On Thursday, June 29, 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 13:43 -0700, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > Happy 24th birthday to Agora!
>
> I award Yally a Magenta Ribbon. (That is your Agora nickname, right?)
>
> --
> ais523
>
It is!
On Monday, June 26, 2017, CuddleBeam > wrote:
> >No, it only allows me to limit eir game actions because it only allows
>
> internal actions, if you look at the rules.
>
>
> ...I don't see that. Maybe I'm missing something though - in which case,
> please point out what I'm missing. What I'm find
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> Registrar's Report
>
>
> Players (26) (Rule 869, self-ratifying)
>
> Player Contact Registered
> -- --- --
> ais523 call
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 6 May 2014 23:38, "Aaron Goldfein" wrote:
> >
> > Are people interested in doing another blitz nomic around the time of
> > Agora's birthday?
> >
> > If so, does anyone have any ideas fo
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:18 PM, omd wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
> wrote:
>> I object, for semi-obvious reasons.
>
> Me too, as my identity should be clear from the From line.
I'm in favor, because I really want to see all the IRC people sign
every one of their mes
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Thelas Staloras
wrote:
> I object to my deregistration (only), then become inactive if able.
>
> --
> Bayushi
Activity no longer exists. Rather, players become eligible to be
deregistered without objection when they haven't sent a message to the
public forum in the
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Mon, 5/5/14, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> > NumAuthor AI Title
>> > 7641 scshunt 2 Relative Months
>> FOR
>> > 7642 Fool3 On breaking the game
>> AGAINST
>
> If
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, omd wrote:
> > I assign CFJ 3406 to LiberonScien:
>
> I CFJ on the following: omd assigned CFJ 3406 using a process
> that, over time, would allow all interested players have a reasonably
> equal opportunity to judg
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> The existence and current interpretation of R104 directly
> demonstrates, via a current Rule, that a "game" ended in the
> past while Agora continued.
>
> (And you thought we just kept that around for fun).
>
Either that or Michael Norris
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Followup: here's my judicial list (combining people standing/sitting
> in the old system who have posted since Jan 1 with people so far
> expressing interest):
>
> ais523, G., woggle, omd, Tiger, Shredder, Murphy.
>
> (Sprocklem, Nichdel,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> For each of the following players I intend, without objection, to
> deregister em due to being inactive for over 3 months.
>
> arkestra
> ehird
> FKA441344
> Fool
> FSX
> Ienpw III
> Lindar
> Max Schutz
&
Hi Shredder,
Welcome to Agora! As others have mentioned, that is indeed a good way to
submit a proposal. And, the one you submitted is a good one too. You've got
my vote.
Since you titled your post "long time listener," I'm wondering if you're
implying that you've been watching the game without p
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> On 26 January 2014 13:30, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
> > On 26 January 2014 08:10, omd wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:09 AM, omd wrote:
> >> > Rulekeepor: Tiger, omd
> >>
> >> I vote for myself. Campaign speech: I'll maintain
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> > In contrast, and in line with Norrish' subgame manifesto, I think a
> > subgame that's encoded into the Agoran rules is the way to go.
>
> Makes sense. In that context, is there any major di
din wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> > > On 16 December 2013 00:31, Michael Norrish <
> michael.norr...@nicta.com.au> wrote:
> > > On 16/12/13 10:28, Tanner Swett wrote:
> > > > On Dec 15, 2013, at
What's the point of repealing the Map of Agora anyway? If we're getting rid
of it, why not get rid of Town Fountain at the same time?
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> > 7610 G. 3 Or 0 I1 - Low-hang
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> But no matter how simple as it gets, we'll still need that list
> of core officers,
>
Why? Maybe the fact people have lost interest in Agora is because the core
of the game has hardly changed in years. It seems like we found
judicial/propos
I'm pretty sure Agora is just in a massive lull. Or finally kicked the
bucket.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Joe Stefek wrote:
> I got yours, and was wondering the same thing.
>
> --aperfectring
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Benjamin Schultz <
> ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
So, our system is that we basically just have one player playing the game
who optionally takes advice on how to play it? That doesn't seem very
nomicy to me (even if it's the best way for us to play chess).
