On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 18:35, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2008 05:32:11 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
If I have less than two 1 crops, then I
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I create the following crops in Taral's possession:
1, 6, 4, 0, 4, 4, 0, 8, 6
Your RNG hates me. :P
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 13:26, The PerlNomic Partnership
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
5794 O 1 1.0 Murphy Return of the Repeal-o-Matic
5795 O 1 1.0 Murphy Stop
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I leave for the day to go hear Governor Palin speak
I transfer one prop from BobTHJ to Barack Obama.
On 21 Oct 2008, at 05:39, Roger Hicks wrote:
I leave for the day to go hear Governor Palin speak
My condolences.
and I come back to this. I'm tempted to step back and let someone else
sort this out (since socialism is ruling the day?)I not only
have to make
sense of the RBOA, but the
On 21 Oct 2008, at 05:35, Ed Murphy wrote:
tl;dr. Does this boil down to exchange rates allow me to move assets
around with the net effect of spending X to gain X+Y, with the RBoA
correspondingly losing Y?
It boils down to ding dong, the RBoA is dead!.
--
ehird
On 21 Oct 2008, at 07:08, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 13:51, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I PBA-deposit a 5 crop and a Points Voucher (for ^34).
I PBA-withdraw a 6 crop and a 0 crop (spending ^27).
I mill 5/6=X and 5/6=X using my two Division Mills.
I mill 4*8=X and 4*8=X
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 05:35, Ed Murphy wrote:
tl;dr. Does this boil down to exchange rates allow me to move assets
around with the net effect of spending X to gain X+Y, with the RBoA
correspondingly losing Y?
It boils down to ding dong, the RBoA is dead!.
No, rather
On 21 Oct 2008, at 01:00, Pavitra wrote:
If the PBA has 6 X Crops, I PBA-withdraw an X Crop for ^18.
Sorry bud, you have no coins.
--
ehird
On 21 Oct 2008, at 12:59, comex wrote:
No, rather the former. The RBoA still has lots of Coins, so chits
have only a slightly depreciated value.
The point is, however, that all the RBoA is really useful for now is
switching to coins.
--
ehird
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 04:51, warrigal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 13:26, The PerlNomic Partnership
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
5794 O 1 1.0 Murphy
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:55, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 05:39, Roger Hicks wrote:
I leave for the day to go hear Governor Palin speak
My condolences.
C'mon nowanyone who can play in Agora is capable of independent
reasoning. Liberalism springs from a
On 21 Oct 2008, at 15:27, Roger Hicks wrote:
Liberalism springs from a failure of rational thinking
So does assuming, and so do generalizations.
--
ehird
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 22:10, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you guys get this? I got neither a sorry, you're not subscribed
nor an echo.
If the below message was not sent successfully, I send it now. I'll
see about subscribing that address to the lists.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:42
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:37, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 22:10, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you guys get this? I got neither a sorry, you're not subscribed
nor an echo.
If the below message was not sent successfully, I send it now. I'll
see about
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:39, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:37, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 22:10, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you guys get this? I got neither a sorry, you're not subscribed
nor an echo.
If the below
On 21 Oct 2008, at 15:42, Roger Hicks wrote:
Oops...and finally, through your PBA deposit net you 68 coins (instead
of 60) I am only considering 60 coins to be deposited in the RBOA.
BobTHJ
Actually, the whole thing was ineffective, due to incorrectly
specified rates.
--
ehird
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:34, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I RBOA-withdraw 10 0 crops. [-385 chits, I believe.]
this only costs 280 chits.
BobTHJ
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:37, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 15:27, Roger Hicks wrote:
Liberalism springs from a failure of rational thinking
So does assuming, and so do generalizations.
Fair enoughtouche.
BobTHJ
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:46, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 15:42, Roger Hicks wrote:
Oops...and finally, through your PBA deposit net you 68 coins (instead
of 60) I am only considering 60 coins to be deposited in the RBOA.
BobTHJ
Actually, the whole thing was
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point is, however, that all the RBoA is really useful for now is
switching to coins.
...until people start depositing more assets in the RBoA, and there's
no reason they shouldn't.
On 21 Oct 2008, at 16:13, comex wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point is, however, that all the RBoA is really useful for now is
switching to coins.
