On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:19 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
Evidence: I *did* reasonably believe that that message by Alex Smith
was not sent by em, for the simple reason that (due to a technical
glitch, I suppose) I had not received that message from Alex Smith. Is
it unreasonable to assume, based on
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 21:30 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Proposal Rights are important (AI=3.5, II=1, distributable via fee)
{{{
Increase the power of Rule 101 The Rights of Agorans to 3.5.
An AI of 3 is sufficient for this, as an
You know that the attempt to rename the City, omd's objection to this
attempt, the CoE and the NoV were all sent to the discussion mailing
list and have therefore no effect?
--
Keba
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 17:05 +0200, Keba wrote:
You know that the attempt to rename the City, omd's objection to this
attempt, the CoE and the NoV were all sent to the discussion mailing
list and have therefore no effect?
Gah, you're right as well. I wonder how we all missed that?
--
ais523
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 26, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I submit that this is the first entity within Agora that fits any
reasonable extent a common definition of a robot.
Hey ehird, do you still have the source to Bayes?
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 26, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I submit that this is the first entity within Agora that fits any
reasonable extent a common definition of a robot.
Hey ehird, do you still have the
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:09 -0400, com...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 26, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I submit that this is the first entity within Agora that fits any
reasonable extent a common definition of a robot.
Hey ehird, do you
The more I think of it, the more surprised I am that I can't remember
anyone trying this scam. We've had plenty of attempted hardcodings of
players into rules/proposals (e.g. G. can amend this rule) or comex
is hereby awarded X) but I can't remember anyone trying to change
their name to
I assume my email client has made a mistake, this message should just be
ignored.
--
Keba
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Proposal 6821 (Purple, AI=2.1, Interest=1) by G.
(coauth: coppro/The Robot)
Relisting
[...]
Amend Rule 2255 to read:
A rule with a power equal to or greater than this rule may
associate a Position Name with a specific position on the List of
On 08/26/2010 04:08 PM, Keba wrote:
Well, what's about a scam like I change my name to Crown Prince (or
any other Courtier)? I don't know whether the voting limits are
increased by re-naming, but at least the special duties and powers
should apply, if coppro's (or the Robot's?) scam worked.
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 07:49 +, Alex Smith wrote:
I set CFJ 2835's II to 1, then judge it FALSE. The rule is unambiguous
(although quite possibly broken), and the caller's arguments are
correct.
I award myself a capacitor for the farad I gained from the above-quoted
judgement.
--
ais523
On 08/26/2010 11:11 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I submit the following 3-line public document, TheRobot.
10 PRINT I AM THE ROBOT. I DO THE ROBOT DANCE.
20 REM G. MAY MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT BY ANNOUNCEMENT
30 GOTO 10
I submit that this is the first entity within Agora that fits any
reasonable extent
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 08/26/2010 11:11 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I submit the following 3-line public document, TheRobot.
10 PRINT I AM THE ROBOT. I DO THE ROBOT DANCE.
20 REM G. MAY MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT BY ANNOUNCEMENT
30 GOTO 10
I submit that this is the first
G. wrote:
The more I think of it, the more surprised I am that I can't remember
anyone trying this scam. We've had plenty of attempted hardcodings of
players into rules/proposals (e.g. G. can amend this rule) or comex
is hereby awarded X) but I can't remember anyone trying to change
On 08/26/2010 05:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 08/26/2010 11:11 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I submit the following 3-line public document, TheRobot.
10 PRINT I AM THE ROBOT. I DO THE ROBOT DANCE.
20 REM G. MAY MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT BY ANNOUNCEMENT
30 GOTO 10
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 16:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Gratuitous:
The datestamps showing up in my mailbox are:
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:48:22 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:49:45 -0500 (CDT)
which are past, and match the time received by agoranomic.org in timezone as
well as time.
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 16:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Gratuitous:
The datestamps showing up in my mailbox are:
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:48:22 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:49:45 -0500 (CDT)
which are past, and match the time received by
On 27/08/10 04:35, Kerim Aydin wrote:
The more I think of it, the more surprised I am that I can't remember
anyone trying this scam. We've had plenty of attempted hardcodings of
players into rules/proposals (e.g. G. can amend this rule) or comex
is hereby awarded X) but I can't remember anyone
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 16:34 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
The document declared its own name in its content, so that is its name
to itself. I readily admit that this does not *absolutely guarantee*
that it has that name in Agoran Legal Practice. However, we have
accepted almost every
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I'm not sure how the received by agoranomic date can be before you sent it,
unless someone has their clock wrong. That agoranomic date is consistent
with the time my server received it a few mins later and the time I
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Michael Norrish
michael.norr...@nicta.com.au wrote:
I think I remember something similar. I certainly wrote a judgement that
defeated such an attempt. I used the Alice Through the Looking Glass
argument that being called something, and having something as a
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:41 -0400, omd wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I'm not sure how the received by agoranomic date can be before you sent
it,
unless someone has their clock wrong. That agoranomic date is consistent
with the time my
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 23:32 +0100, ais523 wrote:
NoV: coppro violated the power-1 rule 2215 by stating that e changed eir
nickname, when in common usage people are still calling em coppro
rather than The Robot and thus The Robot is not eir nickname.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:49 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
You can start sending the email, but stop halfway through, and later on,
finish sending the email (and you don't need to have specified all the
content of the email by this point). For some reason, the timestamp
given
omd wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Michael Norrish
michael.norr...@nicta.com.au wrote:
I think I remember something similar. Â I certainly wrote a judgement that
defeated such an attempt. Â I used the Alice Through the Looking Glass
argument that being called something, and having
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I should look this up, but note that we have in the past accepted
dictatorship rules of the form [player name] CAN do whatever by
announcement without any special explicitness, and currently have a
(non-scam) rule that
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
I change my nickname to 'The Robot'.
-coppro
I publish a Notice of Violation accusing coppro of violating rule 2170
(power 3) by changing eir
28 matches
Mail list logo