I'd prefer some sort of move voting system, perhaps where everyone can vote
on one of the l
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
>> I hereby resolve the Agoran Decision to select a degree to award for
>> ais523's thesis "A History of Agoran Wins, 2009-Present"
>>
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I hereby resolve the Agoran Decision to select a degree to award for
> ais523's thesis "A History of Agoran Wins, 2009-Present"
>
> The votes were as follows:
>
> scshunt: FAILING GRADE (x2)
> Yally: FAILING GRADE
> Keba: FAILING GRADE
> G.: FAIL
There are actually a lot of judges in the rotation these days, so being in
the rotation at the normal rate is not too much effort. So, for the time
being, I'll stop recusing myself from every other case, but I reserve the
right to start doing this again if the number of judges decreases or I get
bu
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 28 July 2013 23:39, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Charles Walker <
> charles.w.wal...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I hereby initiate the Agoran decision to ele
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:17 PM, omd wrote:
> Proposal: Down with bromides (AI=3)
>
> Amend Rule 101 to read:
>
> Please treat Agora right good forever.
>
> [ i. is meaningless.
> ii. was only considered to have an effect once, and it probably
> shouldn't have been judged that way. It i
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Lindar Greenwood
wrote:
> At the insistence of Roujo, I do now assume a posture of standing.
> Let it be known that I do so proudly, and with a ridiculous pose.
>
This fails. You can't simply flip your posture to standing. You need to
flip it to sitting, and then
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Jonathan Rouillard <
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> >> I submit the following proposal and pay the Distributabil
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 13:45 +1000, Steven Gardner wrote:
>> I intend to be around for this chat session, in a little under 7.5 hours'
>> time. Can someone please remind me how to join this session? I don't really
>> grok irc.
>
> The easiest way
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
>> If anyone wants them, let me know.
>>
>> -- Walker
>>
>
> Same here - yes please! -G.
I would also love to see them. Unfortunately something came up at the
last minute and I wasn't able to join
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Steven Gardner
wrote:
> On 1 July 2013 14:35, Chuck Carroll wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks to all the players, especially my fellow winners, and many many
>> thanks to Fool for running such an enjoyable game. Like others have
>> mentioned, I like the idea of a Nomic w
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jun 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
>
>> There will be an irc session in celebration of Agora's birthday in the
>> ##nomic channel on Sunday 30th June (tomorrow) starting at 21:00 UTC.
>
>
> I am a little confused by this.
>
> Agora's
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Fool wrote:
>>
>> Happy birthday Agora!
>>
>> I award myself a Magenta ribbon. I paint myself Magenta to match. I am
>> wearing pants.
>>
>>
> Happy 20th birthday, Agora!
>
> I aware myself a Magenta Ribbon.
>
>
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:08 AM, omd wrote:
> Oh, and if anyone is here in the next hour or so (if I remember correctly)
> and hasn't voted due to apathy, remember that 364 awards the win to a group
> of players that does not include you, and has had many extra votes cast FOR
> it.
>
>
> (I hope W
Re: Agora Celebrates 20 Years!
To: Aaron Goldfein
Tell the current Agorans that they're totally, completely, wonderfully
insane for understanding the complex rules of Agora. :) I myself left
because it was just so complex, as is the [initial] nature of the game
over time. I remember I was goi
I submit a new proposal and vote FOR it:
Enact a new rule reading:
The Speaker of the second and subsequent games is the winner of the
previous game who first gave his consent to holding such a role via an
Agoran public forum during the month of May. If no such player exists,
then the Speaker of
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Steven Gardner
wrote:
> It would be an interesting project to design a terse and elegant, non-buggy
> set of initial Rules suitable playing blitz nomic on a mailing list.
Or we could just squash all the bugs and continue where we left off
last year. Ideal blitz ru
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Fool wrote:
> Argh **
>
> Yes, Chuck did privately vote against 344. And no, Walker did vote against,
> he changed his public for to a private against about 9 hours later.
>
> So it's actually 4:4, fail, we're back to rule 343. Yally did not get 10
> point
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Fool wrote:
> On 26/06/2013 12:09 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I vote for 345-347 (think I already voted on 345)
>>
>> 344 I'll defer to speaker's opinion on ongoing-ness in future.
>>
>> -Goethe
>>
>
> :VETO:
Presumably, we could change the speaker. After a
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Fool wrote:
>
> [Missed one...]
