Warrigal wrpte:
I believe I have 10 ergs and 21 rests. As many times as possible, I
spend 3 ergs to destroy a rest in my possession.
I'm sorry for not reporting yesterday or the day before yesterday. But
you possessed only 7 ergs, so you spent 2*3 ergs to destroy 2 Rests. You
have one erg left.
Warrigal wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I pay a fee to initiate an election for Pariah.
If possible, I nominate myself.
—Tanner L. Swett
You are already nominated, because you are the current holder of that
office.
--
Keba
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I pay a fee to initiate an election for Pariah.
If possible, I nominate myself.
Fails; you were already an accepted nominee by default.
This needs to be a CoE.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Warrigal wrpte:
I believe I have 10 ergs and 21 rests. As many times as possible, I
spend 3 ergs to destroy a rest in my possession.
I'm sorry for not reporting yesterday or the day before
omd worte:
This needs to be a CoE.
Hm, which error should I claim? I'm relatively sure e believed e had
that amount of ergs and rests. And doing something as many times as
possible is not an error of course.
--
Keba
On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
omd worte:
This needs to be a CoE.
Hm, which error should I claim? I'm relatively sure e believed e had
that amount of ergs and rests. And doing something as many times as
possible is not an error of course.
Nevermind, I had a
On 22 September 2010 21:11, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On 09/22/2010 12:19 PM, Keba wrote:
Proposal No Voting Limit Timing Scams (AI=2, II=1, distributable via
fee)
{{{
Amend Rule 2279 Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions by replacing
Take the Influence Level
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Woulsn't it remove the Assessor's ability to influence timing scams,
by making eir choice of when to resolve the decision meaningless for
this prupose?
Better that the Assessor can pull timing scams than everyone
On 09/22/2010 03:49 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 22 September 2010 21:11, Sean Huntscsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On 09/22/2010 12:19 PM, Keba wrote:
Proposal No Voting Limit Timing Scams (AI=2, II=1, distributable via
fee)
{{{
Amend Rule 2279 Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions by
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
Take the Influence Level associated with the player's position
on the list of succession at the beginning of this week, or 5
if the player is the Speaker.
[It would be much easier to track then and it should
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:19 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Further gratuitous arguments: This is a case of if X, then ... where X
is impossible being trivially true. It's different from if the rules
were somehow modified such that X could come about, then most
likely ...,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:19 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Further gratuitous arguments: This is a case of if X, then ... where X
is impossible being trivially true. It's different from if the rules
were somehow modified such that X could come about, then most
likely ...,
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Locking it at the end of the voting period as now is similar to locking it
at the beginning of the week, except that if someone pulls a last-minute
spend, there's no time for others to respond (by for example trying to
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:04 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Locking it at the end of the voting period as now is similar to locking it
at the beginning of the week, except that if someone pulls a last-minute
spend,
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, omd wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Locking it at the end of the voting period as now is similar to locking it
at the beginning of the week, except that if someone pulls a last-minute
spend, there's no time for others
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, ais523 wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 20:50 +0100, ais523 wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:55 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2867
16 matches
Mail list logo
