On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Third option proto:
>
> Historical Preservation, AI-3:
> {{
> Create a new Power 3.1 rule entitled "Historical Preservation" with
> the following text:
> {{{
> Any proposal that would cause the amendment or repeal of Rules 104,
> 2105, or 2029 does not take effect, rules to the contrary
> notwithstanding.
> }}}
> }}I don't have hugely strong feelings about it, but aesthetically I like the fact that: 1. R104 should be able to defend itself due to its history. The newbie or other occasional repeal attempts are part of that. 2. R2105 *should* have occasional art updates. No harm in it. We're way behind there. 3. R2029 was put in by scam. I don't mind it one day exiting, but since it came in through a genuine power-4 instrument it should be required to use one to change it (which I would fight tooth and nail, but still). -G.
