On 5/20/20 2:10 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> I'm tired and I'm sure this has obvious mistakes but I believe in getting
> things out there for review as soon as they're presentable, so here's the
> Sets
> proposal. Please tear it apart. Trigon I listed you as a co-author because
> the
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 9:47 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 5/20/20 2:10 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Amend rule 2350 "Proposals" by replacing:
> >
> > Creating a proposal adds it to the Proposal Pool.
> >
> > with:
> >
> > A player CAN add a proposal to th
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 8:58:19 AM CDT Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 9:47 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
>
> wrote:
> > On 5/20/20 2:10 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > Amend rule 2350 "Proposals" by replacing:
> > > C
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 8:47:26 AM CDT Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/20/20 2:10 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I'm tired and I'm sure this has obvious mistakes but I believe in getting
> > things out there for review as soon as they're presentable, so here's the
> > Set
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 8:47:26 AM CDT Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> > A player CAN, by announcement, pay a 'set' of X Cards of the same type
> > to create in eir possession Y corresponding Products. The value of X
>
> > determines the value of Y in the following ways:
> Pedantry: w
On 5/19/2020 2:56 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you wrote:
>> I don't like this idea. The history of this provision is that I gave a CFJ
>> judgement essentially establishing something like this. Everyone
>> (especially G.) thought it was a terrible
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 9:06 AM grok wrote:
> I would like to be added to the judging pool
>
> -grok
The judge of the excellent CFJ 3514 is welcomed back to the bench.
> > That could probably be fixed, but it does seem to change the way at
> > least I was thinking of dependent actions. My understanding was:
> > dependent actions are methods; R2595 says how the method works;
> > R2595's implementation happens to defer to the "by announcement"
> > method.
> >
>
> A
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 00:33, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/19/2020 5:08 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> > My biggest concern here is that the budgets will get set wrong, we'll
> > run out of money for something important half way through the quarter,
> > and then
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 01:26, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, "Mooting moots", co-author R. Lee, AI-1.7:
>
>
>
> Amend Rule 911 (Motions and Moots) by deleting all the text from "If a
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 02:50, Aris Merchant via agora-business
wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 7:45 PM James Cook via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > > I thought there was another error, but can't seem to find it.
> > >
> > > -Aris
> >
> > 8382 has the wrong title in the full text section.
>
>
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:07 PM James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Why the third requirement? What if someone notices a problem with a
> judgement 10 days after it's assigned, and there was no motion to
> reconsider?
The idea is a fixed progression: first you remand via a motion to give
the
Trying to get a sense of how the numbers would work out:
As far as I can tell, cards are created as follows:
* When the game is enacted or someone wins it. (1 Card of each type per player)
* When a player gets a welcome package. (1 Card of each type)
* Each officer can create 1 card per month.
If
> > I had been under the impression that the current case of CFJ 3831 is
> > sort of like that, since I don't remember people disagreeing with the
> > judgement until somewhat later.
>
> Yes the main issue was there wasn't a peep of complaint for the first
> 2 weeks (at least that I saw). There sh
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:45 PM James Cook wrote:
> > > I had been under the impression that the current case of CFJ 3831 is
> > > sort of like that, since I don't remember people disagreeing with the
> > > judgement until somewhat later.
> >
> > Yes the main issue was there wasn't a peep of compla
Archived at https://github.com/AgoraNomic/Reportor/tree/master/weekly_summaries
Report for the week of 2020-05-11..17:
# Summary
Last Week in Agora is back to report on an Agora abuzz with activity.
This week, Cuddle Beam appeals to Agorans to keep better historical
records. Fortunately, much
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 5:37:55 PM CDT James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Trying to get a sense of how the numbers would work out:
>
> As far as I can tell, cards are created as follows:
> * When the game is enacted or someone wins it. (1 Card of each type per
> player) * When a player g
On Thursday, 14 May 2020, 14:48:20 GMT, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/14/2020 12:14 AM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 5/14/20 1:06 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/14/2020 12:00 AM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> >>> On 5/13/20 5:54 PM, nch
On Thursday, 14 May 2020, 19:28:38 GMT, James Cook via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 20:07, David Nicol via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > (1) judiciary thing: craft some immutables that allow contracts to specify
> > Agora Nomic Arbitration Services as their venue of dispute
On 5/20/20 9:05 PM, nch via agora-business wrote:
> [Below is sets v1.0. If you read 0.9 and just want to know what's different,
> look here: https://github.com/nichdel/AgoranProposal/compare/
> 60f39a824ff590d38877fbce92c673e94a282a60..d27528f29df072934f71764e593d03eea8411954]
>
> I submit the fo
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 8:30:24 PM CDT Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> The important bit is "neither its text nor any of the aforementioned
> attributes can be changed". This means the attempt to change the
> coauthors is INEFFECTIVE under R2240.
>
> --
> Jason Cobb
Thanks for the qu
On Tuesday, 19 May 2020, 16:55:10 GMT, nch via agora-business
wrote:
> By my math this eliminates 108 words from the rules, and more importantly
> makes announcement default so it doesn't need to be included in new rules (and
> therefore can't accidentally be left out). I think this needs some c
On Wednesday, 20 May 2020, 13:47:34 GMT, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/20/20 2:10 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Amend rule 2350 "Proposals" by replacing:
>>
>> Creating a proposal adds it to the Proposal Pool.
>>
>> with:
>>
>> A player CAN add a proposal to the Proposal
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:05 PM nch via agora-business
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 8:05:26 PM CDT nch via agora-business wrote:
> > Title: Sets v1.0
> > Author: nch
> > Co-Authors: Trigon, Falsifian, PSS, Jason Cobb
> > AI: 3
>
> I withdraw Sets v1.0 and submit the following proposal.
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
