DIS: Re: OFF: [PSM] Work Done (Plain Text)

2010-02-07 Thread Ed Murphy
Yally wrote: > Recent Erg Transactions Can we get these annotated, along the lines of the following? > ---start of last week--- > ---time of last report--- > Mon 01 Feb 05:33 G.RO (-2) Murphy > Mon 01 Feb 05:59 MurphyRO (-2) G. > Mon 01 Feb 06:07 copproDI (-1) Agree to Disagre

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6621-6634

2010-02-07 Thread Sean Hunt
On 02/08/2010 12:12 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: 6623 1 2.0 G.GreenHold still! AGAINST (switching voting power quietly is Part of the Fun) Then propose an amendment allowing it to be done by private message to the Assessor. Having to figure out Platonic secondary effects post-

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6621-6634

2010-02-07 Thread Ed Murphy
>> 6623 1 2.0 G.GreenHold still! > AGAINST (switching voting power quietly is Part of the Fun) Then propose an amendment allowing it to be done by private message to the Assessor. Having to figure out Platonic secondary effects post-vote-recording is Not Fun (I'm sure I've

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6621-6634

2010-02-07 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > ID: 6623 > Title: Hold still! > Voting eligibility and voting limits for an Agoran decision are > fixed according to the gamestate at the start of the voting > period. Exception: during the voting period, an eligible voter > CAN by a

DIS: Hurrah for one year of Agora

2010-02-07 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On this day, one year ago, I first (and most recently) registered to play Agora, venturing into a game of which I knew little, and expecting something quite different from reality. How quickly the time flies.

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Revert the Speakership

2010-02-07 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > [Traditionally, the Speaker was the most recent Player to win the > game. It seems trivial to assign the fifth most recent player to win > the game to be Speaker. This has the added benefit of giving Players > who are already on the List of Succession a

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6621-6634

2010-02-07 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 02/07/2010 09:07 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> I veto 6621 (3 ergs) if I can. >> I veto 6631 (3 ergs) if I can. >> I make this proposal distributable (1 erg) if I can. > > Proposal: Reduce the Recordkeepors' Burden (AI=2, II=1) Actually, how do you suppose cond

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6621-6634

2010-02-07 Thread Aaron Goldfein
> Proposal: Urgent Proposals (AI=2, II=1) This is fair idea, but it's riddled with spelling, grammar, and logic errors, including the fact that the rules will twice mention paying to convert from Distributable to Undistributable and this: In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part o

DIS: Potential proto

2010-02-07 Thread Kerim Aydin
[Note: Proposal 6632 is currently too low AI to amend Ergs] Proto: Potential Create the following Rule, Potential: Each first-class Player has an integer value called eir Potential, defaulting to 0. At the beginning of each week, each Player's Potential is set to 0. When

DIS: Re: OFF: Promotor's Proposal Pool Report

2010-02-07 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > Title: Point Blank > Author: Murphy > Chamber: Purple Ok, you must just have a database pointer wrong somewhere. Got the color right, though. -G.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6621-6634

2010-02-07 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Ed Murphy wrote: >> 6622 1 3.0 G.* GreenTake a third option >> 6623 1 2.0 G.GreenHold still! >> 6624 1 2.0 G.GreenFix hypothetical situations >> 6625 1 3.0 G.GreenProposals must obey s

DIS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Interstellar Manifest

2010-02-07 Thread Aaron Goldfein
> Registrar     Yally               2009-10-24  2009-10-24  1   Postulated Would you award me Three Months Long Service?

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Promotor's Proposal Pool Report

2010-02-07 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > coppro wrote: > >>> Title: Agree to Disagree > >> I'm going to request that Agorans vote FOR this proposal unless we see >> someone willing to step up to the plate as Notary. > > Proto:  Ratify the text and membership of the following contracts:

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Promotor's Proposal Pool Report

2010-02-07 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: >> Title: Agree to Disagree > I'm going to request that Agorans vote FOR this proposal unless we see > someone willing to step up to the plate as Notary. Proto: Ratify the text and membership of the following contracts: Airstrip One Fantasy Rules Contest (whatever else some