>
> Here I'll just number and repeat the four new proposals that were made.
> You can vote by replying to this message, privately if you like.
> I'll send out a full report shortly.
>
> -Dan
>
> 344 (Yally):
>>
>> Amend Rule 326 to r
Shouldn't I have some points, at the very least from voting against a
passing proposal here?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Fool wrote:
> Good day Agorans,
>
> Since last report, voting on proposals 331-341 closed.
>
> Proposal 331 (omd) passed 5:1 (Walker, Chuck, omd, Yally, and ehird FOR;
>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
> Let's make this interesting.
>
> I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
>
> "If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
> voting period, that player must immediately forfeit the game."
>
> M
Too interesting
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Fool wrote:
> Here I'll just number and repeat the two new proposals. Voting closes
> in 24 hours. Voting on 331-341 closes in about 11 hours.
>
> -Dan
>
> 342 (Chuck):
>>
>> I propose that rule 311 be amended by changing the text which reads “the
>> Voter with the
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Fool wrote:
>
> Voting on 326-329 has closed and voting on 330 closes in half an hour. Full
> report at that time. Here I just number and repeat 11 new proposals.
>
> -Dan
>
>
> 331 (omd):
>> I propose that Rule 214 be amended to read:
>>
>> The Speaker shall choos
Agora XX seems to be a huge success. I do think that we should go
ahead and end it on the 30th as we planned, but I would like to bring
it back in the future. This proposal provides for the game to be
played each year from the start of June until the start of Agora's
birthday. Each subsequent year
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I propose to amend Rule 324 by deleting the first sentence.
>
> -- Walker
Against, based on a lack of suitable replacement.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> > I propose the following amendment to Rule 306:
>> >
>> > A player may transfer points to another player by posting to that
>> > effect on
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I transfer 25 points from omd to FSX.
>> I transfer 20 points from Walker to Yally.
>> I transfer 20 points from Chuck to Michael.
>> I transfer 20 points from ehird to scshunt.
>>
>> I tr
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 21 Jun 2013, at 03:40, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>>> wrote:
>>>>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Michael Norrish
wrote:
> I register for the Agora XX game.
>
> Michael
>
Now I feel like there was no reason to modify Rule 104.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Charles Walker
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I propose a ##nomic session, with discussion of
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Charles Walker <
> charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I propose a ##nomic session, with discussion of Agora's history and other
>> chat. We can invite a
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I propose a ##nomic session, with discussion of Agora's history and other
> chat. We can invite any ancients who reply to Yally's email.
>
> Would 22:00, UK time on the 29th be ok for most people? (We might want to
> look into organising a f
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Fool wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Here I'll only number and repeat the one proposal made that hasn't yet
> been numbered. You can vote by just replying to this message, privately if
> you like.
>
> Voting on this closes in 24h.
>
> -Dan
>
> 305 (Chuck):
>
>> I propose
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Jonathan Rouillard <
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I assume CotC. Let's hope it works. =P
>
> Please stand by while I work through the backlog of cases.
>
> ~ Roujo
>
Have I missed something? I thought CotC was postulated.
Within the next day or two, I'm going to try to email as many players
listed in the Registrar's report as I can.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:15 PM, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > I just emailed Peter Suber, inviting him to our eve
I just emailed Peter Suber, inviting him to our events and asking for any
commentary he might have. I will forward any response I receive.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Charles Walker <
> charles.w.wal...@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 9 May 2013 01:13, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>> If such a proposal were to pass, I would gladly volunteer to serve as the
>> officer. Additionally, I think we ought to start planning specific events
>> for the vi
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:28 PM, omd wrote:
> For the record, prompted by someone asking to be a Watcher, I just
> sent this out.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: omd
> Date: Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:27 PM
> Subject: Pinging Watchers of Agora Nomic
> To: b...@fushizen.net, cmil.
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Charles Walker wrote:
> {
>
> Enact a Rule with the following text:
>
> Agora's Twentieth Birthday shall be known as the Vigintennial.
