On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Ed Murphy wrote: > G. wrote: > >> The physicist is an office and should be held by the PM. Its weekly > >> report contains how often and by whom the PM has been powered, who is the > >> Energy Spender and a list of all bot-PM actions of the previous seven days. > > > > If the PM holds this office, no real person would be required to assemble > > the > > report, so it wouldn't get done (and the PM would just get rests?) > > Back when we had contracts as legal persons, Rests that would have > otherwise been gained by the contract were instead gained by the > responsible member(s)... > > >> If one or more rests would be created in the PM¢s possession, an equal > >> number of rests is created in the treasonous Energy Spender¢s possession > >> instead. The treasonous Energy Spender is the Energy Spender whose bot-PM > >> act has been most important for the creation of said rest(s), which means > >> (for example) that bot-PM act has violated a Rule or was decisive to to > >> cause the PM to hold an office and the PM fails to pull a duty of that > >> office. > > ...which is pretty much what Keba's done here.
Except... with regularly switching energy spenders it's hard to apply a "missing an asap or weekly deadline" to any particular controller. I agree this works for specific illegal actions. -G.