...until people start depositing more assets in the RBoA, and there's
no reason they
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:02, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join the Note Exchange. I fill the open Buy Ticket to create Note
Markers. (How many do I have to create?).
Fails as already discussed.
I create a Note Marker/Note Credit pair of each of the following
pitches:
C#, D, D#,
From the perspective of the RBOA / AAA / Vote Market (using the info
already gathered from the PBA):
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:53, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I withdraw two 0 crops from the PBA. I deposit two 0 crops in the RBoA.
OK, +50 chits
I deposit all my 37 Coins in the RBoA
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:51, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the perspective of the RBOA / AAA / Vote Market (using the info
already gathered from the PBA):
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:53, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I withdraw two 0 crops from the PBA. I deposit two 0
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:53, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I withdraw five 1 crops from the RBoA.
I deposit five 1 crops in the PBA.
OK, -330 chits. You have 460 chits remaining.
This gives me 45 Coins, which I deposit in the RBoA for 450 Chits.
45 coins deposited for 450 chits. You
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C'mon nowanyone who can play in Agora is capable of independent
reasoning. Liberalism springs from a failure of rational
thinkingyou don't have to believe it just because they told you it
was true.
Funny, I would
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 11:33:00 am Ian Kelly wrote:
I especially don't want to start a
political discussion within these hallowed fora, so this will be my
only post on the subject.
Agreed. Between the Illuminati, UNDEAD, and the People's Bank of
Agora, we clearly don't have time for
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:13 AM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point is, however, that all the RBoA is really useful for now is
switching to coins.
...until people start depositing more assets in the RBoA, and
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:33, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C'mon nowanyone who can play in Agora is capable of independent
reasoning. Liberalism springs from a failure of rational
thinkingyou don't have to
I proto the following AI=2 proposal, entitled Indictment Reform.
In Rule 1504, Criminal Cases:
remove , with 2 Support, from the first paragraph.
at the end of the list of valid judgements for the question on
culpability, add:
* FRIVOLOUS, appropriate if the initiator
On 21 Oct 2008, at 17:05, Roger Hicks wrote:
Ok, now we have a problem. Five 7 crops will cost you 360 chits and
you only have 334. I'm considering this a withdraw of four 7 crops,
and will wait on ehird to determine what occurs on the PBA side before
continuing. You have (334 - 288 =) 46
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I proto the following AI=2 proposal, entitled Indictment Reform.
In Rule 1504, Criminal Cases:
remove , with 2 Support, from the first paragraph.
at the end of the list of valid judgements for the question on
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 3:26 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5801 O 1 1.5 Murphy Left in a Huff
The distribution of this proposal may have failed; Murphy retracted it
before it was
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 21:35 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
[Actions in this message are meant to take place in order. If an action
fails, I intend to continue with the others regardless. Also, I intend
PBA actions to happen even if I have the number of Coins wrong.]
I withdraw
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
ehird (what a blatant ripoff...)
In defense of ehird, some context was lost. E submitted that before
the contest as a possible rewrite to the Rule (correcting some meter
IIRC) and when the contest started asked me if I was willing to
include it. -G.
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:09, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
ehird (what a blatant ripoff...)
In defense of ehird, some context was lost. E submitted that before
the contest as a possible rewrite to the Rule (correcting some meter
IIRC) and when the contest started
On 21 Oct 2008, at 17:05, Roger Hicks wrote:
Ok, now we have a problem. Five 7 crops will cost you 360 chits and
you only have 334. I'm considering this a withdraw of four 7 crops,
and will wait on ehird to determine what occurs on the PBA side before
continuing. You have (334 - 288 =) 46
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:18, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uggh. I need the RBoA report to sort this all out. Anyway, chits are
fungible, so resulting 65 chits is just 65 chits, so I consider it a
deposit
of 65 chits.
I'll work out everything else post-RBoA-report...
I
ttdf
Begin forwarded message:
From: Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21 October 2008 18:18:01 BDT
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bank run, hopefully working this time
On 21 Oct 2008, at 17:05, Roger Hicks wrote:
Ok, now we have a problem. Five 7 crops
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:23, Roger Hicks wrote:
I know the I deposit the resulting 65 Chits for 650 Coins fails as
ais523 got the currencies backward.