> The Comptroller of the Lord Chamberlain's Office is an office;
> its holder is responsible for organising th
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 1 May 2013 19:43, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > The Registrar's history section has contact information for nearly every
> > player in Agora's history (not that it's necessarily all current). For
> those
>
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 1 May 2013 06:37, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > Idea: try to contact as many old-timers as possible (ideally through
> > personal links, rather than just spamming the Observer list) and
> > create some sort of monument with a bit of contribution
Dear Agorans,
As many of you are aware, in just two short months Agora will be
celebrating the completion of its 20th year of existence, having been
played continuously during that entire frame. As the world's longest-lived
and wisest nomic, and indeed one of the longest-lived and wisest among all
I must say, I'm somewhat alarmed by the recent flood of using "we" to mean
"I." It's a good thing we're in a Gerontocracy.
These acronyms are all in the rules. VC stands for voting credit. VVLOP
doesn't officially stand for anything.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Max Schutz wrote:
> can you clarify those acronyms for me
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:48 AM
Basically, it would repeal all the rules and people would submit new
rulesets and we would vote on which one to use.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Max Schutz wrote:
> I request clarification on this proposal in laman's terms if at all doable
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Proposal, "The Steward Sweeps", AI-2 please:
>
> ==
> [Removes the ossified ruling puppetry. Leaves the hint of a speaker,
> including a ribbon, for a future return].
>
>
ith wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 17:42 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > > I initiate an election to decide the holder of the IADoP office. I
> nominate
> > > myself for that election. I intend, through
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 3:34 PM, omd wrote:
> THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
This seems to be really out of date. Admittedly I haven't been paying
much attention to Agora lately, but there's no way no changes have
occurred since October. For example, the Ribbons proposal has since
been adopted.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> On 01/17/2013 03:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>>> 7330 1.0 Ordinary Pavitra Oops
>> FOR
>>> 7332 1.0 Ordinary Machiavelli Lesser oops
>> AGAINST
>
> These votes together imply that if you can&#x
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>
>Inactive: ais523 (standing)
> BobTHJ
> Flameshadowxeroshin
> justine sells
> Ozymandias
> Roujo
> scat
>
Is a space defined as 32?
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> ROUND 1 CODING CHALLENGE
>
> Name : Odd
>
> Summary: Take as input a single line of integers in base 10, output the
> odd numbers in the input line (in base 10) in order, and terminate.
>
> Par:
I endorse FKA441344.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:54 PM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The voting period of the Agoran Decision to determine the new Air
> Traffic Controller has been extended to 14 days (The message
> purporting to resolve it was incorrect; its voting period will not end
> un
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Sam Loomis wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've heard of nomic before and decided to join Agora as a start. I'm not
> sure what is the most efficient way to "catch on" to all the rules. Is
> there a source where I can read them, or should I just pick it up as I go
> along?
>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:09 PM, WoodsPam wrote:
> Is there any player still playing that was a player when the game first
> started, or has the entire roster of players changed (perhaps several
> times)?
>
> --
> ---WoodsPam
>
By some amazing sequence of events, among all current players, my la
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> Do I need to know all the rules to play?
>
> --
> -Henri
>
No, you don't. In fact, when I first joined Agora a little over three years
ago, I registered to play before I saw even a single message sent to the
d-lists, had barely even glimp
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:11 AM, omd wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > So, I just realized the rules never took notice of proposal 6671,
> adopted on
> > March 22, 2010 and affecting Rule 1367. This also means that parts of
> > pro
So, I just realized the rules never took notice of proposal 6671, adopted
on March 22, 2010 and affecting Rule 1367. This also means that parts of
proposal 6717 were ineffective.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:53 PM, omd wrote:
> I create a Slave Golem whose name is the full body of this message.
>
> (Preemptive arguments: It's not confusing, merely long.)
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Pavitra
> wrote:
> > On 06/08/2012 07:03 PM, John Smith wrote:
> >> For good measure,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:54, Pavitra wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 11:25 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Yally wrote:
> >
> >> I became active on this date at this time.
> >
> > I'm interpreting this as a reasonably obvious typo for "become".
>
> Gratuitous: "a" and "o" are adjacent on Dvorak but not Qwerty.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 23:00, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 21:37 +, FKA441344 wrote:
>>>
>>> If I judged case 3172 FALSE, I intend to appeal it with two support,
>>> on the grounds that the judgement I assigned to it was intended for
>>> case 3173.
>>
>> I suppo
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:09, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> I intend, with two support, to appeal this case. I request a with
>> prejudice ruling as Judge omd inappropriately discharged eir duties in
>> this case.
