I'd be willing to support REASSIGN for CJFs 2086-87.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 19:41, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2082a
>
> Appeal 2082a
>
> Panelist: root
> Decision:
>
> Panelist:
On Sep 7, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2134
== CFJ 2134
==
Gender Neutral pronouns(e.g eir, e
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Choice? What choice? I think the point has been made clear that the
>>> CotC and Poobah must choose as fa
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:54 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Although the new Freefall is up yet, do read it when it is up.
>
> Google doesn't turn up anything. What is it?
A web comic, I think: http://freefall.purrsia.com/
comex wrote:
> Having achieved 2 support, I judge this ancient appeal REASSIGN.
Ineffective, panel already recused (and even if it hadn't been, more
than 14 days have elapsed since the relevant statement of intent).
ais523 wrote:
> For September:
> Default Officeholderais523
> Justiciar (nobody)
> Wielder of Veto BobTHJ
> Wielder of Rubberstamp Zefram
> Wielder of Extra Votes pikhq
Have tusho and Levi lost MWP?
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although the new Freefall is up yet, do read it when it is up.
Google doesn't turn up anything. What is it?
Goethe wrote:
> I'd better switch myself to hemming and hawing. I do so. -Goethe
This was a no-op, you already were h-and-h.
Although the new Freefall is up yet, do read it when it is up.
When the PBM dice server was functional, we had subscribed it (or
otherwise approved it for posting) to a-b, so that dice rolls could
be published. Would it be useful to do the same for its clone on
nomic.net?
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Choice? What choice? I think the point has been made clear that the
>> CotC and Poobah must choose as fairly as possible or be removed from
>> office
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Choice? What choice? I think the point has been made clear that the
> CotC and Poobah must choose as fairly as possible or be removed from
> office. I submit the Protection Racket and my brief tenure as Grand
> Poobah as evide
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/5 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Proto: It Takes Two to Tango (AI=1.7)
>>
>> [ Generalizes the features of pledges to all contracts. Also adds a
>> small amount of red tape to pledge creation, by requiring the
>>
2008/9/5 Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Proto: It Takes Two to Tango (AI=1.7)
>
> [ Generalizes the features of pledges to all contracts. Also adds a
> small amount of red tape to pledge creation, by requiring the
> participation of a second person who volunteers to enforce the
> pledge. ]
O
15 matches
Mail list logo
