Really? Okay then, I point my finger at ais523 for the reasons stated
before.
2 - Game flow is not a consideration that the rules allow for.
3 - That is completely irrelevant it requires support not lack of objection.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
1 - you can't assign pink slips - only the Referee can
2 - I disagree with your conjecture - those CFJ assignments were reasonable
and made the game flow better
3 - I object to your moot intent
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 08:58 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com
I hereby intend to render judgement 3534 moot.
I issue a Pink Slip to ais523 for abuse of his office as Arbiter. He had unduly
assigned CFJs to himself in an inequitable manner, which has not assigned
judgements in such a way that "interested players have reasonably equal
opportunities to judge
Welcome back G. Also - check your dates I think you're off by one?
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 07:11 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > The word in question is a real Arabic word, translating to "I invite" /
> > "I call" / "I appeal". If we reverse the order of the le
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> The word in question is a real Arabic word, translating to "I invite" /
> "I call" / "I appeal". If we reverse the order of the letters, to get
> «دعوأ», this is no longer a real Arabic word, strongly implying that
> the message was meant to be in logical
Judge's evidence on CFJs 3534/3535:
{{{
On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 16:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I call for judgement on the following statement : أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن
> البيان التالي
The source of the body for the above-quoted message is (with bytes
outside the ASCII range replaced by hexadeci
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Ah. CFJs 2086 and 2087. Though under different rules and purpose and
> a total of 4 Appeals between them.
Actually, the final, final result is fairly clear and relevant, so here it is
as gratuitous arguments:
CFJs 2086 and 2087 found that the sequenc
Well then:
I invoke judgement on the other statement : I invoke judgement on the other
statement
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 28, 2017, at 6:47 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> However, given the multi-lingual nature of
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote:
> I don't know, but I just filed two to find out.
Gratuitous for Quazie's 2 recent CFJs:
CFJ 1267 may be relevant:
https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?1267
I CFJ on the following statement: "In the below quoted message, a CFJ was
initiated on the phrase 'أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن البيان التالي'"
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:16 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I call for judgement on the following statement : أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن
> البيان التالي
>
>
>
I CFJ on the following statement: "In the below quoted message, a CFJ was
initiated on the phrase 'I call for judgement on the following statement'"
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 16:16 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I call for judgement on the following statement : أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن
> البيان التالي
I call for judgement on the following statement : أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن
البيان التالي
18 matches
Mail list logo