>
> Gra
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:21, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Evidence
>
> [Registrar's Report 1-Feb-2012 extract]
> > The Person Forme... 441...@gmail.com 13 Jan 12 *
> > [...]
> > * The Person Formally Known As 441344
>
This was a mistake, acknowledged by me immediately after the message
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 08:41, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> INACTIVE PLAYERS (2)
>>
>> Nickname Since
>> --
>> scshunt 10 Jan 12
>> Sgeo 24 Oct 11 *
>
>
>
> * The Person Formally Known As 441344
>
Fail: FORMERLY. (I got it right in the list...)
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 13:32, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 25 January 2012 18:57, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Proposal Human Point Two, Morendil, Steve (x3), Andre (x3),
> >> ais523 (x2), Canada, Bucky, G., omd, woggle,
> >> Spitemaster, alli
Maybe I missed something, but are you a player?
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 16:33, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of
> whether to adopt it. For this decision, the eligible voters are the active
> first-class players at the t
I state my support for southpointingchariot to support ais523 to hold this
position. I don't, however, support ais523.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 22:34, southpointingchariot <
southpointingchariot.no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I state my support for ais523 to hold this position.
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 18:19, southpointingchariot
wrote:
> Greetings, I am writing to express my interest, as a Chronicler of Aeonomic,
> in establishing a formal relationship between our two communities.
>
> Aeonomic is a young nomic with a focus on minimalism and proceduralism. Feel
> free to c
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 01:14, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Bucky wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 15:44, Sean Hunt
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:36, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3127
= Criminal Case 3
This case would create a new level of appeals, "The Supreme Court,"
which consists of some entitled members and otherwise consists of
members that the CotC subjectively determines to be the most suited
for the case. I THINK the below proposal should properly inherit
appeals issues from appeal cases
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 23:11, omd wrote:
> Proposal: okay, this has gotten silly (AI=3)
>
> Repeal Rule 2339 (Intention).
> Repeal Rule 2351 (Agora, Adult).
Against. Veto. Exile!
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:22, Charles Reiss wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:56, Tanner Swett wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> >> I agree with scshunt's arguments. Destroying the points all at once is
> >> permitted by
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 18:08, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:00, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > I agree with scshunt's arguments. Destroying the points all at once is
> > permitted by the rules, even if it is a mistake in the rules. Trying to
> > catch
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:42, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 16:26, Arkady English
> wrote:
> > On 11 August 2011 15:20, Charles Walker
> wrote:
> >> On 11 August 2011 14:57, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
> >>> On 11 August 2011 00:09, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
> Agora cannot play Blo
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 06:19, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 04:16, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>
>> On 26 July 2011 11:54, Charles Walker wrote:
>> > I intend, without objection, to deregister Sgeo.
>> > I intend, without objection, to deregister Florw.
>> > I intend, without objection
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:00, Arkady English
wrote:
> I announce that I deregister the President.
>
> I call a CFJ on the statement "The president has been deregistered"
> submitting the following statement/evidence:
>
>
> Rule 2326/2 states "The President is a second-class person. Causing the
>
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 21:38, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 5 July 2011 03:23, Flameshadowxeroshin
> wrote:
>> I registered and I don't see any record of my deregistration.
>
> "Having received no objections, I deregister Flameshadowxeroshin."
>
> --Wooble, 6 April 2011
>
But we'd love to have you r
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 17:50, Joshua Murphy wrote:
> People refer to some CFJs like they were rules, but they aren't really rules.
> If there isn't any particular reason for this, can we make them actual rules?
CFJ procedure is codified in the rules. A CFJ itself can be called by
any player to
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 03:54, Charles Walker
wrote:
> Are any other Gmail users getting an annoying "This message may not
> have been sent by:" at the top of all of their own messages to the
> lists?
>
> --
> Charles Walker
>
Not to my own messages, but I am getting that warning from all
message
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:12, Joshua Murphy wrote:
> I hereby register with the nickname of Math321.
Welcome!
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 23:25, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 18 June 2011 05:22, Sgeo wrote:
> > I object.
>
> I intend, without objection, to deregister Sgeo.
>
> You are inactive and raising the quorum.
>
Inactive players don't count towards the quorum.
1 - 100 of 542 matches
Mail list logo