He specified that incorrect PBA rates should still work. So e
deposited 65 chits for
some coins. Ugh.
--
ehird
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 18:25 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:23, Roger Hicks wrote:
I know the I deposit the resulting 65 Chits for 650 Coins fails as
ais523 got the currencies backward.
He specified that incorrect PBA rates should still work. So e
deposited 65 chits
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:25, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:23, Roger Hicks wrote:
I know the I deposit the resulting 65 Chits for 650 Coins fails as
ais523 got the currencies backward.
He specified that incorrect PBA rates should still work. So e
deposited 65 chits for
some
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:28, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait, you can't deposit chits for coins. Yep, fails.
Soagain the real question: Did ais523 succeed in depositing zero,
four, or five 7 crops in the PBA?
BobTHJ
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:33, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:28, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait, you can't deposit chits for coins. Yep, fails.
Soagain the real question: Did ais523 succeed in depositing zero,
four, or five 7 crops in the PBA?
BobTHJ
as i said
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:37, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:33, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:28, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait, you can't deposit chits for coins. Yep, fails.
Soagain the real question: Did ais523 succeed in
ais523 wrote:
ehird (what a blatant ripoff...)
IIRC that one was explicitly presented as a revision of the rule in
question, to tighten up meter or something.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What the
hey, I also nominate B Nomic for Conductor.
Fails. At least, I *hope* I didn't miss B Nomic becoming a player.
comex wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I leave for the day to go hear Governor Palin speak
I transfer one prop from BobTHJ to Barack Obama.
NttPF. And no reason given. And Obama is not a first-class player
(as defined by Agora).
On 21 Oct 2008, at 18:58, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
ehird (what a blatant ripoff...)
IIRC that one was explicitly presented as a revision of the rule in
question, to tighten up meter or something.
No, that was Pavitra's version, which I copied wholesale.
--
ehird
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:01 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What the
hey, I also nominate B Nomic for Conductor.
Fails. At least, I *hope* I didn't miss B Nomic becoming a player.
Nope, it hasn't registered yet.
Wooble wrote:
I proto the following AI=2 proposal, entitled Indictment Reform.
In Rule 1504, Criminal Cases:
remove , with 2 Support, from the first paragraph.
at the end of the list of valid judgements for the question on
culpability, add:
* FRIVOLOUS,
root wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I proto the following AI=2 proposal, entitled Indictment Reform.
In Rule 1504, Criminal Cases:
remove , with 2 Support, from the first paragraph.
at the end of the list of valid judgements for
Wooble wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 3:26 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5801 O 1 1.5 Murphy Left in a Huff
The distribution of this proposal may have failed; Murphy retracted it
before it was distributed.
I re-submitted a revised version (named Fix
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
In this case I'm using the courts in an attempt to glean
information about the contract in question. The criminal case is not
intended to be an attack on you (sorry if you took it that way), and was
not meant to be a punishment or anything;
Way back in
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, it hasn't registered yet. Also, it isn't a public contract yet
because the B Nomic rules haven't been posted to the Agoran PF, and also
I'm not sure if the proposal to add the Agoran public contract
partnership
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* FRIVOLOUS, appropriate if the initiator of the CFJ didn't
reasonably believe that the defendant was GUILTY at the
time e initiated the CFJ. Initiating a criminal CFJ that
comes
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that
ais523 violated Rule 2143 by failing to publish a Mad Scientist's
report for the week of 6 Oct. 2008.
Hm... no.
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please let me
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 11:30 -0700, Taral wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that
ais523 violated Rule 2143 by failing to publish a Mad Scientist's
report for the week of 6 Oct. 2008.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:53, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I withdraw five 7 crops from the RBoA. I deposit them in the PBA. I
deposit the resulting 65 Chits for 650 Coins.
Five 7 crops (4 from the RBOA, 1 from ais523's personal store) are
deposited in the PBA. chit deposit fails.
I
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Pavitra wrote:
I submit the following proposal, AI=2, II=1, entitled How did the
CotC get into it?:
By the registrar not existing as an office for a while, leading to a
Cantus Cygnus that resulted in a win-by-paradox. -G.
