proto-proposal: stronger definition of paradox
AI: 3
{{{
Amend rule 2110 to read
If an inquiry case on the possibility of a rule-defined action
or the permissibility of an action results in a judgement of
UNDECIDABLE, and that judgement is not appealed within a week,
Peekee wrote:
Can any entity win? non-players, fish, rocks?
Interesting question, and I certainly overlooked that in the proto.
We don't currently have any formal definition of winning, not even a rule
that winning doesn't terminate Agora. (I'd say that's game custom now,
though it was
Zefram wrote:
The distributor is an office. The distributor SHALL send eir
weekly report to each non-null forum at least once each quarter.
This could be a monthly report; it's not like the fora change very
often. I don't know whether the Distributor's workload is large
enough
Zefram wrote:
proto-proposal: allow non-player wins
Create a rule titled Non-Player Wins with this text:
When a non-player wins the game, e becomes a player.
Ed Murphy wrote:
I don't recall that offhand, and don't have time to run a full
search.
I just looked it up, to borrow the wording, and the context (which I'd
forgotten) turns out to be a proposal to have fora tracked by the speaker.
That must have been just before you came up with truthiness.
On 8/24/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The submitted form of each of these three proposals is in the proposal
pool (as it has been since late 2006).
Can they be withdrawn?
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
6 matches
Mail list logo
