Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (No Subject)

Your ruleset annotations have been updated. You will be credited as nch in all future distributions. On 7/14/19 3:24 PM, nch wrote: You're right, I'm rusty. And regrettably the Protonmail IMAP bridge doesn't have a Linux release yet, so I guess I'll revive this account. I register with the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (No Subject)

I award nch a Welcome Package. On 7/14/2019 2:24 PM, nch wrote: You're right, I'm rusty. And regrettably the Protonmail IMAP bridge doesn't have a Linux release yet, so I guess I'll revive this account. I register with the name nch. On 7/14/19 3:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: If you were

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (No Subject)

You're right, I'm rusty. And regrettably the Protonmail IMAP bridge doesn't have a Linux release yet, so I guess I'll revive this account. I register with the name nch. On 7/14/19 3:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: If you were hoping that the cc would register you, it likely doesn't: actions can

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

In that case, I cause Bernie to receive a welcome package per rule 2499. Also, Aris covered the replying situation rather well. -- Trigon On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, 20:00 Bernie Brackett wrote: > Bernie is fine. Also, how do I reply to you? I just pressed the reply > button on gmail, so I'm hoping

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

You're right. I wasn't thinking about that, because it's really wealth distribution, not taxes. I retract "It's death _and_ taxes". Maybe next week. -Aris On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Then, we need to rename the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Arkady wrote: And the thing here is that total votes DO matter. There are Tv = Vf+Va voters, so if 1 person votes against (i.e. Va = 1) the highest possible adoption index that could be reached is (T-1). Thus by setting the adoption index greater than (T-1) a proposal can only pass unanimously

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

How about we put to the test: CFJ: {The statement Amend Rule /yy is equivalent to Amend Rule IFF its revision number is yy.} My arguments: This seems to be the most obvious interpretation. On 13 January 2012 20:30, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:52

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On 13 January 2012 22:08, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/13/2012 04:01 PM, Arkady English wrote: How about we put to the test: CFJ: {The statement Amend Rule /yy is equivalent to Amend Rule IFF its revision number is yy.} Missing trailing quote. I withdraw the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

comex wrote: With Agoran Consent, I intend to amend the text of ? by adding this paragraph: If ehird is ever a player, any person CAN act on behalf of em to deregister em by announcement. I support. -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Benjamin Schultz wrote: That being the case, and hoping nobody beat me to it, I propose amending the text of ?? to include the following paragraph: ehird, while a member of this contract / pledge, SHALL submit all eir actions to ratification by Agoran

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:35 -0700, Quazie wrote: I post the following Sell Ticket: 1 VP, I will object or support a change to the ?? pledge. This ticket may be filled mutiple times, though only 1 time per change. This ticket does not expire until I say it

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:29 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:35 -0700, Quazie wrote: I post the following Sell Ticket: 1 VP, I will object or support a change to the ?? pledge. This ticket may be filled mutiple times, though only

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Jul 10, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: 2008/7/10 Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This doesn't seem to require that the supporters or objectors of an amendment to this contract be parties to this contract. Correct That being the case, and hoping nobody beat me to it, I propose

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:52 -0400, Benjamin Schultz wrote: On Jul 10, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: 2008/7/10 Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This doesn't seem to require that the supporters or objectors of an amendment to this contract be parties to this contract. Correct That

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That being the case, and hoping nobody beat me to it, I propose amending the text of ?? to include the following paragraph: ehird, while a member of this contract / pledge, SHALL submit

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 10, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: 2008/7/10 Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This doesn't seem to require that the supporters or objectors of an amendment to this contract be parties to this contract.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That being the case, and hoping nobody beat me to it, I propose amending the text of ?? to include the following paragraph: ehird, while a member of this contract / pledge, SHALL submit

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:45 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That being the case, and hoping nobody beat me to it, I propose amending the text of ?? to include the following paragraph:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:45 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With Agoran Consent, I intend to amend the text of ? by adding this paragraph: If ehird is ever a player, any person CAN act on behalf of em to deregister em by announcement. I object. -- Taral