On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 16:28, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Actually, I think "at will" is a very broken concept here. The point of
> it in R2551 is to allow the transfer of assets that a player CAN transfer
> however e likes anyway. However, the whole point of zombie security is
> t
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 14:18, James Cook wrote:
> Narrow comment: "except its interpretation" would make more sense to
> me than "but does not include its interpretation"; the latter feels
> like a bit of a contradiction (and is longer).
>
> Broader comment: Any reason for this proposal, beyond tr
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 2:53 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-business
wrote:
> I’m happy to be an interested judge and take a heavier-than-usual load
Thanks! And thanks to everyone who's volunteered so far, I'll get
assignments out over the next day.
> do I have to do anything specific to get out of
On 2/18/20 4:52 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> 8323* Jason3.0 Secure Ribbons
> AGAINST. I think it's already de-facto secured because you have to modify
> the Ribbons rule to add ribbons. The text: "The types of Ribbon, and the
> methods of obtaining them, ar
On 2/18/2020 11:56 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/18/20 2:00 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 2/18/2020 10:45 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> For the purpose of such a auction, to transfer a zombie to a
>>> player is to set that zombi
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 2:55 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Perhaps relevant: CFJ 3762 [0], which concluded both that a person CAN
> perform a certain action and that that action is IMPOSSIBLE.
>
> [0]: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3762
H. I feel like that ca
> CFJ: Falsifian initiated a zombie auction this month.
If I don't hear comments to the contrary soon, I'm going to assume
this was TRUE and announce the end of the auction.
Mostly called the CFJ to see if anyone spots bugs in my reasoning. I
might even withdraw the CFJ if people are generally in
On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 15:24 -0500, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: De-secure Black Ribbons
>
> Author: Jason
>
> Co-authors:
>
> AI: 3.0
>
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing the text "This rule does not
> specify any methods of
On 2/18/20 2:00 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/18/2020 10:45 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> For the purpose of such a auction, to transfer a zombie to a
>> player is to set that zombie's master switch to that player, and
>> Agora CAN transfer zom
On 2/18/20 2:49 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 2/18/2020 11:43 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:04, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>> On 2/18/2020 10:45 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
For the purpose of
On 2/18/2020 11:43 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:04, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 2/18/2020 10:45 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> For the purpose of such a auction, to transfer a zombie to a
>>> player is to
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:40, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 2/18/20 2:27 PM, James Cook wrote:
> > You can use the word "grant" as defined by rule 2577. E.g. "A person
> > CAN grant emself a specified number of blots by announcement.".
>
>
> Sure, but I don't think that's worth retra
> For the purpose of such a auction, Agora CAN transfer zombies at
> will, and when Agora would transfer a zombie to a player, this
> rule sets the zombie's master switch to that player.
>
> - Falsifian
Does R2125 mean that I need to state an explicit mechanism here? E.g.
"this r
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:04, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 2/18/2020 10:45 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> > For the purpose of such a auction, to transfer a zombie to a
> > player is to set that zombie's master switch to that player, and
> > Agora CA
On 2/18/20 2:27 PM, James Cook wrote:
> You can use the word "grant" as defined by rule 2577. E.g. "A person
> CAN grant emself a specified number of blots by announcement.".
Sure, but I don't think that's worth retracting and resubmitting the
proposal.
--
Jason Cobb
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 22:23, Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
> A person CAN, by announcement, create a specified number of blots in
> eir possession.
You can use the word "grant" as defined by rule 2577. E.g. "A person
CAN grant emself a specified number of blots by announcement.".
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 19:12, Alexis Hunt via agora-business
wrote:
> Proposal: Unsubstantive interpretation (AI=3)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 2140 (Power Controls Mutability) by replacing 'A
> "substantive" aspect of an instrument is any aspect that affects the
> instrument's operation.' with 'A "substan
On 2/18/2020 10:45 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> For the purpose of such a auction, to transfer a zombie to a
> player is to set that zombie's master switch to that player, and
> Agora CAN transfer zombies by willing it to be done.
Did I miss a new definition of
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 17:07, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 14:04, James Cook via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > As I pointed out in response to Murphy's "Fix Auctions" proposal, I
> > don't think it works, because master is secured at power 2.
> >
> > How about
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 17:34, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 11:17, James Cook via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > This is a counter-proto to Alexis's "Ratification by Legal Fiction", in
> > the sense that I think it also fixes the problem of ratification
> > failin
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 3:16 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > At least 2 or 3 times, someone's actually written a FAQ, and everyone
> > there at the time learns what they need to by editing/commenting on
> > it, then by the time someone else need
21 matches
Mail list logo
