On 11/04/2008, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:00 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree to the following, to become a contract as soon as one other
> > person agrees to it:
>
> Just because you don't have to proto contracts doesn't mean you shouldn't..
I
On 4/11/08, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I make the change. Also, I intend to change "The Banker who has been a
> Banker for the longest period of time shall ensure that this contract
> fulfills all of its obligations." to "The Bankers shall ensure that
> this contract fulfills all of its ob
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:00 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following, to become a contract as soon as one other
> person agrees to it:
Just because you don't have to proto contracts doesn't mean you shouldn't..
On Apr 11, 2008, at 6:43 PM, ihope wrote:
On 11/04/2008, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:00 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Bank needs to be a party to the Agoran Agricultural Association
before it can hold Crops and Water Rights Vouchers; since these
On 11/04/2008, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This could lead to a lot of changes, and a difficulty in knowing the
> current exchange rates. What about allowing Bankers to increment or
> decrement by a fixed value and then have all those changes occur at a
> set interval (say once per
On Friday 11 April 2008 5:00 ihope wrote:
> The Bank needs to be a party to the Agoran Agricultural Association
> before it can hold Crops and Water Rights Vouchers; since these are
> almost the only liquid currency we have, this is pretty important. If
> you agree to this, make sure you have it jo
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:00 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If a currency has a deposit rate, a person can exchange X instances of
> that currency for Y pens, where Y is X divided by the deposit rate for
> the currency, rounded down. The currency is transferred to the Bank of
> Agora an
On 4/11/08, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The set of parties to the Pineapple Partnership is now, and has been
> since 14 June 2007, { Zefram, comex }.
No surprise there. :)
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:24 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm already a user. When I became a user, I had not had reasonable
> > opportunity to review the PNP (I don't think I'd heard of it); now I
> > have.
On 11/04/2008, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you not read metarules.txt?
>
> 7. Players agree to be bound by the terms of the Contracts in the Contracts
> directory.
I don't think I did, no.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:24 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm already a user. When I became a user, I had not had reasonable
> opportunity to review the PNP (I don't think I'd heard of it); now I
> have. My message above constituted explicit, willful consent, which
> makes me a party
On 11/04/2008, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:12 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I join the PerlNomic Partnership.
>
> You can't join by announcement, you need to use PerlNomic's adduser mechanism.
> http://nomic.info/perlnomic
I'm already a user. Wh
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:12 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I join the PerlNomic Partnership.
>
> You can't join by announcement, you need to use PerlNomic's adduser
> mechanism.
> http://nomic.info/perlnomi
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:12 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I join the PerlNomic Partnership.
You can't join by announcement, you need to use PerlNomic's adduser mechanism.
http://nomic.info/perlnomic
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, comex wrote:
>> One thought I had is that
>> an informal statement that doesn't use the word "contract" or "binding"
>> might become binding only when the first part of the exchange takes place
>> (rather than when someone says "okay" off the cuff).
> I don't think there's any
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, comex wrote:
> {{
> 1. comex is the only party to this contract.
> }}
> it would be sufficient to identify the contract as a pledge, since no
> other type of contract besides a location allows only one party.
This is where I disagree. R1742 allows an arbitrary type of contr
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As ihope pointed out, you have to use the word "pledge" for it to be a
>> pledge, the rule says so (I didn't know that).
>
> I think I've been doing that with my pledges, but I've
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As ihope pointed out, you have to use the word "pledge" for it to be a
> pledge, the rule says so (I didn't know that).
I think I've been doing that with my pledges, but I've been verbing
it. Does that count?
-root
On 10/04/2008, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can this part be table-ified? Maybe with the members listed in the
> same section.
What do you mean? Make a table with the contracts as rows and people
as columns and put an X wherever the person is a party to the
contract?
--Ivan Hope CXXV
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, ihope wrote:
>> > If Eris gives me up to four 4 crops within seven days, I agree to, as
>> > soon as possible, give Eris the same number of 9 crops in exchange.
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