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 12:06 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
The appeals board have requested me to determine what the referent of
One True Agora is. A Google search determines that the phrase does not
occur anywhere anywhere, except in Rule 2200, and in
On 21 Oct 2008, at 19:59, Roger Hicks wrote:
Here is an unofficial RBOA report covering the bank run scam and all
messages up until ais523's message Converging the Gamestates. In
order to calculate that message I will need to know from ehird the
number of coins that ais523 presently possesses
Here is an unofficial RBOA report covering the bank run scam and all
messages up until ais523's message Converging the Gamestates. In
order to calculate that message I will need to know from ehird the
number of coins that ais523 presently possesses (read: I need to see a
PBA report that is current
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 11:33:00 am Ian Kelly wrote:
I especially don't want to start a
political discussion within these hallowed fora, so this will be my
only post on the subject.
Agreed. Between the Illuminati, UNDEAD,
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
It was One True Agora, the phrase, I searched for. I was trying to see
if there were any references to it anywhere. I don't believe there is an
Agoran custom that that name means something; if there had been, more
references unrelated to this CFJ would
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I nominate the Monster, Bayes, the AFO, and the PBA for Conductor. What the
hey, I also nominate B Nomic for Conductor.
I am willing to have Bayes take on the responsibilities of the office,
with the caveat that note
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 16:01 -0400, comex wrote:
(The reason I'm responding to one of these mass nominations seriously
is that the idea of having Bayes as the recordkeepor for something
intrigues me. It'd be a novelty having such a fast recordkeepor, and
would certainly make scams like the
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:01 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, if you want someone more capable in the office, don't vote for
Bayes. You could vote for me, although I wouldn't be nearly as fast.
Although if root starts publishing a web report updated more
frequently than the email
comex wrote:
Although if root starts publishing a web report updated more
frequently than the email version, I for one will vote for em.
Incidentally, I haven't updated my old Conductor database since
around the time root took over, so please don't rely on it. I'll
take it offline once root's
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I submit the following evidence on CFJ 2196:
There now exists a nomic called One True Agora, which can also be
called Agora. (Wooble created it a few minutes ago in ##nomic.)
While that could complicate matters in general,
http://agora.eso-std.org/pba-report is an unofficial report which
contains a note of the
coins that ais523 deposited into the RBoA.
I now request an RBoA report which I can base calculations for the
following actions
for.
Then we can ratify both bank's reports and this will all be over.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 14:12, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, I'm also intending to (eventually) track credits and
markers. H. Accountor, what would be your preference here? I could:
* set you up to enter the data and publish the generated reports;
* enter the data myself
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 22:15 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
http://agora.eso-std.org/pba-report is an unofficial report which
contains a note of the
coins that ais523 deposited into the RBoA.
I now request an RBoA report which I can base calculations for the
following actions
for.
Then
On 21 Oct 2008, at 22:40, Alex Smith wrote:
The relevant part seems to be that I deposited a total of 551 Coins
into
the RBoA, during the scam and shortly afterward. That should let
BobTHJ
be able to calculate how many Chits I had altogether when I started
buying assets.
I think most of
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 15:15, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://agora.eso-std.org/pba-report is an unofficial report which contains a
note of the
coins that ais523 deposited into the RBoA.
I now request an RBoA report which I can base calculations for the following
actions
for.
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 22:44 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 22:40, Alex Smith wrote:
The relevant part seems to be that I deposited a total of 551 Coins
into
the RBoA, during the scam and shortly afterward. That should let
BobTHJ
be able to calculate how many Chits I
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 15:46 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 15:15, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://agora.eso-std.org/pba-report is an unofficial report which contains a
note of the
coins that ais523 deposited into the RBoA.
I now request an RBoA report
On 21 Oct 2008, at 22:46, Roger Hicks wrote:
2008-10-20 19:33 - ais523 withdraws two X crops for ^37
conditional on the
deposit succeeding. (it didn't - ed, 2008-10-21) ais523 transfers
all eir coins
to the RBoA (^551 - ed, 2008-10-21).
So, 551 coins are deposited into the RBOA?
