Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/6/7 Geoffrey Spear : > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > >> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > >>> = Criminal Case 2480 > = > >>> Appeal:

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

2009/6/7 Geoffrey Spear : > On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Alex Smith wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> =  Criminal Case 2480  = >>> Appeal:                                 2480a >>> Decision:                        

Re: ?spam? BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > Rodlen intended, Tiger supported. So now someone just needs to resolve. I support Rodlen's attempt to cause the panel to destroy ais523's 4 rests and cause the panel to do so.

BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> =  Criminal Case 2480  = >> Appeal:                                 2480a >> Decision:                               REMAND >> >> Judge:      

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

2009/6/6 Rodlen : > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> >> Rodlen wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Alex Smith > > > wrote: >> > >> >     On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> >     > =  Cr

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > > I submit the following proposal (AI=2, II=1, Title="Sensible Rest > > destruction"), and intend with 3 Support to make it distributable: > > {{{ > > Replace "the appeals panel CAN and SHALL" with "any player CAN" in the > > la

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

ais523 wrote: > I submit the following proposal (AI=2, II=1, Title="Sensible Rest > destruction"), and intend with 3 Support to make it distributable: > {{{ > Replace "the appeals panel CAN and SHALL" with "any player CAN" in the > last paragraph of rule 1504. > }}} I support.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

Alex Smith wrote: > On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 07:32 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:21 -0700, Rodlen wrote: >>> Okay, I hereby consent to that rest destruction stuff. >> Oh dear, now we're going to have an argument about what "unanimous >> Support of the panel's other members" in r

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 07:32 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:21 -0700, Rodlen wrote: > > Okay, I hereby consent to that rest destruction stuff. > Oh dear, now we're going to have an argument about what "unanimous > Support of the panel's other members" in rule 2157 means. Just to

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:21 -0700, Rodlen wrote: > > Okay, I hereby consent to that rest destruction stuff. > Oh dear, now we're going to have an argument about what "unanimous > Support of the panel's other members" in rule 2157 means. Just to

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Rodlen wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Alex Smith > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > > > = Criminal Case 2480 > >

BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2480 judged NOT GUILTY by Taral

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > > = Criminal Case 2480 = > > Appeal: 2480a > > Decision: REMAND > > > > Judge: