On Wednesday, 10 June 2020, 02:04:58 GMT+1, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> What follows is a proto-contract to provide independent dispute
> resolution for alleged contract violations. Like arbitration often is in
> the real world, this can be unfair and biased, and it lacks an
On 6/9/20 9:35 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> Fixed. Clearly I need to improve my vim schools, as this is just
> embarrassing at this point :).
>
>
*skills*
/me is disappointed in my self
--
Jason Cobb
On 6/9/20 9:18 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:04 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> What follows is a proto-contract to provide independent dispute
>> resolution for alleged contract violations. Like arbitration often is in
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:04 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> What follows is a proto-contract to provide independent dispute
> resolution for alleged contract violations. Like arbitration often is in
> the real world, this can be unfair and biased, and it lacks an appeals
>
What follows is a proto-contract to provide independent dispute
resolution for alleged contract violations. Like arbitration often is in
the real world, this can be unfair and biased, and it lacks an appeals
mechanism. On the bright side, this allows specifying penalties other
than the Class-2
On 6/9/2020 5:32 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
Sorry it's taken so long to get back to this thread. I kind of forgot
about this for a bit there.
On 2020-06-03 18:59, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 8:48 PM Reuben Staley via
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:46 PM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 2020-06-09 16:26, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
> agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:32 PM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >> I see. I think that would be classified as the
On 2020-06-09 16:26, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:32 PM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
wrote:
I see. I think that would be classified as the second point in the "All
Offices" section that says
* Situations not enumerated above
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:32 PM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Sorry it's taken so long to get back to this thread. I kind of forgot
> about this for a bit there.
>
> On 2020-06-03 18:59, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
> agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 8:48
Sorry it's taken so long to get back to this thread. I kind of forgot
about this for a bit there.
On 2020-06-03 18:59, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 8:48 PM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
wrote:
On 2020-06-03 17:00, Publius
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:29 PM grok via agora-business
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, 3:06 PM Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > what is ISTIDDIES?
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:59 PM Alex Smith via agora-discussion <
> >
On 6/8/20 2:00 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> Here's another step towards solving the proposal rewards problem. Let
> me know what you all think.
>
> -Aris
> ---
> Title: Interested Proposals Redux
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: Murphy, Ørjan, nch
>
>
> [I know
what is ISTIDDIES?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:59 PM Alex Smith via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 June 2020, 20:16:09 GMT+1, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On 6/9/2020 11:21 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > I submit the
On 6/9/20 3:00 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/9/20 2:14 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Is there any reason this isn't just "A player CAN spend 100 barrels to win
>>> the game"?
>> tbh, because I was a little bored with that stock phrasing, and the
>> reaction to it
On 6/9/20 2:14 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Is there any reason this isn't just "A player CAN spend 100 barrels to win
>> the game"?
> tbh, because I was a little bored with that stock phrasing, and the
> reaction to it from commenters so far shows that IMO we've got a bit of a
On Tuesday, 9 June 2020, 20:16:09 GMT+1, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/9/2020 11:21 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
> >> A player CAN win the game, but it will cost em 100 barrels.
> > This is unusual
On 6/9/2020 11:21 AM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
>> A player CAN win the game, but it will cost em 100 barrels.
> This is unusual wording for this, and it looks a lot like it would permit a
> player to win the game without
I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
> A player CAN win the game, but it will cost em 100 barrels.
This is unusual wording for this, and it looks a lot like it would permit a
player to win the game without having 100 barrels.
Is there any reason this isn't just "A player
Archived at https://github.com/AgoraNomic/Reportor/tree/master/weekly_summaries
Report for the week of 2020-06-01..07:
# Summary
Welcome, Tyler!
A very busy week. With nch's new "Sets" economy coming, there's a rush
to submit proposals while submitting them is still free, leading the
Promotor
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:25 PM nch via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 6/9/20 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> >
> > I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
> >
> >
> > Create a power-1
On 6/9/2020 9:25 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/9/20 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>>
>> I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
>>
>>
>> Create a power-1 rule, "The General
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 16:25, nch via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/9/20 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> >
> > I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
> >
> >
> > Create a power-1 rule,
On 6/9/20 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling", AI-1:
>
>
> Create a power-1 rule, "The General Store", with the following text:
>
>Barrels are a
The below AIs are inconsistent:
> 8437l R. Lee, G. 1.0 Guilderoy Lockhart
> //
> ID: 8437
> Title: Guilderoy Lockhart
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: R. Lee
> Co-authors: G.
- Falsifian
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 21:06, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/8/20 4:51 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> > 1 seems unconvincing. The NAX now requires simple majority for
> > amendments (meaning not all members need to publicly consent to the next
> > change), and I think
oh gosh no
On 6/8/2020 9:05 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 5:56 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
[Juggling three distributions in my mind at once pls send help]
My official efficiency is rapidly increasing. Thoughts on the idea of
moving to
Thank you Aris and Rebecca for your purchases! These are truly some
precious, powerful pieces of gamestate, I'm sure you'll love them.
Thank you for your patronage! And if you ever need again the assistance of
the Agoran forces beyond, .:*~*【THE MYSTICAL MENAGERIE】*~*:. is here to
help you out!
27 matches
Mail list logo