BobTHJ
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 22:53 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 22:46, Roger Hicks wrote:
2008-10-20 19:33 - ais523 withdraws two X crops for ^37
conditional on the
deposit succeeding. (it didn't - ed, 2008-10-21) ais523 transfers
all eir coins
to the RBoA (^551 - ed,
On 21 Oct 2008, at 22:57, Alex Smith wrote:
So I deposited ^551 into the RBoA altogether.
Working out how much I deposited when is both much more difficult
and irrelevant.
--
ais523
Oh, I see. I will include a note in my report.
--
ehird
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 13:33, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the PBA has exactly six X crops, I withdraw two X crops from the PBA.
Fails. According to the AAA the PBA has no X crops.
I deposit all my Coins in the RBoA, for an appropriate number of Chits.
Per ehird's calculations
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 15:57, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 22:53 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 22:46, Roger Hicks wrote:
2008-10-20 19:33 - ais523 withdraws two X crops for ^37
conditional on the
deposit succeeding. (it didn't - ed, 2008-10-21)
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ais523 brought up another possibility so let me add: I am unaware of
the existence any pledge with the above identifier (merely backs up the
accepted COE on behalf of Murphy). -Goethe
You did not address the claim that
Please disregard this last message. It is utterly incorrect. I will repost it.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 15:59, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 13:33, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the PBA has exactly six X crops, I withdraw two X crops from the PBA.
Fails.
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 19:56 -0400, comex wrote:
I join Nomic Wars I.
I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
{
Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
Ratings; Sections of this contract whose Rating is a positive integer
are void and do not apply.
}
This
On 21 Oct 2008, at 23:03, Roger Hicks wrote:
Please disregard this last message. It is utterly incorrect. I will
repost it.
Yay! So are you up to date on RBoA matters? If so, once a [proto-]
report is posted I can
resolve the last few PBA transactions, we can ratify the reports, etc.
--
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 17:54 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I agree to the Nomic Wars contract, and object to its joining the PRS.
-Goethe
The joining fails, as it had no parties at that point and cannot survive
with one party. Did you mean to join Nomic Wars II?
--
ais523
Let's try this again - CORRECTED-:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 13:33, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the PBA has exactly six X crops, I withdraw two X crops from the PBA.
Fails. The PBA has no X crops.
I deposit all my Coins in the RBoA, for an appropriate number of Chits.
236 coins (551
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:01 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, if you want someone more capable in the office, don't vote for
Bayes. You could vote for me, although I wouldn't be nearly as fast.
Although if root
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 16:10, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Oct 2008, at 23:03, Roger Hicks wrote:
Please disregard this last message. It is utterly incorrect. I will repost
it.
Yay! So are you up to date on RBoA matters? If so, once a [proto-]report is
posted I can
resolve
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 02:43 -0500, Gavin Dow wrote:
I hereby announce that I wish to register for citizenship in Agora.
Welcome! Which name do you wish to be known by on reports?
--
ais523
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 14:25 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I agree to the following pledge, called HAL:
1. By pledge of Goethe, HAL is a biological organism that can communicate
in English. Goethe may act on behalf of HAL by announcement. Goethe
may terminate HAL by announcement.
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I submit the following evidence on CFJ 2196:
There now exists a nomic called One True Agora, which can also be
called Agora. (Wooble created it a few minutes ago in ##nomic.)
While
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
This pledge is obviously self-contradictory. If Goethe could terminate
HAL by announcement, e could remove eir right to call CFJs. By rule 101,
this is obviously impossible.
Also, HAL is not party to that pledge, so you can't Mousetrap em like
that.
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 17:54 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I agree to the Nomic Wars contract, and object to its joining the PRS.
-Goethe
The joining fails, as it had no parties at that point and cannot survive
with one party. Did you mean to join Nomic
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
I'll delete the bouncing-email watchers from the Registrar Report that I
next publish. I'll continue publishing Registrar's Reports until it's
determined who the Registrar is, and suggest that the Monster republish
them.
And these Watchers (the
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And anyway, don't these noobs due research? CFJ 1520. In fact CFJ 1520
makes the second sentence of the rule in question entirely superfluous.
-Goethe
Heh. I had forgotten about that.
-root
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Terminating the pledge is no different than terminating a
partnership. Are you arguing that partnerships can't be
terminated due to their losing R101 rights?
The argument's been brought up before...
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
? I just did ?
nevermind.
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
