Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

By the way, no need to be sorry; many new players have problems sending their emails right to start with. Welcome! :)

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On 29 June 2011 01:03, Joshua Murphy wrote: > Sorry again. I'm kinda new at this. I'll use a divider made out of -'s from > now on. Anybody know a way to make yahoo bottom-post by default? Your email was still sent as HTML, not plain text; the divider doesn't matter. (You may be able to send as p

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

Gmail ftw. Also, oh hai. Welcome to this wonderful land of Nomickiness. =) Disclaimer: I object to Math321's registration. Having received no objection, I do so. ~ Roujo On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:11 PM, ais523 wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:03 -0700, Joshua Murphy wrote: > >> Sorry again. I'

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:03 -0700, Joshua Murphy wrote: > Sorry again. I'm kinda new at this. I'll use a divider made out of -'s > from now on. Anybody know a way to make yahoo bottom-post by default? I think I'm the only other Yahoo! user here, and I mostly use a separate client, communicating w

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

From: Eric Stucky To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 7:33 PM Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration On Jun 28, 2011, at 4:14 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 11-06-28 04:09 PM, Joshua Murphy wrote: >> Does that mean I win? > > Check the rules. > Also, don't top-post. Bo

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Jun 28, 2011, at 4:14 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 11-06-28 04:09 PM, Joshua Murphy wrote: >> Does that mean I win? > > Check the rules. > Also, don't top-post. Bottom-posting is the custom in Agora and top-posting > will just confuse things to the point where conversations can't be followed >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

  From: Sean Hunt To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 7:14 PM Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration On 11-06-28 04:09 PM, Joshua Murphy wrote: > Does that mean I win? Check the rules. Also, don't top-post. Bottom-posting is the custom in Agora and top-posting wi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On 11-06-28 04:09 PM, Joshua Murphy wrote: Does that mean I win? Check the rules. Also, don't top-post. Bottom-posting is the custom in Agora and top-posting will just confuse things to the point where conversations can't be followed -scshunt

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

Does that mean I win? From: ais523 To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 6:17 PM Subject: Re: BUS: Registration On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 10:12 -0700, Joshua Murphy wrote: > I hereby register with the nickname o

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:17 PM, ais523 wrote: > Arguments: The alleged "statement" of the CFJ created earlier in this > message is not actually a statement, but an email header, which cannot > sensibly have a truth value, and is anyway not a statement in the > ordinary-language sense. Thus, with

DIS: Re: BUS: Inactivity

And I'm back. So yeah. =P ~ Roujo On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:03 PM, omd wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Charles Walker > wrote: >> I intend, without objection, to make Droowl inactive. >> I intend, without objection, to make Roujo inactive. > > I object to both, in an attempt to a

DIS: Re: BUS: Flawless Victory

On 11-06-28 06:41 AM, Charles Walker wrote: I submit the following proposal: {{ Flawless Victory (AI 1.7) Amend Rule 2343 (Victory Cases) by removing "with support". Award the Patent Title Champion to Walker. }} I would vote for the first part but not the second, as you'll still eventually

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:12, Joshua Murphy wrote: > I hereby register with the nickname of Math321. Welcome!

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals

On 28 June 2011 20:11, omd wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:05 PM, omd wrote: >> Proposal: General costs (AI=3) > Amend Rule 1607 (The Promotor) by replacing "as a Spending Action" > with "for a cost of 5 points". Why get rid of changing costs as a dependent action? It needn't necessarily app

DIS: Re: BUS: Flawless Victory

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Charles Walker wrote: > I submit the following proposal: > > {{ Flawless Victory (AI 1.7) > > Amend Rule 2343 (Victory Cases) by removing "with support". > > Award the Patent Title Champion to Walker. > > }} Maybe also decrease the appeal period for victory cases

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: We need more patent titles

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Charles Walker wrote: > On 28 June 2011 07:45, Ed Murphy wrote: > > (As you might guess, this is a Spelunking entry.) > > CoE: I don't think it is. The proposal does not attempt to amend or > repeal any goals, it isn't a CFJ and your game actions did not > critically rely o

DIS: Re: BUS: Flawless Victory

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Charles Walker wrote: > I submit the following proposal: > > {{ Flawless Victory (AI 1.7) > > Amend Rule 2343 (Victory Cases) by removing "with support". > > Award the Patent Title Champion to Walker. > > }} I was about to say this judicial win process was taking way too

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: We need more patent titles

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Charles Walker wrote: > On 28 June 2011 07:45, Ed Murphy wrote: >> (As you might guess, this is a Spelunking entry.) > > CoE: I don't think it is. The proposal does not attempt to amend or > repeal any goals, it isn't a CFJ and your game actions did not > critical

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: We need more patent titles

On 28 June 2011 07:45, Ed Murphy wrote: > (As you might guess, this is a Spelunking entry.) CoE: I don't think it is. The proposal does not attempt to amend or repeal any goals, it isn't a CFJ and your game actions did not critically rely on any of the goals. The same goes for omd's entry (if it