nix via agora-business [2023-04-29 19:59]:
> Title: Registrar Tracks Birthdays
Oh no, work!
--
juan
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:29 AM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/30/23 17:47, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> > I intend to award Employee of the Year to either Janet or snail,
> > subject to discussion.
> I'm not convinced this works as an offici
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:38 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:28 AM nix via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/30/23 17:47, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> > > I intend to award Employee of the Year to either Janet or snail,
> > > subject to dis
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:28 AM nix via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 4/30/23 17:47, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> > I intend to award Employee of the Year to either Janet or snail,
> > subject to discussion.
> I'm not convinced this works as an official intent (I'm not even sure if
>
On 5/2/23 11:28, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
Very hard to choose between the two. Maybe other factors shouldn't
count, but since neither has ever won any yearly award, and snail
already looks like a lock for the Golden Glove, I'd personally lean
towards Janet for this one.
Another thought:
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 10:28 AM nix via agora-business
wrote:
> If an officer specified a Delegate when taking a Vacation, and the
> Delegate has publicly consented, then the Delegate can act as if e
> is the holder of the Office while the officer is On Vacation.
I'm still against thi
On 4/30/23 17:47, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
I intend to award Employee of the Year to either Janet or snail,
subject to discussion.
I'm not convinced this works as an official intent (I'm not even sure if
it was meant to be one vs just a statement of what you plan to do). But
I a
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:17 AM Aspen via agora-business
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:01 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/2/23 01:01, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:38 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> > > agora-busin...@ago
Ah! Thank you. I'll amend that along with anything else you (or others) may
see, in one go then, once time has passed or more comments have come in.
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:35 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/2/23 05:06, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-busi
I appreciate the consideration but I'd suggest a different implementation,
perhaps using something different than blots.
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:57 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:36 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussio
On 5/2/23 01:01, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:38 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> [Proposal 8639
>> failed to make this change because it used "amend" for a power change.
>
> If everyone involved including you knew
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:36 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> @Yachay/Juan: both of you expressed interest in something a little less
> grounded and more "dramatic" (EG play battles), hopefully this can
> incorporate that, whilst also allowing for t
On 5/2/23 10:35, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
Title: It's now called Drama
Adoption Index: 3.0
Author: 4st
Co-author:
Strong AGAINST on all of this. It has exactly the same issues as the
current system, except with harsher penalties.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald
@Yachay/Juan: both of you expressed interest in something a little less
grounded and more "dramatic" (EG play battles), hopefully this can
incorporate that, whilst also allowing for the "oops/ouch" mechanism to
function properly.
{
Title: It's now called Drama
Adoption Index: 3.0
Author: 4st
Co-au
On 5/2/23 05:06, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
if ey haven't done so
I'll read the rest soon, but just to note: the version of spivak Agora
iplements uses "e [singular agreement]" not "ey [plural agreement]"
which I understand that some similar systems use. So this should be "if
e
Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion [2023-05-01 11:46]:
> Maybe making the delegation subject to a public volunteer process - so it’s
> treated differently if more than one person want the job, so the
> hand-picking potential is more limited?
I suggest we treat this the same way as the list of judges
16 matches
Mail list logo
