I support this proposal (in that I want to become a player again).
I submit the following proposal:
make Peekee a player
AI=1
Upon the adoption of this proposal, the following actions occur in order:
1. Rule 869 is amended to remove the sentence E CANNOT register within
thirty days after doing
Prize for being registered for the shortest amount of time goes to...
Quoting Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Peekee thereby deregistered emself, so I judge FALSE.
--
Peekee
Peekee wrote:
I support this proposal (in that I want to become a player again).
You made your bed, you must lie in it. If comex hadn't deregistered you,
I was pondering doing so. I'd have done it in conditional form so that
I didn't risk deregistering myself.
-zefram
Hmmm I was going to cfj but I cant think of an argument that does not
use avatars in some form.
Quoting Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Peekee wrote:
I register as a player.
No you don't. Aren't you lucky R2145 doesn't apply to non-players.
-zefram
--
Peekee
I don't understand why we don't just eliminate the phrase the vote
collector, and from R1728(d).
Because it's non-intuitive, and it adds verbosity when announcing the
action. Dependent actions are meant to be light-weight, and there
should be no reason to have to support your own action.
The only caveat is that you'll have to
increase all the support (and objection?) indices by one.
Only the support index, I think, and only for dependent actions.
R2124(a): is N -- is N+1.
On 8/16/07, Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only caveat is that you'll have to
increase all the support (and objection?) indices by one.
Only the support index, I think, and only for dependent actions.
R2124(a): is N -- is N+1.
Support indices only exist for dependent actions anyway.
Pavitra wrote:
There are these things sitting around that want to be holidays, and I
think they should get their formal recognition.
We don't use holidays for celebratory purposes. Agora's birthday used to
be a holiday, until it was realised that this was only an inconvenience.
-zefram
We don't use holidays for celebratory purposes. Agora's birthday used to
be a holiday, until it was realised that this was only an inconvenience.
Well, we ought to do *something*...
How about:
(proto) Birthday Presents
AI=2
{{{
Amend rule 2126 by adding the following item to VCs
On 8/16/07, Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, we ought to do *something*...
How about:
(proto) Birthday Presents
AI=2
{{{
Amend rule 2126 by adding the following item to VCs
may be spent as follows etc.:
f) During Agora's Birthday, a player may spend one
On 8/16/07, Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not the way it works right now, because that's not what you
would intuitively expect. If I see with 3 supporters, then I expect
that means there are 3 additional people backing up the original
proposer. That is in fact how it works right now,
On Aug 15, 2007, at 8:38 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
On 8/15/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, and the US is regularly castigated for this by human rights
groups.
It's undemocratic.
The right to vote is a privilege granted to those who obey the law,
and I think it would be perfectly fine
On Aug 16, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On 8/16/07, Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, we ought to do *something*...
How about:
(proto) Birthday Presents
AI=2
{{{
Amend rule 2126 by adding the following item to VCs
may be spent as follows etc.:
f) During
On 8/16/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I'm open to suggestions on an appropriate color. Mauve is my
current choice.
I suggest sticking to the primary colours, because they have well-known
letter abbreviations. So far we're not using any of the subtractive
I'm open to suggestions on an appropriate color. Mauve is my
current choice.
I suggest sticking to the primary colours, because they have well-known
letter abbreviations. So far we're not using any of the subtractive
primaries (C, M, Y) or the endpoints of the greyscale (K, W).
I'm
Pavitra wrote:
4. CAN X ONLY IF Y: Equivalent to CANNOT X UNLESS Y. Similar
for (MUST, MAY, SHALL, SHOULD) X ONLY IF Y.
[[[ This is consistent with capatilizing ONLY IF. ]]]
'ONLY IF' is defined explicitly as a special phrase, and capitalized
to disambiguate whether a
4. CAN X ONLY IF Y: Equivalent to CANNOT X UNLESS Y. Similar
for (MUST, MAY, SHALL, SHOULD) X ONLY IF Y.
I'm not sure I follow this. I see this as the definition of ONLY IF.
So, ONLY IF is only defined in the context of CAN X ONLY IF Y.
So, the intent here is to also make this the
3) While we're at it, I think we should forbid inactive players from
performing dependent actions in general.
None whatsoever. I agree with 3) as well.
But it's just this kind of loophole that could potentially lead to a
magnificent scam.
But it's equally possible someone could pull a
On 8/16/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Specific information regarding Gamma Clearance is restricted to
citizens of Gamma Clearance.)
That information is restricted to citizens of Gamma Clearance. Commie
traitor. *ZAP ZAP*
1) Amend R955(d)(3) to make majority index actions require the ratio
be greater than or equal to the index if the actor is an (active)
first-class player; strictly greater otherwise.
I prefer amending R1728(d) so that the vote collector is generally
allowed to vote on actions with Agoran
On 8/16/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a) With N Supporters. For this method, the support index is N,
and the tally of votes need only include a number of SUPPORT
votes sufficient to approve the action. With Support is
synonymous with With 1
root wrote:
On 8/16/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a) With N Supporters. For this method, the support index is N,
and the tally of votes need only include a number of SUPPORT
votes sufficient to approve the action. With Support is
synonymous
On 8/16/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would this work for actions that are with N supporters and without
M objections?
We haven't got any of those at the moment. If we added one, then these
could be reworded as the tally of votes MUST include x, with the
R208 amendment
23 matches
Mail list logo
