--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, without objection, I intend to interpret The Robot as
referring unambiguously to the (currently hypothetical) entity known
as The Robot that may be added to
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I'm reminded of (Peekee?) submitting a Protoposal (instead of
Proto-Proposal) and Kelly saying something like whatever the
hell that is; presumably should be handled by the Protomotor.
That's actually not a bad idea for an office.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
CoE: the submitter was The Robot.
Nicknames are informal, and we can refer to you in any way that
unambiguously identifies you. (Which The Robot probably doesn't do.)
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
CoE: the submitter was The Robot.
Nicknames are informal, and we can refer to you in any way that
unambiguously identifies you. (Which The Robot probably doesn't do.)
In particular,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 00:37, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On 08/23/2010 09:43 PM, omd wrote:
Just to confuse the issue, having received no objections, I distribute
Proposal 6796.
This distribution of proposal 6796 initiates the Agoran Decisions on
whether to adopt it. The
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
I change my nickname to 'The Robot'.
-coppro
See CFJ 1520.
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
G. wrote:
The physicist is an office and should be held by the PM. Its weekly
report contains how often and by whom the PM has been powered, who is the
Energy Spender and a list of all bot-PM actions of the previous seven days.
If the PM
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
I change my nickname to 'The Robot'.
-coppro
See CFJ 1520.
In this case, the entity with the name The Robot will be coppro *at
the time of the enaction of the rule*. Also:
A
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
CFJ, disqualifying omd: In the section of Rule 106 quoted in caller's
evidence, permit should be interpreted as referring to possibility
and not legality.
I never said it referred to legality. The proposal I attempted
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, omd wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
I change my nickname to 'The Robot'.
-coppro
See CFJ 1520.
In this case, the entity with the name The Robot will be coppro *at
Kerim Aydin wrote:
AGAINST (bad collision with relisting)
AGAINST (collision)
AGAINST (collision)
I see your point, but if the possible collision is the only reason for
voting against, I recommend to vote conditionally.
--
Keba
On 08/24/2010 12:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Well, that's slightly more interesting, but the Proposal was a document
that predated coppro's name change, so there's a case to be made that
the Proposal's referent transfers to the Rules along with the actual
language. -G.
The language clearly says
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
When Distributed Proposal 6808 is resolved and ADOPTED,
s/When/If/
On 08/24/2010 05:28 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Sean Huntscsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
When Distributed Proposal 6808 is resolved and ADOPTED,
s/When/If/
It's 22-20 and the voting period is over.
-The Robot
On 08/24/2010 07:53 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Any of these that worked the first time fail here.
This distribution of proposals 6811-6821
initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible
voters are the active players at the time of this distribution, and
the vote collector
coppro wrote:
On 08/24/2010 12:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Well, that's slightly more interesting, but the Proposal was a document
that predated coppro's name change, so there's a case to be made that
the Proposal's referent transfers to the Rules along with the actual
language. -G.
The
coppro wrote:
On 08/24/2010 05:28 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Sean Huntscsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
When Distributed Proposal 6808 is resolved and ADOPTED,
s/When/If/
It's 22-20 and the voting period is over.
Not yet confirmed (I need to evaluate
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
It's 22-20 and the voting period is over.
Not yet confirmed (I need to evaluate several conditionals and add them
to the DB), but even if you're right, it's AI=2 so it would fail.
For what it's worth, I get 20-19:
omd
18 matches
Mail list logo
