On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Yeah. See. I'm not a traitor. I was just trying to stimulate this kind
> of original thought.
If I had a shiny new spaceship my first thought would be to see what
all the buttons did, too.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 22:56, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, ais523 wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 19:53 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> > OTOH, if the trip fails then the Enemy gains a Leadership Token (R2293:
>> > 1/3 of a win or -4 Rests or +7 ergs), whereas if the trip succeeds the
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 19:53 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > OTOH, if the trip fails then the Enemy gains a Leadership Token (R2293:
> > 1/3 of a win or -4 Rests or +7 ergs), whereas if the trip succeeds then
> > everyone still aboard gains a capacitor (+1 erg the
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 19:53 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> OTOH, if the trip fails then the Enemy gains a Leadership Token (R2293:
> 1/3 of a win or -4 Rests or +7 ergs), whereas if the trip succeeds then
> everyone still aboard gains a capacitor (+1 erg the next week); so if it
> looks like the ship is
ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 18:44 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> I press the Record the Captain's Log button.
>
> I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a mutiny.
> (Basically: if nobody succeeds in getting the support, then Yally gets a
> bonus, and wins if he manages it twice in a mon
Proto: Reinventing The List (AI-2)
Create the following rule, The List of Succession, Power=2:
The List of Succession is an ordered list of all current
players except the current Speaker. The first (1st) position
is the "highest" ("top") position on the list and the
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Good catch. A rule that encourages incorrect judgements is a rather bad
>> thing.
>
> How about something like "To be appropriate, such a judgement (as long as it
> involves interpretation of contest instructions and does not conflict with
> t
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 17:35 -0400, comex wrote:
> > >If a court case arises with respect to the conduct of the contest
> > >or the application and interpretation of its instructions, the
> > >courts SHOULD give primacy of interpretation to the co
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Proposal: It was a good try (AI = 1, II = 1)
>
> Repeal Rules 2297-2302.
>
> End Proposal
>
> I pay a fee to make the above Distributable.
AGAINST. Please propose instead to fix the gameplay, there's nothing
intrinsically wrong with it.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 5:52 PM, comex wrote:
> This should be pretty easy to defeat, but there are only two hours
> before the Shuttle rams into it...
Note, however, that arguably the start-of-week action happens first,
so pressing buttons won't take effect until after the Shuttle is
destroyed.
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 17:35 -0400, comex wrote:
> >If a court case arises with respect to the conduct of the contest
> >or the application and interpretation of its instructions, the
> >courts SHOULD give primacy of interpretation to the contestmaster's
> >interpretations, SHOULD ju
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Proto: Contests Yet Again - Very Simple, in one rule.
>
> A player CAN make a document into a Contest without 3 objections.
> The player doing so becomes the Contestmaster. The Contest SHOULD
> be a list of instructions for playing a
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I intend, with 4 supporters, to initiate an election to decide the
> holder of the PSM office. comex's last weekly report as PSM was in
> May.
Considering we just had a PSM election that everyone ignored, this
seems fairly unlikely to help.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 4:42 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 16:39 -0400, Wooble wrote:
>> From: System Administrator
>> Subject: OFF: [IADoP] Organization Chart
>
> Err, what?
That's what happens when you leave a shell logged in as root for
wiztesting in nethack.
On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 16:39 -0400, Wooble wrote:
> From: System Administrator
> Subject: OFF: [IADoP] Organization Chart
Err, what?
--
ais523
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Tiger wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry about that, and I think I knew beforehand that I wouldn't be
> > able to create something that big that stood up to Agora's standards
> > of rigour. Still, it was adopted, and now I'm just unsure about
> > whether to view the i
Tiger wrote:
> I'm sorry about that, and I think I knew beforehand that I wouldn't be
> able to create something that big that stood up to Agora's standards
> of rigour. Still, it was adopted, and now I'm just unsure about
> whether to view the inevitable CFJs as hindering the gameplay, or as a
>
On 23 July 2010 22:00, comex wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:13, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:00 PM, comex wrote:
I CFJ on the statement: "comex has a Leadership Token."
>>>
>>> I disfavor this case.
>>
On 23 July 2010 21:14, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:13, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:00 PM, comex wrote:
>>> I CFJ on the statement: "comex has a Leadership Token."
>>
>> I disfavor this case.
>
> Me too. Also, comex, no. Don't do it. The whole Space A
19 matches
Mail list logo
