On 27 September 2012 02:23, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Clerk's Docket
Date of this report: Thu 26 Sep 12
Date of last report: Thu 23 Aug 12
(All times are UTC)
Unqualified (Rule 1868)
---
All of these players are supine, except as noted.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:34 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
[This currently definitely conflicts with Rule 105 (Rule Changes) and
might conflict with Rule 2140 (Power Controls Mutability), as the
Rulekeepor is not an instrument.]
I would assume that it does not conflict with Rule 2140, as
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Benjamin Schultz
ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote:
If you wanted a dictatorship in the true spirit of Agora, try scamming a
non-player into the dictator position.
--
OscarMeyr
Bucky?
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, omd wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Also: fun's fun, but I will also deregister if scshunt persists in these
changes. Consider that an objection, as well.
Oh, come on. Although I feel obliged to counter-scam (not
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Benjamin Schultz
ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote:
If you wanted a dictatorship in the true spirit of Agora, try scamming a
non-player into the dictator position.
--
OscarMeyr
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Craig Daniel wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Benjamin Schultz
ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote:
If you wanted a dictatorship in the true spirit of Agora, try scamming a
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote:
I thought quite closely about the Prerogative of Prejudice. I wanted
something cool and powerful, but not entirely absurd. My rationale is
that Prejudice is not truly a just punishment, and should not be
considered a judicial resolution to controversy
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote:
I thought quite closely about the Prerogative of Prejudice. I wanted
something cool and powerful, but not entirely absurd. My rationale is
that Prejudice is not truly a just
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 14:06 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
This is a Victory Announcement: The rule entitled 'Win by Junta'
states that I can cause it to make arbitrary rule changes by
announcement, therefore I satisfy the Winning Condition of
Dictatorship.
This almost certainly has to reference
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote:
I thought quite closely about the Prerogative of Prejudice. I wanted
something cool and powerful, but not entirely absurd. My
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:09 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 14:06 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
This is a Victory Announcement: The rule entitled 'Win by Junta'
states that I can cause it to make arbitrary rule changes by
announcement, therefore I satisfy the
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:09 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 14:06 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
This is a Victory Announcement: The rule entitled 'Win by Junta'
states that I can cause it to make arbitrary rule changes
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote:
Enact a rule with power 1 reading 'Anyone other than Machiavelli CAN,
with 2 support, cause this rule to amend itself by replacing all
instances of the name Machiavelli with any other person's
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote:
Enact a rule with power 1 reading 'Anyone other than Machiavelli CAN,
with 2 support, cause this rule to amend itself by replacing all
instances of the
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I just want to be clear about something. I see where you make yourself
speaker, but I've missed the place where you remove yourself from having
power-3. Where does that happen?
-G.
I'll do it by announcement before
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 12:11 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote:
Enact a rule with power 1 reading 'Anyone other than Machiavelli CAN,
with 2 support, cause this
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 12:11 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote:
Enact a rule with power 1 reading 'Anyone other than
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Ah, yes. I create a slave golem named scshunt CAN deregister. G. can cause
this rule to amend itself by announcement. No one
Since slave golems are supposed to be repealed in the same set of
actions as the creation
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Ah, yes. I create a slave golem named scshunt CAN deregister. G. can cause
this rule to amend itself by announcement. No one
Now I am conflicted. On the one hand, I don't want to just give
someone else a
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, omd wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Ah, yes. I create a slave golem named scshunt CAN deregister. G. can
cause
this rule to amend itself by announcement. No one
Since slave golems are supposed to be repealed
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, omd wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
The rule says the text needs to be the name of a person. Once a
name has been associated with a person, that text is still the name
of a particular person even if that person ceases
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Ah, yes. I create a slave golem named scshunt CAN deregister. G. can
cause
this rule to amend itself by announcement. No one
Now I am conflicted. On the one hand, I
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Enact a rule with power 1 reading 'Anyone other than Machiavelli CAN,
with 2 support, cause this rule to amend itself by replacing all
instances of the name Machiavelli with any other person's name.'
Eh, lemme
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Is Abraham Lincoln the name of a person? Yes it is.
I'd say it's arguable - well, maybe a clearer example, since dead
persons can be considered persons (but aren't in Agora), is whether
Bill Clinton is the name of a
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Is Abraham Lincoln the name of a person? Yes it is.
I'd say it's arguable - well, maybe a clearer example, since dead
persons can be considered persons
On 09/28/2012 04:29 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Is Abraham Lincoln the name of a person? Yes it is.
I'd say it's arguable - well, maybe a clearer example,
26 matches
Mail list logo
