DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6549-6564

2009-11-04 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote: 6551  1   2.0  coppro           Red      Dead Contracts PRESENT, ambiguous. with no party such that the party's basis contains a player or with no parties, and whose basis contains a player? Didn't you say you were in

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6549-6564

2009-11-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
(lest someone think I'm reactionary by voting against repeals below, I am very much in favor of the [whatever color] repeals proto that c. posted recently). I vote for the following as indicated to my max. voting limit for each: NUM II AI SUBMITTERCHAMBER TITLE 6549 0 2.0

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6549-6564

2009-11-04 Thread comex
You should bump R1698, too. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: --- --- --- Increase the power of Rule 2140 (Power Controls

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6549-6564

2009-11-04 Thread Sean Hunt
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:59 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: You should bump R1698, too. Sent from my iPhone What about 1551? It would need to be bumped to allow ruleset ratification (we should do that, incidentally), but then so would all the other rules that ratify (merely setting the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6549-6564

2009-11-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:59 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: You should bump R1698, too. Sent from my iPhone What about 1551? It would need to be bumped to allow ruleset ratification (we should do that, incidentally), but then so would all the other

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6549-6564

2009-11-04 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: The other option is not to bump anywhere, but create a new and very specific 3.9 rule for proposals:  while some other instruments of power 3 (ratification etc.) can set powerrule, proposals cannot. Third option proto:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6549-6564

2009-11-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: Third option proto: Historical Preservation, AI-3: {{ Create a new Power 3.1 rule entitled Historical Preservation with the following text: {{{ Any proposal that would cause the amendment or repeal of Rules 104, 2105, or 2029 does not take

DIS: Re: BUS: Fixing a lack

2009-11-04 Thread Pavitra
Kerim Aydin wrote: I submit the following proposal, Birthdayland, AI-1: Amend Rule 2105 to read as follows: Isn't the map traditionally supposed to be amended via scam? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

DIS: Re: BUS: Fixing a lack

2009-11-04 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: I submit the following proposal, Birthdayland, AI-1: Amend Rule 2105 to read as follows:                                _        /|      

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Interstellar Manifest

2009-11-04 Thread Pavitra
Roger Hicks wrote: On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 17:07, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: Registrar � � Yally � � � � � � � 2009-10-24 �2009-10-24 �1 � Assumed CoE: Registrar is Postulated. It may be assumed. Yally is inactive. Depending on how you interpret R2276, it could be assumed,

DIS: Re: BUS: Fixing a lack

2009-11-04 Thread Taral
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Amend Rule 2105 to read as follows: When did that become Power 1? -- Taral tar...@gmail.com Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you. -- Unknown

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fixing a lack

2009-11-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: No Yallyton? I made a list of people who were currently fairly active and there were a few too many to fit. So to be fair I decided to drop the 2009 first-time registrees (Yally and Tiger) for this round. (I'd make it Tiger Sea and The Gweat Yally

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fixing a lack

2009-11-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Pavitra wrote: Kerim Aydin wrote: I submit the following proposal, Birthdayland, AI-1: Amend Rule 2105 to read as follows: Isn't the map traditionally supposed to be amended via scam? The scam was that there was no scam. Maud came up with that one day and submitted it

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fixing a lack

2009-11-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Taral wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Amend Rule 2105 to read as follows: When did that become Power 1? When it was first adopted: Proposal 4735 by Maud, AI=1, Ordinary The Map of Agora And looking at that I was wrong,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fixing a lack

2009-11-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: Kerim Aydin wrote: I submit the following proposal, Birthdayland, AI-1: Thief. Er from whom, did someone propose a mod recently? If so I missed it, I apologize, and I'll retract. -G.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fixing a lack

2009-11-04 Thread Sean Hunt
Kerim Aydin wrote: On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: Kerim Aydin wrote: I submit the following proposal, Birthdayland, AI-1: Thief. Er from whom, did someone propose a mod recently? If so I missed it, I apologize, and I'll retract. -G. No, you stole my intellectual property by

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fixing a lack

2009-11-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: Kerim Aydin wrote: On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: Kerim Aydin wrote: I submit the following proposal, Birthdayland, AI-1: Thief. Er from whom, did someone propose a mod recently? If so I missed it, I apologize, and I'll retract. -G. No, you