On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Official Functions (AI=2)
I guess you can remove the similar text in Rule 208 along with this.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> CFJ: A violation of R2446 has occurred this week.
I'll favour this case, if Agora will let me impose my particular model of
time onto the game.
Sean
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:40:06 -0400
Sean Hunt wrote:
> There is only one instance of each official duty
I am vaguely uneasy with this sentence.
--
aranea
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I had an idea some years ago of explicitly defining how official duties
> worked,
> that would explicitly handle cases like someone coming into office
> immediately
> before a deadline. Perhaps it's time to revive that?
Yah, it's definitely a patchwor
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> >
> > 3. The Cautious CAN resolve the Moot 4 or more days after
> > initiating it, and SHALL do so within 14 days of
> > initiating it. E does so by announ
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>
> 3. The Cautious CAN resolve the Moot 4 or more days after
> initiating it, and SHALL do so within 14 days of
> initiating it. E does so by announcing the selection of
> a single option of eir c
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > Amend Rule 911 (Motions and Moots) to read:
> > [..]
> > A judgement assigned to any CFJ within the past two weeks CAN be
> > tabled for Moot by any Player with 2 support, u
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Luis Ressel wrote:
> > that's a no-op, as I consider the definition of "game" in Rule 1023
> > to be the relevant one here: "When used as a period of time, a
> > "game" is the period of time between a pivo
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Amend Rule 911 (Motions and Moots) to read:
> [..]
> A judgement assigned to any CFJ within the past two weeks CAN be
> tabled for Moot by any Player with 2 support, unless that
> judgement has already been tabled for
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:27:45 +0100
Alex Smith wrote:
> > 7740 aranea 1.0 Foo Bar Baz
> AGAINST. Regardless as to the debate about whether this ends the game
> as a whole (a chance I don't really want to take, although I don't
> see how it could as rule 1698 outpowers it), I'm not going to g
10 matches
Mail list logo
