So, by my count there's 3 people who could win via radiance pretty
much at any time due to stamps. I sure don't begrudge the wins at
all, but it's extremely demotivtating to bother to get radiance, to
know it could be reset at any time on a whim. Really gives a "no
point in trying" feeling to rad
On 4/2/23 13:27, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
So, by my count there's 3 people who could win via radiance pretty
much at any time due to stamps. I sure don't begrudge the wins at
all, but it's extremely demotivtating to bother to get radiance, to
know it could be reset at any time on
>> 8945~ snail 2.0 Going up
> AGAINST - what a horribly overpowered idea, rule power shouldn't be
> gamefied by ephemera.
It's fine if it's overpowered, it's quarterly! (Glances at the recursion stone)
But seriously, power just BEGS to be gameified, that's my immediate th
On Sun, 2023-04-02 at 11:27 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> So, by my count there's 3 people who could win via radiance pretty
> much at any time due to stamps. I sure don't begrudge the wins at
> all, but it's extremely demotivtating to bother to get radiance, to
> know it could
On 4/2/23 15:40, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
Am I one of the people who could get a Radiance win immediately by
cashing in stamps? In my case, it isn't malice or anything like that –
it's a case of not being sufficiently tuned into the game to know what
the exchange rate is and whether it
On 4/1/23 21:50, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00079 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2168
("Extending the Voting Period"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to
the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection h
On 4/2/23 17:13, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> 8943 AGAINST
> I don't want to give Janet some radiance
> for something that hasn't gotten anyone
> any radiance yet.
Except you agree that it's broken?
> 8944 AGAINST
> I don't know what this does
> or what problem it 'fixes'
> and Jan
On 4/2/23 15:03, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 4/2/23 17:13, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
8943 AGAINST
I don't want to give Janet some radiance
for something that hasn't gotten anyone
any radiance yet.
Except you agree that it's broken?
Of course it's broken, yet no
On 4/2/23 18:07, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 4/2/23 15:03, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 4/2/23 17:13, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
>>> 8943 AGAINST
>>> I don't want to give Janet some radiance
>>> for something that hasn't gotten anyone
>>> any radian
On 4/2/23 17:14, Forest Sweeney via agora-official wrote:
https://agoranomic.org/calendar.html - has strange events on it
Strange events such as what?
https://agoranomic.org/archives.html - has dated information (contracts are
no longer repealed)
That's clearly not what it says. The archi
On 4/2/23 15:40, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
On 4/2/23 17:14, Forest Sweeney via agora-official wrote:
https://agoranomic.org/calendar.html - has strange events on it
Strange events such as what?
Only birthdays of players no longer, or birthdays under different names
(examples of bad
On 4/2/23 18:59, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
If the value Janet has most recently envisioned is the Dream of Charity,
and no player has envisioned the dream of charity in the past 24 hours, I
envision the dream of wealth.
If 2 or more players have envisioned the dream of Charity in th
On 4/2/23 15:32, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>>> 8945~ snail 2.0 Going up
>> AGAINST - what a horribly overpowered idea, rule power shouldn't be
>> gamefied by ephemera.
> It's fine if it's overpowered, it's quarterly! (Glances at the recursion
> stone)
>
> But
13 matches
Mail list logo
