On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, ais523 wrote:
One solution to this might be to implement some sort of hard
deregistration that is actually separate from the current time, with a
massive timeout on rejoining, so that people can actually leave the game
and no longer be bound by the rules.
This is too
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, comex wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Note that I don't feel this way about purely contractual obligations.
What about the other special case I mentioned, a non-player playing
through a shell partnership? In both cases,
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Craig Daniel wrote:
In my interpretation, you'd have to be incapable (as opposed to
unwilling) continuously for four days.
So: you can get rid of rests by committing suicide, or entering a
coma, or travelling somewhere with no internet for an extended period.
There's
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Charles Walker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:31 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been thinking for a while about setting up a contest which is a
nomic or is nomic-like, which would reset when
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 20:13 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
6537 0 1.0 Walker R2215 Fix
PRESENT; what would this do?
Correct a grammar/ spelling mistake?
--
Charles Walker
BobTHJ, you're now overdue on judging CFJ 2718. This is a reminder to
give you a chance to judge it before I NoV you.
--
ais523
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
A Credit573 0
A# Credit 575 0
B Credit544 0
C Credit575 0
C# Credit 555 0
D Credit553 0
D# Credit
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
A Credit 573 0
A# Credit 575 0
B Credit 544 0
C Credit 575 0
C# Credit 555
Sleep continuously for four days? :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 22, 2009, at 4:05 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Craig Daniel wrote:
In my interpretation, you'd have to be incapable (as opposed to
unwilling) continuously for four days.
So: you can get
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:18, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
For each of the following proposals, I intend, without 3 objections,
to make it Distributable:
Anarchy Anarchy
I object
Abduct the
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I can understand some of these objections, but why are you against
repealing a Rule which has only an unused definition in it?
Objecting serves to protect my right to call myself an Agoran resident
alien.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:18, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
For each of the following proposals, I intend,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:18, Charles Walker
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:38, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:48 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 09:44 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Trophy Repeal (AI=3, II=1)
{{
Repeal Rule 2105.
Repeal Rule 2029.
}}
Proposal: Guaranteed to Fail (AI=3, II=1)
{{
Repeal Rule 104.
}}
Proposal:
2009/10/22 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:38, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I can
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 17:49, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to decide the
holder of the office of Anarchist. For this Decision, the
eligible voters are all the
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/22 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:38, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I object to all pending attempts to make an interested proposal
distributable which I have not already objected to. Use a
Distrib-u-Matic or make it disinterested.
Can you do your job and deal me one then please?
--
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:26, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I object to all pending attempts to make an interested proposal
distributable which I have not already objected to. Use a
Distrib-u-Matic
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I object to all pending attempts to make an interested proposal
distributable which I have not already objected to. Use a
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:31, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I object to all pending attempts to make an
coppro wrote:
Proposal: Guaranteed to Pass (AI=3, II=1)
{{
Increase the Power of Rule 104 to 4.
}}
The hell it is. This would increase the amendment number.
Proposal: Cruel and Unusual Punishment (AI=1, II=1)
{{
WHEREAS the Ruleset is so long that forcing someone to read it would
be a
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
2247 is The Janitor. Did you mean 1750 (Read the Ruleset Week)?
Don't you think it's cruel to punish someone for winning the Janitor
election by making them read the ruleset to find things to clean?
Yally wrote:
I leave the Cookie Jar.
Ineffective, it has no provision for leaving (but you can add one
without party objection).
coppro wrote:
6525 O 1 1.0 coppro        Janitor is Useless
FOR; I play Debate-o-Matic to make this decision Democratic.
Your caste is Savage, so all your other votes in this batch
were ineffective.
I cast all of the following votes 8 times each.
Your caste is Epsilon, so the additional votes are all ineffective.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
coppro wrote:
6525 O 1 1.0 coppro        Janitor is Useless
FOR; I play Debate-o-Matic to make this decision Democratic.
Your caste is Savage, so all your other votes in this batch
were ineffective.
coppro wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
coppro wrote:
6525 O 1 1.0 coppro   Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â Janitor is Useless
FOR; I play Debate-o-Matic to make this decision Democratic.
Your caste is Savage, so all your other votes in this
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 13:45, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
===
Industrial Bank Agora Report
Date of this report: 19 October 2009
President of the IBA: comex
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
coppro wrote:
Proposal: Guaranteed to Pass (AI=3, II=1)
{{
Increase the Power of Rule 104 to 4.
}}
The hell it is. This would increase the amendment number.
it wouldn't, fwiw
--
-c.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 17:04, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
And then, to ensure I meet the 200 word minimum, I wish to include the
following (which I would have written by hand on a chalkboard, but
copy/paste was easier):
32 matches
Mail list logo
